Bug 1494772 Comment 15 Edit History

Note: The actual edited comment in the bug view page will always show the original commenter’s name and original timestamp.

Unfortunately I don't have a Proton account to check the icons when logged in, the login page icon works fine so I can't tell what's up. They should provide either an svg, or both 16px and 32px icons.

To make an example of why I say the sites are serving bad icons, Whatsapp serves https://web.whatsapp.com/img/favicon/1x/favicon.png that is a 16px icon not suitable for an hi-dpi monitor that needs at least a 32px icon to avoid showing a blurry mess.
Let alone sites that are serving icons with `no-store` and then complain we don't store them (not this case, but it's quite common).
Unfortunately I don't have a Proton account to check the icons when logged in, the login page icon works fine so I can't tell what's up. They should provide either an svg, or both 16px and 32px icons.

To make an example of why I say the sites are serving bad icons, Whatsapp serves https://web.whatsapp.com/img/favicon/1x/favicon.png that is a 16px icon not suitable for an hi-dpi monitor that needs at least a 32px icon to avoid showing a blurry mess. (we'll fix the whatsapp case whosing a blurry icon in the future, as it looks like that's what they want)
Let alone sites that are serving icons with `no-store` and then complain we don't store them (not this case, but it's quite common).
Unfortunately I don't have a Proton account to check the icons when logged in, the login page icon works fine so I can't tell what's up. They should provide either an svg, or both 16px and 32px icons.

To make an example of why I say the sites are serving bad icons, Whatsapp serves https://web.whatsapp.com/img/favicon/1x/favicon.png that is a 16px icon not suitable for an hi-dpi monitor that needs at least a 32px icon to avoid showing a blurry mess. (we'll fix the whatsapp case showing a blurry icon in the future, as it looks like that's what they want)
Let alone sites that are serving icons with `no-store` and then complain we don't store them (not this case, but it's quite common).

Back to Bug 1494772 Comment 15