46972 - Image-load doesn't work (JS + img-src)

Status: RESOLVED WORKSFORME

(Core :: DOM: Core & HTML, defect, P3)

Description

[Tobias Burnus]

goto: http://www.faz.de/ you will note that no image are loaded (accept images:
all). This is with M18/2000-07-29-20/Linux.
Note: All other pages tried work ok. Using NS 4.73 it works ok.
Using View image a image is optained!
Accept of the missing type declaration in SCRIPT this is valid HTML.

Comment 1

[harishd]

Triaging Rickg's bug list:
--------------------------

Involoves JS. Reassigning bug to rogerl.

Comment 2

[Dylan Schiemann]

I'm having the same problem with two sites we develop ( http://www.aacpdm.org/ 
and http://www.westcoastinternet.net/ ).  I have been unsuccessful in attempts 
to isolate a testcase and believe that it may be a state problem, such as 
changing images using JS after the page has loaded.  FWIW, I believe that this 
was broken sometime between M16 and M17 as this was when I first noticed it.  
Around that time there was a fix for the mistyping of width and height 
attributes, which may be related (#44434).

Comment 3

[Dylan Schiemann]

I have found that using the objectRef.setAttibute("src",imageFileSource) 
instead of objectRef.src = imageFileSource works.  I am using this as a 
workaround for now.  Cross posted to bug #32269 as that bug seems related.

Comment 4

[toor]

http://www.faz.de seems OK with
ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla/nightly/2000-11-06-08-Mtrunk/mozilla-i686-pc-linux-gnu-sea.tar.gz

Is this fixed now? I don't see any problems with faz.de anyway.


/Richard

Comment 5

[Tobias Burnus]

I don't know why it didn't work (I cannot reproduce it anymore), but it might
be: bug 55714 "HTTP Pipelining doesn't load all images"

Comment 6

[Sebastian Späth]

Does this work on Linux now? It should be marked WORKSFORME OR FIXED then.

Comment 7

[Fabian Guisset]

Can anyone still reproduce this? If yes, could you please make a reduced
testcase? Thanks. Reassigning to DOM Level 0.
And since you could live 6 months with this bug (if it still exists), I must
guess it's not a blocker :P

Comment 8

[clayton]

Prasant, would you help confirm that this is no longer a problem?

Comment 9

[Johnny Stenback (:jst)]

WORKSFORME.