Closed
Bug 58797
Opened 25 years ago
Closed 25 years ago
Preview Image for Skins in Prefs Doesn't Work!
Categories
(Core Graveyard :: Installer: XPInstall Engine, defect, P3)
Core Graveyard
Installer: XPInstall Engine
Tracking
(Not tracked)
VERIFIED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: hewitt, Assigned: hyatt)
Details
(Whiteboard: [rtm-])
Attachments
(1 file)
I recently discovered that user installed themes are copied into a chrome
directory in the user's profile. I previously thought they all got copied into
resource:/chrome/. With this in mind, it is not possible to know the complete
url where the theme preview image can be found.
Currently, in the manifest/confests.rdf file, we put a line like this
chrome:image="jar:resource:///chrome/sky-pilot.jar!/global/skin/preview.png"
to indicate where to find this image. However, I think the installer is going
to need to generate this url when the theme is installed. Instead, we should
say something like this in the rdf:
chrome:image="/global/skin/preview.png"
and the installer should expand that when it generates all-skins.rdf, to
something like this:
chrome:image="jar:file:///C:/DOCUMENTS%20AND%20SETTINGS/ME/APPLICATION%
20DATA/Mozilla/Users50/Joe/chrome/skypilot.jar!/global/skin/preview.png"
Comment 1•25 years ago
|
||
arg, this sucks, storing file: URLs is way bad on a Mac.
Would there be some way to create magic resource: URLs that are not necessarily
taken to be a subdirectory of bin? I don't know what syntax is valid in
the resource: protocol, but something along the lines of
resource:[profile]/chrome/etc. where I'm assuming [] isn't particularly valid
at that point otherwise. Warren: could you chime in with something that would
work here?
Component: Installer: XPI Packages → Installer: XPInstall Engine
Comment 2•25 years ago
|
||
Reasssigning to me.
Not likely to be accepted for fixing in RTM. Might require a change in Necko
and/or the chrome registry. On the other hand not fixing this makes the theme
switching UI pretty poor.
Comment 3•25 years ago
|
||
Reasigning to hyatt to make chrome:image relative, will open a new bug about
needing a resource: URL pointer to the current profile. The latter could wait
for 6.5, the relative image path needs to happen for RTM if we want themes not
to suck
Assignee: dveditz → hyatt
![]() |
Assignee | |
Comment 4•25 years ago
|
||
Comment 6•25 years ago
|
||
r=dveditz
Looks like you made the code work for both the old and new styles. This means
you didn't have to update our skin contents.rdf files in the build which makes
the patch look smaller (while adding an extra "if" line), but this has two
drawbacks. 1) our own skin does not model what we want everyone else to do, and
2) our own skins still exhibit this bug (don't display the image) if you
disable jar packaging since we still have a non-relative jar: URL in the
contents.rdf
I think "safe skins" still have to be restructured a bit from our shipping
skins anyway (my code still looks only for a top-level manifest.rdf :-() so we
can just document that relative image paths should be used. We can fix our own
skins on the trunk.
![]() |
Assignee | |
Updated•25 years ago
|
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Whiteboard: [rtm need info] → [rtm+]
![]() |
Assignee | |
Comment 7•25 years ago
|
||
Changing the summary to make it sound appropriately scary.
Summary: now way to find url to theme preview images → Preview Image for Skins in Prefs Doesn't Work!
![]() |
||
Comment 8•25 years ago
|
||
We really need users to be able to preview skins before they are installed.
There could very reasonably be 50 to 100 themes on the theme park between now
and 6.5 and it would really suck if people had to guess (or remember) which
theme is which before applying. Can we put this on the limbo list?
![]() |
Assignee | |
Comment 9•25 years ago
|
||
If this is refused, we need to at the very least patch the XUL to remove the
useless big blank black spot that will be sitting in the middle of the themes
dialog. :)
Please take it, PDT. I'll do your laundry. I'll walk your dog. I'll cook you
dinner.
![]() |
||
Comment 10•25 years ago
|
||
Do you guys have testing on all platforms?
![]() |
Assignee | |
Comment 11•25 years ago
|
||
I've tested Win and Linux.
![]() |
Assignee | |
Comment 13•25 years ago
|
||
Ok, guess this is fixed then.
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 25 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
![]() |
Assignee | |
Comment 14•25 years ago
|
||
German, Todd. We should market the preview image URL as a "link to a preview
image on the skin author's Web site". If we make it an absolute URL that points
off to a Web site, then this will still work in 6.0.
Including the preview image with the skin, though, will now be a no-no.
Presumably Theme Park can host the preview images, since they will serve them up
as well anyway.
![]() |
||
Comment 16•25 years ago
|
||
Reassinging QA Contact. This bug is more about themes than installation. I did
take a look at this, but I cannot figure out how preview works. I was told
there are some bugs related to this.
QA Contact: jimmylee → pmac
![]() |
||
Comment 17•25 years ago
|
||
After speaking with David Hyatt, this bug is partially fixed. Someone needs
to link the preview image on the skin author's web site.
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
Comment 18•25 years ago
|
||
You should also be able to use a relative URL to an image in the file. Simply
give a partial URL path without a protocol and the base URL of the archive will
be prepended. We should edit modern and classic to do this as well as models,
and Ian should document it.
![]() |
||
Comment 19•25 years ago
|
||
I'm not sure I understand the solution here - does it require theme authors to
host a preview image on their site? If so, I'm not sure if this is the best
solution.
Comment 20•25 years ago
|
||
No, a site link is an option that has *always* worked; that was the WORKAROUND
in 6.0. What this bugfix allows is for the skin to specify a path
relative to the archive (detected by having no ":" in it) so the image can be
taken from the skin itself. This needs to be documented and tested.
![]() |
||
Comment 21•25 years ago
|
||
Gotcha. So in other words, we need to get this info out to theme developers so
that they can build their themes in the way that takes advantage of the fix? In
any event, Patty I don't think we should mark this fixed until we can test that
it works. Paul, can your team take one of our existing themes and modify it so
that it should work, and then Patty can take it and test this out?
Updated•10 years ago
|
Product: Core → Core Graveyard
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•