We were discussing whether we should keep the "omniscient" nickname when enabling the feature. It really feels like an internal codename, and we are concerned about localization issues for such as name. Proposals were: - `Browser Toolbox` (but we lack any distinction between the default one and the new one) - `Browser Toolbox + some meaningful emoji` (hard to find a good emoji to convey the meaning) - `Browser Toolbox (all processes)` (not easy to identify, not really a name) - `Multi-process Browser Toolbox` (might make people think this is a BT that uses several processes) For now I feel like `Multi-process Browser Toolbox` is the best proposal here, so I am going to use it here. But feel free to keep suggestions coming!
Bug 1603366 Comment 1 Edit History
Note: The actual edited comment in the bug view page will always show the original commenter’s name and original timestamp.
We were discussing whether we should keep the "omniscient" nickname when enabling the feature. It really feels like an internal codename, and we are concerned about localization issues for such a name. Proposals were: - `Browser Toolbox` (but we lack any distinction between the default one and the new one) - `Browser Toolbox + some meaningful emoji` (hard to find a good emoji to convey the meaning) - `Browser Toolbox (all processes)` (not easy to identify, not really a name) - `Multi-process Browser Toolbox` (might make people think this is a BT that uses several processes) For now I feel like `Multi-process Browser Toolbox` is the best proposal here, so I am going to use it here. But feel free to keep suggestions coming!