Closed
Bug 429650
Opened 16 years ago
Closed 16 years ago
Crash [@ CAccessibleText::get_attributes(long, long*, long*, unsigned short**) ]
Categories
(Core :: Disability Access APIs, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
mozilla1.9
People
(Reporter: MarcoZ, Assigned: surkov)
References
Details
(Keywords: access, crash)
Crash Data
Attachments
(1 file)
881 bytes,
patch
|
aaronlev
:
review+
damons
:
approval1.9+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
Found while triaging 3.0b5 crashers. One crash report: bp-d181faf5-0a01-11dd-9b1f-001cc4e2bf68
Flags: blocking1.9?
Comment 1•16 years ago
|
||
Not a significant number to block on. Please re-nom if you disagree.
Flags: blocking1.9? → blocking1.9-
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•16 years ago
|
||
Attachment #316543 -
Flags: review?(aaronleventhal)
Reporter | ||
Comment 3•16 years ago
|
||
Alexander, do we have more places where we could harden our code against invalid arguments? I've seen a couple more crashes with only single instances which appeared to look like this one.
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•16 years ago
|
||
All places are our ;) If we would ensure it's incorrect client's call then we could fix it but even MSDN gives examples where they do not check this.
Updated•16 years ago
|
Attachment #316543 -
Flags: review?(aaronleventhal)
Attachment #316543 -
Flags: review+
Attachment #316543 -
Flags: approval1.9?
Assignee | ||
Comment 5•16 years ago
|
||
Marco, I filed bug 429990 to address your comment.
Comment 6•16 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 316543 [details] [diff] [review] looks like? Tests? Explanation of risk? Re-request approval once addressed.
Attachment #316543 -
Flags: approval1.9? → approval1.9-
Assignee | ||
Comment 7•16 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 316543 [details] [diff] [review] looks like? (In reply to comment #6) > (From update of attachment 316543 [details] [diff] [review]) > Tests? Explanation of risk? Re-request approval once addressed. > No risk - it's just out argument checkin on NULL. It should hard to get a test, at least I can't keep in mind the way how to achieve this. Basically we should write external c++ application which should operate with firefox (small IAccessible2 client). I think it's not reasonable to spend significant amount of time for such small and simple patch. re-requesting approval
Attachment #316543 -
Flags: approval1.9- → approval1.9?
Comment 8•16 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 316543 [details] [diff] [review] looks like? a1.9+=damons
Attachment #316543 -
Flags: approval1.9? → approval1.9+
Assignee | ||
Comment 9•16 years ago
|
||
Checking in accessible/src/msaa/CAccessibleText.cpp; /cvsroot/mozilla/accessible/src/msaa/CAccessibleText.cpp,v <-- CAccessibleText.cpp new revision: 1.12; previous revision: 1.11 done
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 16 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Updated•13 years ago
|
Crash Signature: [@ CAccessibleText::get_attributes(long, long*, long*, unsigned short**) ]
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•