Bug 1850827 Comment 12 Edit History

Note: The actual edited comment in the bug view page will always show the original commenter’s name and original timestamp.

(In reply to Emilio Cobos Álvarez (:emilio) from comment #10)
> Is the one at the top a new thing with these patches or do you see it without them too?

- The top part is also visible in nightly, but only catches my eye when using dark mode (so the title bar color is dark) and over light background. It's easy to miss over dark background and doesn't appear to be a big deal.
- The bottom part is easily visible - but so far I could only reproducible it on https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/nightly/firstrun/ :)

Tested on two different machines - both dark-mode, one text-scale-factor 1.25 (the other 1.0). And in both cases it only happened
(In reply to Emilio Cobos Álvarez (:emilio) from comment #10)
> Is the one at the top a new thing with these patches or do you see it without them too?

- The top part is also visible in nightly, but only catches my eye when using dark mode (so the title bar color is dark) and over light background. It's easy to miss over dark background and doesn't appear to be a big deal.
- The bottom part is easily visible - but so far I could only reproduce it on https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/nightly/firstrun/ :)

Tested on two different machines - both dark-mode, one text-scale-factor 1.25 (the other 1.0). And in both cases it only happened
(In reply to Emilio Cobos Álvarez (:emilio) from comment #10)
> Is the one at the top a new thing with these patches or do you see it without them too?

- The top part is also visible in nightly, but only catches my eye when using dark mode (so the title bar color is dark) and over light background. It's easy to miss over dark background and doesn't appear to be a big deal.
- The bottom part is easily visible - but so far I could only reproduce it on https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/nightly/firstrun/ :)

Tested on two different machines - both dark-mode, one text-scale-factor 1.25 (the other 1.0).

Back to Bug 1850827 Comment 12