Closed
Bug 78643
Opened 24 years ago
Closed 24 years ago
fonts where asigned to a wrong width, which makes them overlaping each other.
Categories
(Core :: Layout, defect)
Tracking
()
mozilla0.9.3
People
(Reporter: thomas.scheffler, Assigned: bstell)
References
()
Details
(Keywords: relnote)
Attachments
(2 files)
This problem occurs for me, if a text is rendered in parts with different sizes
and weight such as on the result page of the google page, or if you watch a
table where cellpadding and cellspacing is small enough. The problem is that
some words overdraw others which wasn't obviously meant. This problem first
occurs since I installed mandrake 8.0 but maybe it visible on other
distributions too. I'm using the nvidia driver 769 for my Geforce DDR an the
resolution is set to 1280x1024 (75 dpi). With the latest build (20010502) this
problem still exists.
| Reporter | ||
Comment 1•24 years ago
|
||
in the last nightly build (20010530) the problem still exist.
My configuration is:
NVIDIA GeForce DDR with nvidia's driver ver 1.0.1251
Mandrake 8.0
XFree 4.0.3
This is an extreme ugly bug.
Comment 2•24 years ago
|
||
It's still there in CVS Jun 7, 8 am. I also started seeing this bug with
Mandrake 8.0. It seems to occur with Arial-type fonts.
Comment 3•24 years ago
|
||
I am also seeing this bug, also in Linux-Mandrake 8.0. I have tried a variety
of things to fix this and nothing has helped. I've imported fonts from Windows
to see if those render more properly - to no avail. I'm not sure if it is
restricted to arial type fonts, either - the overlapping of table borders seems
to be regardless of font type.
I do not see this bug in nightly builds on MacOS 9.1 or Win98, so it appears
restricted to Linux, probably LM 8.0. From what I can determine of the font
subsystem, it is using:
XFree86-4.0.3
XFree86-xfs-4.0.3
This is a severe problem for users of Mandrake Linux. I am not entirely
positive that ALL users of LM are affected, but since I've been utterly unable
to fix the problem, I assume most are. It may not be a problem in Mozilla
necessarily, but certainly a compatibility issue. Also note: this problem does
not appear in Netscape Communicator 4.7x using the same fonts on the same system
- so it is not ENTIRELY a problem for LM 8.0.
Comment 4•24 years ago
|
||
Temporary (?) fix found -
In Mozilla, go to Edit~Preferences...~Appearance~Fonts and deselect "Allow
documents to use other fonts". This fixed the problem right away for me (I went
straight to Google and checked). Here's what I don't know: why?
This solution came from alt.os.linux.mandrake - a kind soul had the same problem.
Regards - Brice.
Comment 5•24 years ago
|
||
*** This bug has been confirmed by popular vote. ***
Status: UNCONFIRMED → NEW
Ever confirmed: true
Comment 6•24 years ago
|
||
I think it is a bug in drakfont-0.58-13.1mdk. (I will file a bugreport in their
bugzilla, if there is alread one) This bug appeared first after I updated from
drakfont-0.58-11mdk to this version.
To fix it, do the following:
Replace drakfont-0.58-13.1mdk by the old drakfont-0.58-11mdk with
rpm -Uvh --force drakfont-0.58-11mdk.i586.rpm
Remove the fonts installed with drakfont in /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/drakfont
(you can create a backup of this directory if you like) with
drakfont -k
(Might be necessary:
Restart xfs with
/etc/rc.d/init.d/xfs stop
/etc/rc.d/init.d/xfs start
)
Add the fonts again with drakfont.
Restart mozilla.
Now a pages are displayed correctly again.
Comment 8•24 years ago
|
||
It seems we need to address this in the release not. Move to bstell and target
moz1.0 for release note.
Comment 9•24 years ago
|
||
FWIW, I'm using drakfont-0.58-11mdk and I still see the problem. Deselecting the
"Use other fonts" options works, though, but I find that the documents look much
less interesting.
Comment 10•24 years ago
|
||
In fact I now also think that it's not the version of drakfont but the windows
fonts themselves. I got rid of the bug be removing my windows fonts on the linux
side with drakfont -k and reinstall them again from my windows partition. A
guess: Before I had reinstalled the 16 bit versions of the fonts which can be
downloaded from the microsoft website were (also) installed. Now I have
installed only the 32bit versions. At the moment I do not have the link to the
corresponding microsoft site, but I can search for it.
Comment 11•24 years ago
|
||
Yes, I'd like that. My fonts were taken from my Win2K installation. Aren't those
supposed to be 32bit fonts?
Comment 12•24 years ago
|
||
Here is a list of the fonts which work:
AriBlk.ttf Georgiaz.ttf Verdana.ttf arial.ttf courbi.ttf times.ttf
Comic.ttf Impact.ttf Verdanab.ttf arialbd.ttf couri.ttf timesbd.ttf
ComicBD.ttf Trebuc.ttf Verdanai.ttf arialbi.ttf fonts.dir timesbi.ttf
Georgia.ttf Trebucbd.ttf Verdanaz.ttf ariali.ttf l_10646.ttf timesi.ttf
Georgiab.ttf Trebucbi.ttf Webdings.ttf cour.ttf lucon.ttf
Georgiai.ttf Trebucit.ttf andalemo.ttf courbd.ttf symbol.ttf
This is a list of the old fonts, which didn't work.
ARIAL.ttf Georgiaz.ttf Webdings.ttf courbi.ttf starmath.ttf
ARIALBD.ttf Impact.ttf andalemo.ttf couri.ttf symbol.ttf
ARIALBI.ttf TIMES.ttf arial.ttf fonts.dir tahoma.ttf
ARIALI.ttf TIMESBD.ttf arialbd.ttf helb____.ttf timb____.ttf
AriBlk.ttf TIMESBI.ttf arialbi.ttf helbi___.ttf timbi___.ttf
COUR.ttf TIMESI.ttf ariali.ttf helcb___.ttf times.ttf
COURBD.ttf Trebuc.ttf arib____.ttf helcbi__.ttf timesbd.ttf
COURBI.ttf Trebucbd.ttf arir____.ttf helci___.ttf timesbi.ttf
COURI.ttf Trebucbi.ttf chvor___.ttf helcr___.ttf timesi.ttf
Comic.ttf Trebucit.ttf chvr____.ttf heli____.ttf timi____.ttf
ComicBD.ttf Verdana.ttf cogb____.ttf helr____.ttf timr____.ttf
Georgia.ttf Verdanab.ttf cogr____.ttf l_10646.ttf wingding.ttf
Georgiab.ttf Verdanai.ttf cour.ttf lucon.ttf
Georgiai.ttf Verdanaz.ttf courbd.ttf starbats.ttf
I guess, one (or more) of them is somehow broken. When I reinstall all these
fonts, the same error reappears.
| Assignee | ||
Comment 13•24 years ago
|
||
is this the same bug as 59915?
Comment 14•24 years ago
|
||
Yes, it would certainly appear that this bug is a duplicate of 59915 (though
approached slightly differently).
Comment 15•24 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 59915 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 16•24 years ago
|
||
I have seen these problems with RedHat 6.2 and XFree86 from CVS
(tested all the 4.0.x versions).
The page I have most often seen problems with is:
http://www.zdnet.com
Comment 17•24 years ago
|
||
What's staus on this: I'm seeing this on www.mozillazine.org quite often :(
| Assignee | ||
Comment 18•24 years ago
|
||
It's on my list of things I to look (near the top).
I'd like to fix it but with the current state of checkin restrictions
(fix must be very low risk) from now till moz 1.0 I will not know if a fix
is possible before then.
Comment 19•24 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 88219 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
| Assignee | ||
Comment 20•24 years ago
|
||
just for the record:
I am very interested in this as I really want to move the Linux Moz
client to newer outline font technology.
I just got a new system to run Redhat 7.1 on and as soon as it is up
an fully running I will look at this bug.
Comment 21•24 years ago
|
||
On that note - I'd love to help out with getting Mozilla to use rendered fonts
(I assume that's what you referred to?). I have a XF4.1 setup that works with
rendered fonts and I can help test things or whatever else you might have me do.
I've been wanting to get involved in Moz for a while, but haven't found an area
that I'm really interested in :). This is definitely one of those areas.
Getting Moz on Linux to look as nice as Moz on my Mac (OS 9.1) w/ ATM rendered
fonts would be seriously sweet.
Sign me up.
Comment 22•24 years ago
|
||
I am getting this too. I also have Mandrake 8 but did not have a problem until
downloading Mozilla 0.9.2
Fonts overlap each other and so do frames. For example I was looking at the
story about John Le Carre in the Sunday Times (www.sunday-times.co.uk) and the
picture of his father was cutting off the ends of all of the adjacent words. I
assume that this is a tweak to the rendering engine but I don't have a clue really!
Comment 23•24 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 87886 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
| Assignee | ||
Comment 25•24 years ago
|
||
Steven:
1) If you use a 0.9.1 build does the problem go away?
2) Do you have true type fonts loaded on your system?
Comment 26•24 years ago
|
||
This bug is a problem for me too (I'm using Mandrake 8, Mozilla 0.9.1). It only
seems to happen with TrueType fonts, though. I have not tried any of the
mentioned workarounds, nor Mozilla 0.9.2.
| Assignee | ||
Comment 27•24 years ago
|
||
| Assignee | ||
Comment 28•24 years ago
|
||
| Assignee | ||
Comment 29•24 years ago
|
||
I got the freetype font from bug 63831:
> ------- Additional Comments From Stanislav Brabec 2001-04-05 15:37 -------
> ...
> I have placed few problematic fonts at
> ftp://ftp.penguin.cz/pub/users/utx/temp/X11_winfonts.tar.gz
> You can download them, add then to fontpath, restart mozilla
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Target Milestone: mozilla1.0 → mozilla0.9.3
| Assignee | ||
Comment 30•24 years ago
|
||
can one of the developers who see this problem try this fix for bug 63831
http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/showattachment.cgi?attach_id=41534
and see if it also fixes this bug?
thanks
| Assignee | ||
Comment 31•24 years ago
|
||
Jacek: what are the other bug numbers?
Comment 32•24 years ago
|
||
The problem is clearly some difference of 16 and 32 bit fonts, I upgraded main
truetype fonts to current versions (should be 32-bit...) with a TT-fetching
script that SuSE provide in their distribution (so that all their users can get
to use TT fonts, fetching directly from M$) - and now Moz displays everything OK!
| Assignee | ||
Comment 33•24 years ago
|
||
the fix for bug 63831 (now checked in) should fix this.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 63831 ***
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 24 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•