Closed Bug 80383 Opened 24 years ago Closed 23 years ago

Install must delete component.reg and xpti.dat on upgrade

Categories

(Core Graveyard :: Installer: XPInstall Engine, defect)

x86
All
defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

(Not tracked)

VERIFIED FIXED
mozilla0.9.1

People

(Reporter: rossi, Assigned: slogan)

References

()

Details

(Keywords: regression, Whiteboard: fix in handing. waiting for drivers to approve for branch and trunk checkin)

Attachments

(7 files)

From Bugzilla Helper: User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win 9x 4.90; en-US; rv:0.9+) Gecko/20010511 BuildID: 2001051104 something like InstallTrigger.installChrome(...) results in javascript error "InstallTrigger is not defined" Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. open the url 2. click on "import" 3. open javascript console and read the error message Actual Results: javascript error "InstallTrigger is not defined" Expected Results: popup with question whether to install theme or not
Browser, not engine. Reassigning to Installer component -
Assignee: rogerl → ssu
Component: Javascript Engine → Installer
QA Contact: pschwartau → gemal
This is the sort of thing that could have gotten broken by the xpcdom landing, however this particular case WORKSFORME on windows NT in the same 2001051104 build. Could we get a confirmation of this bug on Win9x/ME please?
Assignee: ssu → syd
Component: Installer → Installer: XPInstall Engine
QA Contact: gemal → jimmylee
This was most likely caused by the XPCDOM landing, but I don't know exactly what the deal is. I know that I saw this, then I removed components/xpti* and component.reg and things started working, why I don't know.
i can confirm the bug with 2001051308 on a totally different pc with windoze me and i can also confirm the workaround from Johnny Stenback (delete component.reg and components/xpti*)...
Confirming, this needs to be addressed if people are supposed to be able to update a Netscape 6.0(1) installation to the next release. I saw this on Win2k.
Status: UNCONFIRMED → NEW
Ever confirmed: true
OS: Windows ME → All
This bug manifested itself as our InstallTrigger object not defined. The install scripts (all platforms) have to delete component.reg and xpti.dat files to force them to be rebuilt
Keywords: nsbeta1nsbeta1+, regression
Summary: InstallTrigger is not defined → Install must delete component.reg and xpti.dat on upgrade
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla0.9.1
Whiteboard: [smartupdate]
taking this bug
Assignee: syd → ssu
got r=sgehani for all patches.
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
sr=mscott
patches checked in.
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 23 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Build: 2001-05-23-08-trunk(LINUX), 2001-05-23-06-trunk(WIN), 2001-05-23-08-trunk(MAC) Looks good on all platforms. Marking Verified!
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
Reopening bug :-( This appears to work fine if for the wizard installer. There appears to be a problem when upgrading from website say like SmartUpdate. The component.reg does not seem to get deleted. There may be a conflict with Bug 65678. That fix is attempting to cleanup, and component.reg appears to still be held open thus being unable to complete its task.
Status: VERIFIED → REOPENED
Resolution: FIXED → ---
reassigning to Don. He seems to have found the problem.
Assignee: ssu → dbragg
Status: REOPENED → NEW
Blocks: 65678
Ok, here's the deal. In nsRegistry.cpp we call nsRegistry::OpenWellKnownRegistry which opens component.reg using NR_RegOpen(). This file is open for the entire duration of the program. NR_RegClose() is only called when the nsRegistry destructor is called. For some reason either this isn't getting called or the OS thinks that since a "child" process was spawned that files open in the parent process will remain open. It's weird.
I was right with the second case (OS keeping the file open). It's not really keeping the file open it's just that PR_CreateProcess passes the file descriptors from the parent to the child. This cannot be controlled by the client calling PR_CreateProcess. This bug is not really an xpinstall or cleanup bug. It's really a limitation of nspr's CreateProcess but I'll continue to try to find a way to fix it. Here are some possible ways to fix it in order of complexity: 1. Change NSPR's PR_CreateProcess (windows implementation) to NOT pass the file descriptors to the child process. This is the easiest fix but there might be some ramifications. 2. Add a new PR_CreateProcessNoDescriptors (or something more elegant) that doesn't pass the file descriptors. This would require changing nsIProcess and it's implementation. 3. Add a variable to PR_CreateProcess to allow the client's to specify if they want to pass file descriptors. Same as #2. You'd want to make this a default value so you wouldn't have to change everyone calling PR_CreateProcess. 4. Figure out how to close the registry file early. This solution would really only fix this particular case. There's the general case of the files being held open that could easily come up again. 5. Figure out how to get a list of the file descriptors in the child process and close them. This would be a windows-only solution. It would work for xpicleanup because each of the utilities is platform-specific. In reading the MSVC docs it looks like you could do this in 16-bit windows but I haven't found how to do it in 9x and NT. Need a Windows guru to help. I feel this one is a hack. 6. Fix the problem correctly that deleting component.reg worksaround. I don't know what that problem is but I hear it's a big one.
Actually, this is the kind of thing you have to do with fcntl(). In Unix you can call fcntl() on an fd and make it not inheritable by a child process: F_SETFD Set the file descriptor flags defined in <fcntl.h>, that are associated with fildes, to the third argument, arg, taken as type int. If the FD_CLOEXEC flag in the third argument is 0, the file will remain open across the exec() functions; otherwise the file will be closed upon successful execution of one of the exec() functions. Looks like nspr has picked up on the concept: <snip> extern PRStatus _MD_set_fd_inheritable(PRFileDesc *fd, PRBool inheritable); #define _MD_SET_FD_INHERITABLE _MD_set_fd_inheritable </snip> If "inheritable" is PR_FALSE, the above mention fcntl is invoked. For the less important OSes, we also have: http://lxr.mozilla.org/seamonkey/source/nsprpub/pr/src/md/windows/ntio.c#2660 http://lxr.mozilla.org/seamonkey/source/nsprpub/pr/src/md/windows/w95io.c#889 Unfortunately, the win95 call will fail, as the function that it blindly calls, SetHandleInformation(), is not supported on 95/98. On the otherhand, the Win32 CreateProcess() function does support an argument, inherithandles, that we are blindly setting to TRUE when we create a process, see: http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/psdk/winbase/prothred_9dpv.htm for a description of create process, and http://lxr.mozilla.org/seamonkey/source/nsprpub/pr/src/md/windows/ntmisc.c#345 for our implementation. From what I see, since you need a fcntl() in Unix and the best win32 way is to specify at process creation time, that there is not going to be a really clean way of doing this. Well, perhaps the createprocessnoinherit idea might work if on winblows platforms you set the flag on CreateProcess correctly, and for Unix you walked the descriptor table and called fcntl on all open descriptors before calling fork/exec. Again, on Mac, who cares :-) I don't know, perhaps we should #ifdef XP_UNIX and do the fcntl() thing on all files we open, and #ifdef XP_WIN and just call CreateProcess() ourselves and set the flag as we need to so that file descriptors are not inherited. And leave everything else alone. Until nspr comes up with a more elegant solution. cc'ing wtc
OK, I see we are calling nsIProcess for this. So, I was thinking we could add an argument to nsIProcess::Init to specify that files should (not) be inherited. If this flag is set at process creation time, we can walk the fds on Unix and call fcntl() to set the non-inheritance flag (via the nspr abstraction) until we hit some max fd (1024 and 4096 are usual system limits) or until we get a EBADF error return. For windows, we can replace the call to nspr's process creation routine with our own call to win32 CreateProcess() which has the inherit handles flag set the way we want it to be set. But I looked at the size of _PR_CreateWindowProcess() and associated helper routines and I think a better thing would be to get a contribution from nspr, I just don't feel right cloning all of that code. If that can't happen then we will roll our own...
Syd, Is the philosophy here to get this running for beta and then change it afterwards? I'm sure you don't like that solution as much as I don't. I posted to the nspr newsgroup about possibly changing the implementation of CreateProcess on Windows to "blindly" pass FALSE instead of TRUE for the inherit param. No reponses yet. Is wtc the master of that domain? I believe this is as much (or more)of an NSPR issue than an installer issue. I'd like to escalate this to determine the right course of action before I blindly start duping a bunch of NSPR code in xpcom's nsIProcess. Who do we need to get on this discussion?
Whiteboard: [smartupdate] → [smartupdate] No ETA yet, investigating.
Yeah, the parts of the patch that imply pasting could very well be calls to the new and improved nspr functions. Just want to make that clear. I agree we best have nspr fix this but if we are talking about a stop ship bug and nspr is not able to assist, and if this is deemed the best solution (i.e., causing the children to not inherit fds), and this is the only way to accomplish it, then perhaps our temporarily implementing the solution in installer space somewhere is the right thing. wtc is the man on this, yep.
I can add a new attribute for PR_CreateProcess that says "the child process will not inherit any file descriptors from the parent." The implementation of this attribute is trivial on Windows (just pass FALSE as the bInheritHandles argument to CreateProcess) but is expensive on Unix as it needs to close all the fd's in the child process before calling exec(). Are you sure you want to do that? All you really need to do is to make sure the fd for component.reg is not inherited by child processes. I would modify NR_RegOpen() so that it opens the component.reg file as non-inheritable. This would require platform-specific code.
I just spoke with QA today (Jimmy Lee). He said the problem is not happening on Unix. Perhaps for beta we could just change the Windows call to pass FALSE in ntmisc.c. Or if that's to risky could we do what Wan-Teh says just for windows?
Attached patch Patch to trySplinter Review
Just built and tested Syd'd patch. Looks fab. The bug would be fixed with this patch. Syd: were you going to factor out the common code or should I just review the patch as-is?
Just tested on Windows ME and looks good there too. r=dbragg
sr=mscott
assigning to me
Assignee: dbragg → syd
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Whiteboard: [smartupdate] No ETA yet, investigating. → fix in handing. waiting for drivers to approve for branch checkin
Whiteboard: fix in handing. waiting for drivers to approve for branch checkin → fix in handing. waiting for drivers to approve for branch and trunk checkin
a= asa@mozilla.org for checkin to 0.9.1
Fix checked in 0.9.1 branch and trunk
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 23 years ago23 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Build: 2001-06-05-11-0.9.1(WIN), 2001-06-05-04-0.9.1(LINUX), 2001-06-05-03-0.9.1(MAC) This looks good on Windows NT, Windows 98, and Linux. However, I have stumbled into Bug 84236 which blocks me from verifying this fix on Macintosh. Will add vtrunk keyword when Macintosh has been verified.
Depends on: 84236
Build: 2001-06-07-11-0.9.1(MAC) Verified on Mac. I got around Bug 84236 by installing each xpi package one at a time. Adding vtrunk to keywords.
Keywords: vtrunk
Build: 2001-08-01-08-trunk(LINUX), 2001-08-01-08-trunk(MAC), 2001-08-01-06-trunk(WIN) Works fine on the trunk. Removing keyword "vtrunk". Marking Verified.
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
Keywords: vtrunk
Product: Core → Core Graveyard
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Creator:
Created:
Updated:
Size: