Closed
Bug 46426
Opened 25 years ago
Closed 25 years ago
crash deleting and selecting local messages quickly
Categories
(Core :: XUL, defect, P3)
Tracking
()
M18
People
(Reporter: Bienvenu, Assigned: bryner)
Details
(Keywords: crash, Whiteboard: [nsbeta3+] [need info])
I crashed with the following stack. If I advance the IP in the debugger, I can
continue past the crash no problem, so a simple check for null would fix this.
Assigning to Hyatt since it seems tree control-related.
nsXULTreeElement::SelectItemRange(nsXULTreeElement * const 0x03432448,
nsIDOMXULElement * 0x00000000, nsIDOMXULElement * 0x065561dc) line 311 + 53 bytes
XULTreeElementSelectItemRange(JSContext * 0x023c4b50, JSObject * 0x02de20e0,
unsigned int 0x00000002, long * 0x056341dc, long * 0x0012db58) line 463 + 33 bytes
js_Invoke(JSContext * 0x023c4b50, unsigned int 0x00000002, unsigned int
0x00000000) line 716 + 23 bytes
js_Interpret(JSContext * 0x023c4b50, long * 0x0012e494) line 2517 + 15 bytes
js_Invoke(JSContext * 0x023c4b50, unsigned int 0x00000001, unsigned int
0x00000002) line 732 + 13 bytes
js_InternalInvoke(JSContext * 0x023c4b50, JSObject * 0x0532e6d0, long
0x055da4d8, unsigned int 0x00000000, unsigned int 0x00000001, long * 0x0012e628,
long * 0x0012e5b8) line 805 + 19 bytes
JS_CallFunctionValue(JSContext * 0x023c4b50, JSObject * 0x0532e6d0, long
0x055da4d8, unsigned int 0x00000001, long * 0x0012e628, long * 0x0012e5b8) line
2817 + 31 bytes
nsJSContext::CallEventHandler(nsJSContext * const 0x023c4ce0, void * 0x0532e6d0,
void * 0x055da4d8, unsigned int 0x00000001, void * 0x0012e628, int * 0x0012e624,
int 0x00000000) line 847 + 33 bytes
nsJSEventListener::HandleEvent(nsIDOMEvent * 0x04736254) line 154 + 64 bytes
nsXBLEventHandler::ExecuteHandler(nsXBLEventHandler * const 0x064f8960, const
nsString & {...}, nsIDOMEvent * 0x04736254) line 629
nsXBLEventHandler::MouseClick(nsIDOMEvent * 0x04736254) line 177 + 44 bytes
nsEventListenerManager::HandleEvent(nsIPresContext * 0x023c50d0, nsEvent *
0x0012f418, nsIDOMEvent * * 0x0012f390, nsIDOMEventTarget * 0x064f8040, unsigned
int 0x00000002, nsEventStatus * 0x0012f79c) line 845 + 23 bytes
nsXULElement::HandleDOMEvent(nsXULElement * const 0x064f8030, nsIPresContext *
0x023c50d0, nsEvent * 0x0012f418, nsIDOMEvent * * 0x0012f390, unsigned int
0x00000002, nsEventStatus * 0x0012f79c) line 3350
currentItem is null, so we crash.
while (PR_TRUE) {
content = do_QueryInterface(currentItem);
content->GetTag(*getter_AddRefs(tag));
if (tag && tag.get() == kTreeItemAtom)
content->SetAttribute(kNameSpaceID_None, kSelectedAtom,
trueString, /*aNotify*/ PR_TRUE);
if (currentItem == aEndItem)
break;
nsCOMPtr<nsIDOMElement> nextItem;
treebox->GetNextItem(currentItem, 1, getter_AddRefs(nextItem));
currentItem = nextItem;
}
Reporter | ||
Updated•25 years ago
|
Comment 1•25 years ago
|
||
->bryner as nsbeta3+. Need steps to reproduce in bug report.
Assignee: bryner
Whiteboard: nsbeta3+
Target Milestone: --- → M18
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•25 years ago
|
||
What build did you see this on? Can you retest with a build from 7/27 or newer?
(hyatt checked in some massive tree changes the evening of 7/26)
Thanks.
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•25 years ago
|
||
I need some steps to reproduce this...
Whiteboard: nsbeta3+ → [nsbeta3+] [need info]
Comment 4•25 years ago
|
||
If this is related to a widget, it's not really selection (which is for text
selection).
Handing off to jrgm.
Component: Selection → XP Toolkit/Widgets
QA Contact: elig → jrgm
Reporter | ||
Comment 5•25 years ago
|
||
I'll try again with a recent build. The way I reproduced it was to select
messages (both singly and multiply) and delete quickly - I would change the
selection while the previous delete was going on. I don't have reproducible
steps because it involved a lot of destructive behaviour. However, the fix was
trivial, as I said.
Reporter | ||
Comment 6•25 years ago
|
||
I was not able to reproduce this. However, bulletproofing the code wouldn't hurt!
Assignee | ||
Comment 7•25 years ago
|
||
Actually, I have another bug dealing with needing to update the current item
correctly on deletion (#42109). Mind if I mark this a dup?
Reporter | ||
Comment 8•25 years ago
|
||
sure, go for it.
Assignee | ||
Comment 9•25 years ago
|
||
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 42109 ***
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 25 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
Comment 10•25 years ago
|
||
verified dup. I've marked the other one "mailtrack" so we can track in mail.
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•