The "funny" thing is: 2 days later my unchanged webextension button seems to use now the first CSS rule
´´´
.toolbarbutton-1 .toolbarbutton-icon {
width: 18px;
height: 18px;
}
´´´´
instead of the prior used CSS rule:
´´´
.webextension-action > .toolbarbutton-badge-stack > .toolbarbutton-icon {
height: 16px;
width: 16px;
}
´´´
And the button size seems to be fixed without your patch (in my test profiles for Tb Daily and Tb Beta), which is in yesterdays comm-central build. In my test profile for Tb 68.2.2 the button icon is still to small and not fixed in a "magical" way.
Nevertheless, the patch seems to be correct and necessary to be checked-in for comm-beta and comm-esr.
Bug 1598955 Comment 4 Edit History
Note: The actual edited comment in the bug view page will always show the original commenter’s name and original timestamp.
The "funny" thing is: 2 days later my unchanged webextension button seems to use now the first CSS rule
```
.toolbarbutton-1 .toolbarbutton-icon {
width: 18px;
height: 18px;
}
```
instead of the prior used CSS rule:
```
.webextension-action > .toolbarbutton-badge-stack > .toolbarbutton-icon {
height: 16px;
width: 16px;
}
```
And the button size seems to be fixed without your patch (in my test profiles for Tb Daily and Tb Beta), which is in yesterdays comm-central build. In my test profile for Tb 68.2.2 the button icon is still to small and not fixed in a "magical" way.
Nevertheless, the patch seems to be correct and necessary to be checked-in for comm-beta and comm-esr.
The "funny" thing is: 2 days later my unchanged webextension button seems to use now the first CSS rule
``` css
.toolbarbutton-1 .toolbarbutton-icon {
width: 18px;
height: 18px;
}
```
instead of the prior used CSS rule:
``` css
.webextension-action > .toolbarbutton-badge-stack > .toolbarbutton-icon {
height: 16px;
width: 16px;
}
```
And the button size seems to be fixed without your patch (in my test profiles for Tb Daily and Tb Beta), which is in yesterdays comm-central build. In my test profile for Tb 68.2.2 the button icon is still to small and not fixed in a "magical" way.
Nevertheless, the patch seems to be correct and necessary to be checked-in for comm-beta and comm-esr.