(In reply to Thomas Wolff from comment #13) > The original report is "advocating", according to its own wording, so why was my comment hidden as "advocacy". > How to handle this is obviously controversial and discussion is important. > About your patch: please don't! See my "advocacy". Because you added nothing to the discussion other than that you'd like bug 55696 to be fixed instead. That logic is flawed; not fixing this bug won't make it more likely that we'll fix bug 55696, as the last several years have shown.
Bug 672618 Comment 14 Edit History
Note: The actual edited comment in the bug view page will always show the original commenter’s name and original timestamp.
(In reply to Thomas Wolff from comment #13) > The original report is "advocating", according to its own wording, so why was my comment hidden as "advocacy". > How to handle this is obviously controversial and discussion is important. > About your patch: please don't! See my "advocacy". You added nothing to the discussion other than that you'd like bug 55696 to be fixed instead. That logic is flawed; not fixing this bug won't make it more likely that we'll fix bug 55696, as the last several years have shown.