Hmmm, wearing my QA hat, I think we should continue to accept valid email addresses even if they are weird (see https://stackoverflow.com/a/38787343): This valid email addresses have both space and @ in the localpart (inside double quotes): `"UX @ its best"@thunderbird.net` `"()<>[]:,;@\\"!#$%&'-/=?^_`{}| ~.a"@example.org` Can we improve the regex here to allow such? Otherwise I'm not sure if error-prevention justifies breaking valid email addresses...
Bug 1799390 Comment 5 Edit History
Note: The actual edited comment in the bug view page will always show the original commenter’s name and original timestamp.
Hmmm, wearing my QA hat, I think we should continue to accept valid email addresses even if they are weird (see https://stackoverflow.com/a/38787343): This valid email addresses have both space and @ in the localpart (inside double quotes): `"UX @ its best"@thunderbird.net` "()<>[]:,;@\\"!#$%&'-/=?^_`{}| ~.a"@example.org Can we improve the regex here to allow such? Otherwise I'm not sure if error-prevention justifies breaking valid email addresses...
Hmmm, wearing my QA hat, I think we should continue to accept valid email addresses even if they are weird (see https://stackoverflow.com/a/38787343): This valid email addresses have both space and @ in the localpart (inside double quotes): ``` "UX @ its best"@thunderbird.net "()<>[]:,;@\\"!#$%&'-/=?^_`{}| ~.a"@example.org ``` Can we improve the regex here to allow such? Otherwise I'm not sure if error-prevention justifies breaking valid email addresses...
Hmmm, wearing my QA hat, I think we should continue to accept valid email addresses even if they are weird (see https://stackoverflow.com/a/38787343): These valid email addresses have both space and @ in the localpart (inside double quotes): ``` "UX @ its best"@thunderbird.net "()<>[]:,;@\\"!#$%&'-/=?^_`{}| ~.a"@example.org ``` Can we improve the regex here to allow such? Otherwise I'm not sure if error-prevention justifies breaking valid email addresses...