Open
Bug 47128
Opened 25 years ago
Updated 1 year ago
Display JavaScript error indicator in status bar
Categories
(SeaMonkey :: UI Design, defect)
SeaMonkey
UI Design
Tracking
(Not tracked)
NEW
People
(Reporter: tim, Unassigned)
References
(Blocks 1 open bug)
Details
Attachments
(3 files)
|
6.80 KB,
patch
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review | |
|
2.97 KB,
patch
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review | |
|
885 bytes,
image/gif
|
Details |
Mozilla should display an icon and message in the status bar indicating that a
JavaScript error has occurred, similar to Internet Explorer,
i.e.
[(!) An error has occurred on this page. Double click for details.]
ben@netscape.com has already partially implemented this (the java console
listener is hooked up), but it's currently commented out because the console
listener fires for chrome javascript errors too. I have a workaround for this
that catches the "error" event fired by the content DOM. Other than that, there
are a few other minor issues to address for this...
- How long should the icon/message be displayed? Obviously it should go away
when the current page is unloaded, but how should it interact with other
statusbar information? I think the error message should probably be displayed
whenever "Document: Done" would otherwise be displayed, so that the statusbar
still works for hyperlinks.
- The icon. Right now I just copied IE's. Not good :) Anyone have a good tiny
error icon? Who the heck makes the art for Netscape anyway?
- Should a ToolTip with the error message / line # / source file, etc. be
displayed when hovering over the statusbar? This would be convenient for page
authors, and trivial to add.
Assigning to self, since looking at Ben's bug count leads me to believe he won't
have time to work on this. I have it mostly done anyway. I think this is
important so errors with Mozilla's DOM are visible. (although I'm sure there
will be plenty of non-standard IE DOM errors too...)
Comment 1•25 years ago
|
||
Tim, could you combine this with bug 47108? (Please?:-)
Status: UNCONFIRMED → NEW
Ever confirmed: true
I just thought of something to enhance this. What if special error messages
were displayed for some errors. For example...
"document.all has no properties", "document.layers has no properties" would show
"An error has occurred on this page. This page uses non-standard extensions."
on the statusbar instead of the normal error message.
Adding this might reduce some of the false bug reports and blame Mozilla gets
for causing errors which are due to non-standard extensions. I don't have a lot
of experience with cross-browser scripting so I'm not sure what the most common
JS errors are (ccing ekrock, maybe he knows). This won't catch everything,
since faulty OR non-standard code can sometimes cause the same error.
The above patches add a JavaScript error indicator in the statusbar when
content errors occur. The error message is displayed wherever the
normal "Document: Done" message would otherwise be displayed. jserror.gif is
the icon used for this, and should be placed in both
mozilla/themes/classic/communicator, and mozilla/themes/modern/communicator
(I'm not sure how I add binary files with CVS...) Hopefully my artwork is
satisfactory. cc'ing Brendan for approval.
Keywords: patch
Comment 7•25 years ago
|
||
Tim, please don't try to cram the error message into the status bar. Put it into
a dialog instead (activated by clicking the icon). That way it won't get
unavoidably cropped if I'm stuck on a low-res display.
Just say `Done, but contains errors'. (Change that silly `Document: Done.' to
`Done', while you're at it.)
Comment 8•25 years ago
|
||
MozillaClassic would say:
JavaScript error: Type 'javascript:' into Location for details
which is better than just reporting that the page contains errors -- note that
classic had no Task menu item for the JavaScript console, and the only way to
bring up the JS console was to type 'javascript:' into Location. Since we can
do better in Mozilla, something about the JS console task menu item would do
better, but I'll leave that wording exercise up to the experts.
Document: Done always seemed silly to me, too. Dare we break with tradition and
user expectations?
/be
| Reporter | ||
Comment 10•25 years ago
|
||
Oops, by error message I meant the generic error message, which Ben currently
has set at "An error has occurred on this page. Double click here for
details." I also display the specific JS error message in a tooltip, and you
can double click the status bar to bring up the JS Console.
There are actually three cases which the error message has to account for:
- During Page Load
- End of Page Load
- After page load
An error that occurs during page load might display for a brief moment before
being overwritten by other status information (i.e. "Transferring..."),
although the error icon remains. The end of the page load would be the only
appropriate place to display a "Done, but with errors" type message. Then,
after a page has loaded, a user might click on something that causes a JS error.
Right now the same error message is displayed for all cases. It's probably a
good idea though to have two separate error messages, one for on page load and
the other for during/after page load. And it should indicate how to access the
JS console.
- Done (An error has occurred. Double click for details.)
- An error has occurred. Double click for details.
Comment 11•25 years ago
|
||
Why is it a double click? Why not a single click?
Comment 12•25 years ago
|
||
If it's single click, I suggest it have some kind of hover effect (presumably
like the ones that personal toolbar items for win32/mac classic have -- blue
underline on hover)
Comment 13•25 years ago
|
||
What what what? I was talking about the icon. The text shouldn't be clickable at
all -- just like any other status text.
Comment 14•25 years ago
|
||
Maybe it would become bright red on hover. It's pretty small for hover
effects, though.
Comment 15•24 years ago
|
||
So is this patch ready to go...?
Comment 16•24 years ago
|
||
Chaning the qa contact on these bugs to me. MPT will be moving to the
owner of this component shortly. I would like to thank him for all his hard
work as he moves roles in mozilla.org...Yada, Yada, Yada...
QA Contact: mpt → zach
Updated•24 years ago
|
Keywords: mozilla0.9
Comment 17•24 years ago
|
||
Since it's hard to get the cursor over a status bar button, I'd like to be able
to make the JS console come up by double-clicking anywhere in the status bar
when an error message is shown.
There should be different icons for errors and warnings, each similar to the JS
console icon. I think the icon shown should be for the most recent
error/warning that applies to content in the window.
Should messages be included, in addition to errors and warnings? Two examples
of messages:
- "The link to file:///c|/ was blocked by the security manager. Remote content
may not link to local content." (from bug 40538)
- "Deprecated method document.getSelection() called. Please use
window.getSelection() instead."
I think the file:/// message should show up but the document.getSelection()
message shouldn't. In that case, perhaps the file:/// message should be
upgraded to a warning or error (as a separate bug).
Comment 18•24 years ago
|
||
re-ccing mpt
Comment 19•24 years ago
|
||
When there's a script error, it should display "Error on page" like IE, and it
shouldn't show the error that's happening. Why? Because otherwise people will
think it's an error in the browser ("Gee, I wonder why they would think that?"
he posts in bug #47128...). For the same reason, I think the JS console should
say the name of the page on the error it caused, but that's another bug that
I'll write sometime...
Comment 20•24 years ago
|
||
Has this bug died? I think resolutions to this bug (along with other page
error/html quality bugs) are critical to Moz 1.0.
Comment 21•24 years ago
|
||
I'm not sure what this bug has to do with Mozilla 1.0, but fixing it would make
it much easier to test and debug javascript using Mozilla. We have much better
js error messages than the other browsers I've tried, but we don't tell
programmers or users when the script encounters an error. I often find myself
opening the javascript console to find out *whether* there was an error or not.
Comment 22•24 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 115584 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 23•24 years ago
|
||
Random thought: Maybe the behavior should be different whether there is an error
or a warning. Some users will want to see the warnings, some won't, some won't
want to see any errors at all. This might involve a little pref work but keeps
everyone happy.
Comment 24•24 years ago
|
||
When strict warnings are enabled, warnings are treated by the DOM as errors.
That pref will do just nicely here I think -- no additional prefwork needed.
Comment 25•24 years ago
|
||
An error message in the status string shouldn't override other messages, but
clickable error indicator with the most recent error as a tooltip should be
always visible until JavaScript console will be cleared. Right click on this
indicator should give an option to clear JavaScript console, and, may be, show
all the details about the most recent error.
Comment 26•23 years ago
|
||
As there hasn't been any visible activity on this bug for a while, I'm wondering
as to status here. The reason I said this is 1.0 critical (as it is marked in
keywords) is evangelism, as in comments 2 & 19- if users see that the site's JS
is to blame, we can make a big difference in how much JS coders think about the
idea of standards compliance and avoid a lot of unnecessary bug triaging
(reassigning bugs to evangelism every time a user finds a page with incompliant JS).
Comment 28•23 years ago
|
||
Two additions:
1. I think that error messages too often appear instead of other text, such as
page loading progress comments ("Resolving host..." "Waiting for reply...") or
link URLs. So, there should be an option to switch between "JS error" and other
text in the statusbar (like there is an option to open and close sidebar or
toolbars).
... Ordinary user could want to see loading/URL messages, and user who is
studying JS or debugging JS in a page could want to see JS messages.
2. JS error indicator/button should display last error as a tooltip (if there
were no errors, it should display last warning). May be, there could be Last JS
Error toolbar (hidden by default).
Comment 29•23 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 160415 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 30•23 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 162494 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 31•23 years ago
|
||
.
Assignee: tim → blaker
Status: ASSIGNED → NEW
Component: User Interface Design → XP Apps: GUI Features
QA Contact: zach → paw
Comment 32•23 years ago
|
||
I wonder if Jonas really meant to override the non-mpt assignment with the move
away from the User Interface Design component. It looks like Tim Hill produced
a patch, but that was two years ago and undoubtably no longer applies. Hmm...
jonasj@jonasj.dk changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|tim@prismelite.com |blaker@netscape.com
Status|ASSIGNED |NEW
Component|User Interface Design |XP Apps: GUI Features
QAContact|zach@zachlipton.com |paw@netscape.com
Comment 33•23 years ago
|
||
Following on from Jesse and Alexander's comments, it appears to me that:
* Having a popup all the time would be awful.
* Not knowing if there are any errors unless we open the javascript console to
find out whether an error has occurred at all, as things are now, is tedious.
* Overwriting the status bar text is unpleasant
I suggest that a small error icon of some sort in the status bar would be best,
which would take the user to the javascript console if clicked on
Comment 34•23 years ago
|
||
Yes, you are right.
And, in addition
1) tooltip on this indicator should contain latest error summary
2) context menu should contain some options like Show JavaScript Console,
Disable JavaScript, Disable JavaScript For This Page Only, Run JavaScript
Debugger, Clear JavaScript Console
3) this indicator should be optional (Preferences->Scripts & Plugins->JavaScript
error indicator->Show indicator/Show message in statusbar)
Comment 35•22 years ago
|
||
Wouldn't it be nice to strip out most of the features no one is sure if it
should be an error message or not. Then start with the basic, like the ability
to display the JS error. Then check it in to the Mozilla trunk. Over the
time, add some features, like javascript syntax error for starter and then add
more features over the time. It's not like that it will be done overnight and
be ready to go. Just little at a time.
The Venkerman (spelling) Debugger doesn't feel right and this alternative is
much nicer.
Comment 36•22 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 211806 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 37•22 years ago
|
||
Available as an extension
http://extensionroom.mozdev.org/#jsstatus
Comment 38•22 years ago
|
||
"Available as an extension"... for firebird only.
Comment 39•21 years ago
|
||
I support the last comments:
this bug currently is "Display JavaScript error indicator in status bar".
First, make it optional, not to bother the end-users;
Second, start with something as simple as possible, only not to have to check
the JS.C. regularly to see whether or not something happened.
I am not a javascript/page developer, I'm only interested in Mozilla's
(chrome/etc) issues:
opening the JS.C. in the background and make it blink for attention would be
enough to start with. (Well, that's at least a Windows point of view...)
Comment 40•21 years ago
|
||
Disregard my very last sentence: that would be bug 95898 :-<
Having an icon, and single clicking it would be better than nothing !
Maybe, an optional sound could be added to alert the user ??
Comment 41•21 years ago
|
||
I believe that this is key to expand the adoption of Mozilla browsers to a large
scope of end users: so many sites are still unaccessible to Mozilla because of
poor javascript coding and DOM compliance issues, users neeed a way to figure
out immediatelly and easily that an error has occurred, preventing them to
experience correctly the site they are currently browsing.
Without such highlight mecanishm, they will just conclude that Mozilla or
Firefox doesn't work (or they don't know hos to use it properly), and will stop
using it.
A third party extension isn't the right answer for such audience: extensions are
for advanced users (unless some sort of ready to use packaging of extensions is
done by the Mozilla organization towards certain types of users)
Comment 42•21 years ago
|
||
Reassigning obsolete bugs to their respective Seamonkey owners (i.e. nobody).
If you want this fixed for Firefox, change the Product and Component accordingly
and reassign back to me.
Assignee: firefox → guifeatures
Comment 43•21 years ago
|
||
This is a mozilla bug as stated in comment #1, not firefox.
Updated•21 years ago
|
Product: Core → Mozilla Application Suite
Comment 44•18 years ago
|
||
See also bug 400783, same bug for Firefox.
Comment 45•17 years ago
|
||
Filter "spam" on "guifeatures-nobody-20080610".
Assignee: guifeatures → nobody
QA Contact: pawyskoczka → guifeatures
Updated•17 years ago
|
Priority: P3 → --
Comment 46•13 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Olivier Vit (just a reporter) from comment #41)
> I believe that this is key to expand the adoption of Mozilla browsers to a
> large scope of end users: so many sites are still unaccessible to Mozilla because
> of poor javascript coding and DOM compliance issues, users neeed a way to figure
> out immediatelly and easily that an error has occurred, preventing them to
> experience correctly the site they are currently browsing.
> Without such highlight mecanishm, they will just conclude that Mozilla or
> Firefox doesn't work (or they don't know hos to use it properly), and will
> stop using it.
I as a developer also unnecessarily often keep bumping into a situation where I don't spot that the reason for some malfunction X is a JS error, before actually remembering to open Console and check. Smallish laptop screens simply don't permit having the console open all the time.
Last activity seems to be in 2008. This seems to indicate most people interested have some kind of an other solution to this problem external to core products (FF, SeaMonkey, etc)?
Comment 47•12 years ago
|
||
I for one am still having troubles with this. It is one of the few areas in which I think IE does a better job. I went looking for the addon mentioned here and that page link is no longer valid nor does the addon appear to be on AMO. I would like to give the addon a try as I was just going to try doing something like this myself and see no need to re-invent the wheel.
Comment 48•4 years ago
|
||
MY MAC's javascript doesn't work? Does anyone know how to fix this?
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•