(In reply to :Gijs (he/him) from comment #1) > Drew, is this expected from the search team's perspective? Presumably disabling the button isn't a big deal in terms of code required, but I don't know what the desired/expected behaviour is here. This issue was discussed with :standard8 and it was @his suggestion that the bug to be logged as generic in terms of preferences expectancy rather than filling separate issues (there are some implications when allowing for default engine to be hidden.)
Bug 1761513 Comment 2 Edit History
Note: The actual edited comment in the bug view page will always show the original commenter’s name and original timestamp.
(In reply to :Gijs (he/him) from comment #1) > Drew, is this expected from the search team's perspective? Presumably disabling the button isn't a big deal in terms of code required, but I don't know what the desired/expected behaviour is here. This issue was discussed with :standard8 and it was @his suggestion that the bug to be logged as generic in terms of preferences expectancy rather than filling separate issues (there are some implications when allowing for the current default engine to be hidden.)