Closed
Bug 63120
Opened 24 years ago
Closed 24 years ago
Real time thread pane scrolling performance is poor
Categories
(SeaMonkey :: MailNews: Message Display, defect, P1)
SeaMonkey
MailNews: Message Display
Tracking
(Not tracked)
VERIFIED
FIXED
mozilla0.9
People
(Reporter: stephend, Assigned: sspitzer)
References
()
Details
(Keywords: perf, Whiteboard: [nsbeta1+])
It takes us 18.74 seconds on a Windows 95 machine, 133mhz, 64 MB of ram to
scroll 1000 messages in a folder in real-time. Compare this with 1.89 seconds
in Netscape Communicator 4.76 and 2.10 seconds with our competitor on Win32.
Reporter | ||
Comment 1•24 years ago
|
||
Per the executive review, this bug is assigned to mscott. Changing.
Updated•24 years ago
|
Keywords: mozilla1.0
Summary: Real time thread pane scrolling speed performance is poor. → Real time thread pane scrolling performance is poor
Comment 2•24 years ago
|
||
This is a tree performance bug, like all the others...
Comment 3•24 years ago
|
||
What are the others? Do we have some tracking bug for all tree perf bugs?
Reporter | ||
Comment 4•24 years ago
|
||
Reporter | ||
Comment 5•24 years ago
|
||
I've made a mail/news perf tracking bug, for all who care, it's bug # 63759.
I'll be adding descriptions in that bug of each #, for quick reference.
Blocks: 63759
Comment 7•24 years ago
|
||
reassigning to sspitzer. I think there is a mailnews scrolling bug out there,
but it might have been closed already.
marking nsbeta1+ and moving to mozilla0.8, though recognizing that this will
probably be an ongoing bug that get moves to other milestones as time goes on.
Assignee: mscott → sspitzer
Priority: -- → P1
Whiteboard: [nsbeta1+]
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla0.8
Assignee | ||
Comment 8•24 years ago
|
||
adding scott, david and mark to the cc list.
accepting.
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Assignee | ||
Comment 9•24 years ago
|
||
my plan of attack is to start with my own "threadPane.xul", with as few style
rules as possible, that is hard coded to load a 1000 message local folder.
I'll work my way back up to the xul & css & js we have in Messenger, quantifying
at each stage, trying to identity what is slowing down with sorting and
scrolling.
I'll report any findings here.
Comment 10•24 years ago
|
||
I've been doing some work in bug 53620 to improve the performance of style
resolution in general, and I think I have made some good progress toward
speeding up tree scrolling. Setch, it might be worth you while to check out the
patch I've attached there - I have not been able to Quantify it yet, but David
Baron has done some more primitive profiling and saw a significant improvement.
Assignee | ||
Comment 12•24 years ago
|
||
mark, I'm working on multiple delete performance right now.
but don't get me wrong, I'm psyched about the work you are doing in the style
system. I'll try out your patch in #53620 when I get back to this particular
performance problem.
Reporter | ||
Comment 13•24 years ago
|
||
Note: This is already fixed in the mail performance branch. When we merge, I
can verify this as fixed. See the URL above.
Assignee | ||
Comment 14•24 years ago
|
||
fixed.
hats off to hyatt, mscott and bienvenu.
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 24 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Reporter | ||
Comment 15•24 years ago
|
||
VERIFIED FIXED per my results for all platforms at:
http://www.mozilla.org/mailnews/win_performance_results.html If we have
additional enhancements, those need to be filed seperately.
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
Updated•20 years ago
|
Product: Browser → Seamonkey
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•