Closed
Bug 869368
Opened 11 years ago
Closed 11 years ago
Flash elements are not correctly displayed and positioned in page on Gingerbread devices
Categories
(Firefox for Android Graveyard :: Plugins, defect)
Tracking
(firefox21 unaffected, firefox22 unaffected, firefox23 wontfix, firefox24-, firefox26 wontfix, firefox27 wontfix, firefox28 verified, firefox29 verified, b2g-v1.3 fixed, fennec26+)
VERIFIED
FIXED
Firefox 29
Tracking | Status | |
---|---|---|
firefox21 | --- | unaffected |
firefox22 | --- | unaffected |
firefox23 | --- | wontfix |
firefox24 | - | --- |
firefox26 | --- | wontfix |
firefox27 | --- | wontfix |
firefox28 | --- | verified |
firefox29 | --- | verified |
b2g-v1.3 | --- | fixed |
fennec | 26+ | --- |
People
(Reporter: AdrianT, Assigned: snorp)
References
()
Details
(Keywords: regression)
Attachments
(3 files, 1 obsolete file)
20.82 KB,
image/png
|
Details | |
17.86 KB,
image/png
|
Details | |
2.32 KB,
patch
|
cwiiis
:
review+
lsblakk
:
approval-mozilla-beta+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
Nightly 23.0a1 2013-05-06 Samsung Galaxy R (Android 2.3.4)/ HTC Desire Z (Android 2.3.3) Steps to reproduce: 1) Go to http://people.mozilla.org/~mwargers/tests/flash/flashembed.html and wait for the page to load 2) Activate the flash plugin if needed Expected results: The 2 flash elements are correctly displayed Actual results: The 2 flash elements are detached from there placeholder positions Notes: This is not reproducible on Honeycomb, ICS or JB
Comment 1•11 years ago
|
||
Can you find a regression-window?
Updated•11 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → snorp
tracking-fennec: ? → 23+
Comment 2•11 years ago
|
||
The regression window for this issue is the same as Bug 869366: 1. mozilla central good build: 24.04.2013 bad build: 25.04.2013 pushlog: http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/pushloghtml?fromchange=fef5f202b2dc&tochange=690b5e0f6562 2. inbound good build: 1366820270 bad build: 1366820510 pushlog: http://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/pushloghtml?fromchange=a4fc2d70eade&tochange=450bbfd48532 This seems to have been caused by bug 549697.
Flags: needinfo?(adrian.tamas)
Keywords: regressionwindow-wanted
Comment 3•11 years ago
|
||
I'd really love to get a one changeset regression window. Kevin said he can do that, so thank you Kevin.
Flags: needinfo?(kbrosnan)
Updated•11 years ago
|
tracking-firefox24:
--- → ?
Comment 5•11 years ago
|
||
Do we know real world websites that are impacted for us to track for future release given we shipped this regression in Fx23 ?
Reporter | ||
Comment 6•11 years ago
|
||
This affects any website that has flash content on it. There are no top sites I can think of that use flash but any website I find with flash content experiences this problem(for e.g www.zign.com.br - the top part of the website is cut-off).
Comment 7•11 years ago
|
||
Will consider a low risk uplift when ready but no need to track given none of the top-sites are known to be impacted.Aaron feel feel to renom in case this was nominated based on the user feedback that we may have got for Fx23 or if I am misunderstanding the impact here.
Comment 8•11 years ago
|
||
David, why does this depend on bug 833977? Do you have a plan for how to resolve this?
Flags: needinfo?(dkeeler)
My understanding is this bug only applies to gingerbread devices. I don't have a gingerbread device, so I was trying to use the emulator. Unfortunately, the emulator doesn't work (bug 833977). My current plan is to put gingerbread on an unagi. I've had little success with this so far. If someone has a gingerbread device they can loan me for a bit, that would speed things up.
Flags: needinfo?(dkeeler)
Comment 10•11 years ago
|
||
David, where are you located? Can you ping me on irc so we can find you a device?
Flags: needinfo?(dkeeler)
(In reply to Brad Lassey [:blassey] (use needinfo?) from comment #10) > David, where are you located? Can you ping me on irc so we can find you a > device? I'm in Portland. I didn't see you on irc today. Feel free to email me or ping me on irc tomorrow.
Flags: needinfo?(dkeeler)
Updated•11 years ago
|
tracking-fennec: 23+ → ?
Flags: needinfo?(kbrosnan)
Comment 13•11 years ago
|
||
Will this device suffice? I have one here in MV: http://www.gsmarena.com/sony_ericsson_xperia_play-3608.php and will ship it out today to the Portland office, if so.
Flags: needinfo?(blassey.bugs)
Updated•11 years ago
|
Flags: needinfo?(elancaster)
Comment 14•11 years ago
|
||
Talked to Erin on IRC. The Xperia play is certainly a unique device, so she's just going to make sure it reproduces before shipping it out.
Flags: needinfo?(blassey.bugs)
Comment 15•11 years ago
|
||
Comment 16•11 years ago
|
||
Doesn't look like it repros, let me see what other GB device I can drum up, I may need kbrosnan's help to simply send loaner a phone...
Flags: needinfo?(kbrosnan)
Comment 17•11 years ago
|
||
Ok, it does repro once you actually tap. I didn't get proper str on that first round. yay. sending to portland today.
Attachment #823603 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Comment 18•11 years ago
|
||
Yes you need to either have Flash set to always play or tap the box to enable flash for that page.
Flags: needinfo?(kbrosnan)
Comment 19•11 years ago
|
||
FedEx Tracking number for :Keeler: 562632717010
Updated•11 years ago
|
tracking-fennec: ? → 26+
As far as I can tell, the regression is in changeset 684a5ca2efb7, pointing to bug 858969, not bug 549697.
Comment 21•11 years ago
|
||
Over to Chris then
Assignee: nobody → chrislord.net
Flags: needinfo?(blassey.bugs)
Updated•11 years ago
|
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Comment 22•11 years ago
|
||
I take it this isn't being worked on for 26.
Comment 23•11 years ago
|
||
Argh, so it turns out the only gingerbread device I have is armv6 and Flash isn't available there... Are there any developers with such a device? (armv7, gingerbread) I could likely point out what bits of code need fiddling with, but I have no way to test atm.
Flags: needinfo?(blassey.bugs)
Assignee | ||
Comment 24•11 years ago
|
||
Assignee | ||
Updated•11 years ago
|
Attachment #8349489 -
Flags: review?(chrislord.net)
Comment 25•11 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8349489 [details] [diff] [review] Fix Flash plugin positioning on Android 2.3 Review of attachment 8349489 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- Looks good to me :) I'd be careful to test that this works when you've pinch-zoomed too, but I'll assume you've done that.
Attachment #8349489 -
Flags: review?(chrislord.net) → review+
Updated•11 years ago
|
Assignee: chrislord.net → snorp
Flags: needinfo?(blassey.bugs)
Assignee | ||
Comment 26•11 years ago
|
||
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/eac0c33eeebe
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/eac0c33eeebe
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 11 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → Firefox 29
Comment 28•11 years ago
|
||
I can still see this on Fx 26 Beta 4. Will we uplift it? I can confirm this is verified fixed using Nightly 29.0a1 (2014-01-08) on HTC Desire HD (Android 2.3.1) with the page: http://hybridmind.com/tutorials/simple-as3-viewport-tutorial/ (http://goo.gl/iNAJT)
status-firefox26:
--- → affected
status-firefox27:
--- → affected
status-firefox28:
--- → affected
status-firefox29:
--- → verified
Comment 29•11 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Ioana Chiorean from comment #28) > I can still see this on Fx 26 Beta 4. Will we uplift it? Of course I mean Fx 27 Beta 4 :)
Updated•11 years ago
|
Flags: needinfo?(snorp)
Assignee | ||
Comment 30•10 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8349489 [details] [diff] [review] Fix Flash plugin positioning on Android 2.3 [Approval Request Comment] Bug caused by (feature/regressing bug #): ? User impact if declined: Busted Flash positioning on 2.2/2.3 Testing completed (on m-c, etc.): m-c, aurora Risk to taking this patch (and alternatives if risky): None String or IDL/UUID changes made by this patch: None
Attachment #8349489 -
Flags: approval-mozilla-beta?
Flags: needinfo?(snorp)
Comment 31•10 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8349489 [details] [diff] [review] Fix Flash plugin positioning on Android 2.3 will approve since we're early in Beta
Attachment #8349489 -
Flags: approval-mozilla-beta? → approval-mozilla-beta+
Updated•10 years ago
|
status-b2g-v1.3:
--- → fixed
Comment 34•10 years ago
|
||
Verified on: HTC Desire HD (Android 2.3.5) Firefox 28.0b2(2014-02-10)
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
Updated•6 years ago
|
Product: Firefox for Android → Firefox for Android Graveyard
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•