Closed
Bug 585195
Opened 14 years ago
Closed 14 years ago
Theme the Web Console filter bar appropriately on Windows
Categories
(Firefox :: Theme, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
Tracking | Status | |
---|---|---|
blocking2.0 | --- | - |
People
(Reporter: pcwalton, Assigned: pcwalton)
References
Details
(Keywords: uiwanted, Whiteboard: [kd4b6] [patchclean:0908])
Attachments
(2 files, 3 obsolete files)
551 bytes,
patch
|
dao
:
review+
Gavin
:
approval2.0+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
102.72 KB,
image/png
|
Details |
It would be nice if the Web Console filter bar looked like a native platform filter bar on Windows. The attached patch does this. It's based on the filter bars in Thunderbird (cf. comm-central/mail/themes/qute/mail/quickFilterBar.css).
Attachment #463672 -
Flags: feedback?(ddahl)
Comment 1•14 years ago
|
||
Can you post a screenshot?
Comment 2•14 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 463672 [details] [diff] [review] Proposed patch. + with screenshot
Attachment #463672 -
Flags: feedback?(ddahl) → feedback+
Assignee | ||
Updated•14 years ago
|
Attachment #463672 -
Flags: review?(dietrich)
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•14 years ago
|
||
Patch rebased to trunk.
Attachment #465068 -
Flags: review?(dietrich)
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•14 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 463672 [details] [diff] [review] Proposed patch. Canceling review on this one because it no longer applies.
Attachment #463672 -
Flags: review?(dietrich)
Comment 5•14 years ago
|
||
Can you attach a screenshot, per comment #2?
Assignee | ||
Comment 6•14 years ago
|
||
Screenshot attached.
Comment 7•14 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 465068 [details] [diff] [review] Proposed patch (trunk rebase 2010-08-11). thanks, looks great. r=me.
Attachment #465068 -
Flags: review?(dietrich) → review+
Comment 8•14 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 465068 [details] [diff] [review] Proposed patch (trunk rebase 2010-08-11). can we get some approval for this?
Attachment #465068 -
Flags: approval2.0?
Updated•14 years ago
|
Attachment #465068 -
Flags: approval2.0? → approval2.0+
Comment 9•14 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 465068 [details] [diff] [review] Proposed patch (trunk rebase 2010-08-11). http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/e751acb410d0
Attachment #465068 -
Attachment description: Proposed patch (trunk rebase 2010-08-11). → [checked-in] Proposed patch (trunk rebase 2010-08-11).
Updated•14 years ago
|
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 14 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Assignee | ||
Comment 10•14 years ago
|
||
This was backed out in revision da59cce7bfa2.
Status: RESOLVED → REOPENED
Resolution: FIXED → ---
Assignee | ||
Updated•14 years ago
|
Keywords: checkin-needed
Updated•14 years ago
|
Component: Developer Tools → Theme
QA Contact: developer.tools → theme
Comment 11•14 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 465068 [details] [diff] [review] Proposed patch (trunk rebase 2010-08-11). >+ background: -moz-linear-gradient(top, #f2f7fd 0, #e9f2fc 12px, #e3eefb 12px, #e3eefb 100%); This is going to look entirely inappropriate on XP, isn't it?
Attachment #465068 -
Flags: review-
Updated•14 years ago
|
Attachment #465068 -
Attachment description: [checked-in] Proposed patch (trunk rebase 2010-08-11). → Proposed patch (trunk rebase 2010-08-11).
Updated•14 years ago
|
Keywords: checkin-needed
Updated•14 years ago
|
Attachment #463672 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Comment 12•14 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #11) > Comment on attachment 465068 [details] [diff] [review] > Proposed patch (trunk rebase 2010-08-11). > > >+ background: -moz-linear-gradient(top, #f2f7fd 0, #e9f2fc 12px, #e3eefb 12px, #e3eefb 100%); > > This is going to look entirely inappropriate on XP, isn't it? Sounds like it will. How do we handle the case of a style for XP and a style for vista/7?
Comment 13•14 years ago
|
||
Before we get into the implementation details, could somebody please point me to a native filter bar example? Thunderbird isn't the best role model for a native app. I don't quite like how this seemingly tries to integrate with the primary toolbars -- it fails halfway, because of the border and because the gradient starts anew. We wouldn't even want it to integrate seamlessly, since the filter bar belongs to content below it rather than the toolbars above it. So just using -moz-appearance: none; background-color: -moz-dialog; for a clean cut might be better.
Comment 14•14 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #13) > Before we get into the implementation details, could somebody please point me > to a native filter bar example? Thunderbird isn't the best role model for a > native app. No idea where to point you:) > > I don't quite like how this seemingly tries to integrate with the primary > toolbars -- it fails halfway, because of the border and because the gradient > starts anew. We wouldn't even want it to integrate seamlessly, since the filter > bar belongs to content below it rather than the toolbars above it. So just > using -moz-appearance: none; background-color: -moz-dialog; for a clean cut > might be better. Sounds like a simpler, better approach.
Keywords: uiwanted
Updated•14 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [kd4b6] [patchclean:0817]
Assignee | ||
Updated•14 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [kd4b6] [patchclean:0817] → [kd4b6] [patchbitrot]
Comment 15•14 years ago
|
||
This should be a blocker, because we want the console to look right on Windows.
Severity: normal → blocker
blocking2.0: --- → ?
Comment 16•14 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #15) > This should be a blocker, because we want the console to look right on Windows. Bug severity is different from release blocking status.
Severity: blocker → trivial
Updated•14 years ago
|
Blocks: devtools4b7
Comment 17•14 years ago
|
||
not going to hold the release for thematic polish on developer-focused non-primary UI, blocking-. earlier patch already has approval. if new changes are ready, carry it over.
blocking2.0: ? → -
Assignee | ||
Comment 18•14 years ago
|
||
New patch address Dao's comments and uses -moz-dialog.
Attachment #465068 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #473098 -
Flags: review?(dietrich)
Attachment #473098 -
Flags: feedback?(dao)
Assignee | ||
Comment 19•14 years ago
|
||
New screenshot posted.
Attachment #465369 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Comment 20•14 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 473098 [details] [diff] [review] [checked-in] Proposed patch, version 2. dao's review here is more appropriate, and enough.
Attachment #473098 -
Flags: review?(dietrich)
Assignee | ||
Updated•14 years ago
|
Attachment #473098 -
Flags: feedback?(dao) → review?(dao)
Assignee | ||
Comment 21•14 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #20) > Comment on attachment 473098 [details] [diff] [review] > Proposed patch, version 2. > > dao's review here is more appropriate, and enough. Okay, switched r? to him.
Assignee | ||
Updated•14 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [kd4b6] [patchbitrot] → [kd4b6] [patchclean:0908]
Updated•14 years ago
|
Attachment #473098 -
Flags: review?(dao) → review+
Comment 22•14 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 473098 [details] [diff] [review] [checked-in] Proposed patch, version 2. Requesting approval for this simple patch that is an important visual improvement on Windows.
Attachment #473098 -
Flags: approval2.0?
Updated•14 years ago
|
Attachment #473098 -
Flags: approval2.0? → approval2.0+
Updated•14 years ago
|
Keywords: checkin-needed
Comment 23•14 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 473098 [details] [diff] [review] [checked-in] Proposed patch, version 2. http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/0425b1e11d2d
Attachment #473098 -
Attachment description: Proposed patch, version 2. → [checked-in] Proposed patch, version 2.
Updated•14 years ago
|
Keywords: checkin-needed
Updated•14 years ago
|
Status: REOPENED → RESOLVED
Closed: 14 years ago → 14 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•