(In reply to Elizabeth Mitchell from comment #8) > (In reply to Richard Leger from comment #6) > We do plan to make the cards more compact. See bug 1858578. Good to know. > The cards will be smaller, but these sizes will needs to account for different font sizes people may use. Yes sure. But that does not mean the GroupBy Card shall be on three line as well... nor that I should not be able to see Message Card over two lines instead of three. > For Group by Sort, please see bug 1861853 and bug 1863403. Due to the way card scrolling is calculated, cards are all the same height, including Group by Sort headers. This is complete non-sense. See 1861853 Comment 5 for more details. > Density - What density are you using? I recommend setting your Density to Compact if you need to fit more cards on your screen. My Density is already set to Compact in the attachment I sent in Comment 6.
Bug 1861758 Comment 10 Edit History
Note: The actual edited comment in the bug view page will always show the original commenter’s name and original timestamp.
(In reply to Elizabeth Mitchell from comment #8) > (In reply to Richard Leger from comment #6) > We do plan to make the cards more compact. See bug 1858578. Good to know. > The cards will be smaller, but these sizes will needs to account for different font sizes people may use. Yes sure. But that does not mean the GroupBy Card shall be on three line as well... nor that I should not be able to see Message Card over two lines instead of three. > For Group by Sort, please see bug 1861853 and bug 1863403. Due to the way card scrolling is calculated, cards are all the same height, including Group by Sort headers. This is complete non-sense. See Bug 1861853 Comment 5 for more details. > Density - What density are you using? I recommend setting your Density to Compact if you need to fit more cards on your screen. My Density is already set to Compact in the attachment I sent in Comment 6.