(In reply to Boris Chiou [:boris] from comment #4) > BTW, it seems test_animation_omta.html is failed in [XOrigin sheet](https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/16G5AZhHWWow3rBgim4QBHzWXMIIJiky2SzXYgDMTTKY/edit#gid=1259287422). Not sure if it is related. test_animation_omta.html has been flaky since we move OMTA thread to the sampler thread (bug 1467765) on WebRender. The fis-xorig tests run on the WebRender, right? I know the flakiness reason, but I haven't figured out a good way to resolve the flakiness. The flakiness is not a problem in the wild since the flakiness is due to a test-only API (nsIDOMWindowUtils.getOMTAStyle).
Bug 1654429 Comment 9 Edit History
Note: The actual edited comment in the bug view page will always show the original commenter’s name and original timestamp.
(In reply to Boris Chiou [:boris] from comment #4) > BTW, it seems test_animation_omta.html is failed in [XOrigin sheet](https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/16G5AZhHWWow3rBgim4QBHzWXMIIJiky2SzXYgDMTTKY/edit#gid=1259287422). Not sure if it is related. test_animation_omta.html has been flaky since we moved OMTA thread to the sampler thread (bug 1467765) on WebRender. The fis-xorig tests run on the WebRender, right? I know the flakiness reason, but I haven't figured out a good way to resolve the flakiness. The flakiness is not a problem in the wild since the flakiness is due to a test-only API (nsIDOMWindowUtils.getOMTAStyle).