### Beta/Release Uplift Approval Request * **Feature/Bug causing the regression**: N/A * **User impact if declined**: Not really user facing, but continued use of the old search code has its revenue implications * **Is this code covered by automated tests?**: No * **Has the fix been verified in Nightly?**: No * **Needs manual test from QE?**: No * **If yes, steps to reproduce**: Sorry but I’ve not been able to properly verify this due to travels planned around a public holiday in China (Friday Apr. 5th), I’m asking others in my team to help verifying this during the weekend. * **List of other uplifts needed**: N/A * **Risk to taking this patch**: Low * **Why is the change risky/not risky? (and alternatives if risky)**: Simple text replacement w/o any real logic change * **String changes made/needed**: N/A
Bug 1540017 Comment 9 Edit History
Note: The actual edited comment in the bug view page will always show the original commenter’s name and original timestamp.
### Beta/Release Uplift Approval Request * **Feature/Bug causing the regression**: N/A * **User impact if declined**: Not really user facing, but continued use of the old search code has its revenue implications * **Is this code covered by automated tests?**: No * **Has the fix been verified in Nightly?**: Yes, see comment 14 * **Needs manual test from QE?**: No, not needed from global QE team, we’ll handle it from Beijing office * **If yes, steps to reproduce**: N/A * **List of other uplifts needed**: N/A * **Risk to taking this patch**: Low * **Why is the change risky/not risky? (and alternatives if risky)**: Simple text replacement w/o any real logic change * **String changes made/needed**: N/A