(In reply to Acasandrei Beatrice from comment #4) > I can confirm that this bug is still reproducing. The minimum length of the labels should be at least 11 characters (excluding the floating point). Talking with Beatrice, we realized we haven't properly tested the Graphs view for these big values. After a 2nd look, it seems the bug isn't reproducing. At least, not for the kind of data :glandium presented (series from build_metrics, on Windows & Linux platforms). :glandium, are you ok with closing this as WORKSFORME? Or have you still reproduced bug this lately?
Bug 1632730 Comment 9 Edit History
Note: The actual edited comment in the bug view page will always show the original commenter’s name and original timestamp.
(In reply to Acasandrei Beatrice from comment #4) > I can confirm that this bug is still reproducing. The minimum length of the labels should be at least 11 characters (excluding the floating point). Talking with Beatrice, we realized we haven't properly tested the Graphs view for these big values. After a 2nd look, it seems the bug isn't reproducing. At least, not for the kind of data :glandium presented (series from build_metrics, on Windows & Linux platforms). :glandium, are you ok with closing this as WORKSFORME? Or have you still reproduced this bug lately?
(In reply to Acasandrei Beatrice from comment #4) > I can confirm that this bug is still reproducing. The minimum length of the labels should be at least 11 characters (excluding the floating point). Talking with Beatrice, we realized we haven't properly tested the Graphs view for these big values. After a 2nd look, it seems the bug isn't reproducing. At least, not for the kind of data :glandium presented (series from build_metrics, on Windows & Linux platforms). :glandium, are you ok with closing this as WORKSFORME? Or have you still encountered this bug lately?