(In reply to Mark Banner (:standard8) from comment #8) > There may still need to be further work after that. There is further work we are doing in bug 1836962, though we may have to change approach because introducing invisible characters is proving to be complicate, we must manipulate the selection and that breaks a ton of tests and may introduce regressions. It may be possible to "simulate" the same behavior in the input field itself (we breifly discussed this with @jfkthame), but in the meanwhile we could decide to just not trim when directionality changes after trimming. Just wanted to point out that work is ongoing.
Bug 1690979 Comment 10 Edit History
Note: The actual edited comment in the bug view page will always show the original commenter’s name and original timestamp.
(In reply to Mark Banner (:standard8) from comment #8) > There may still need to be further work after that. There is further work we are doing in bug 1836962, though we may have to change approach because introducing invisible characters is proving to be complicate, we must manipulate the selection and that breaks a ton of tests and may introduce regressions. It may be possible to "simulate" the same behavior in the input field itself (we briefly discussed this with @jfkthame), but in the meanwhile we could decide to just not trim when directionality changes after trimming. Just wanted to point out that work is ongoing.