(In reply to Shane Hughes [:aminomancer] from comment #1) > Let's expand on this in a tech doc. +1, please capture the feature use case and implementation direction in a tech doc thanks! [Here's an example tech doc](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1_tbbKtrQZltxZzGYmw4Y9KRp97JVJ223AlhkdBYft8o/edit#heading=h.5840t7jz7l1f) that explains using separate message group for CFR experiments which we have not been using lately and something to consider we are going into blocking message group direction
Bug 1886895 Comment 5 Edit History
Note: The actual edited comment in the bug view page will always show the original commenter’s name and original timestamp.
(In reply to Shane Hughes [:aminomancer] from comment #1) > Let's expand on this in a tech doc. +1, please capture the feature use case and implementation direction in a tech doc thanks! [Here's an example tech doc](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1_tbbKtrQZltxZzGYmw4Y9KRp97JVJ223AlhkdBYft8o/edit#heading=h.5840t7jz7l1f) that explains using separate message group for CFR experiments which we have not been using lately and something to consider as we are going into blocking message group direction