Might be good to look into standardizing the `WIP` flag -- e.g. if it commit message starts with `WIP:` mark it is draft, or if either `--wip` is passed or a draft revision is detected during `submit` make sure the first line starts with `WIP:`.
Bug 1610403 Comment 2 Edit History
Note: The actual edited comment in the bug view page will always show the original commenter’s name and original timestamp.
Might be good to look into standardizing the `WIP` flag -- e.g. if it commit message starts with `WIP:` as suggested, mark it is draft, or if either `--wip` is passed or a draft revision is detected during `submit` make sure to prepend the first line starts with `WIP:` if it's not already there.