(In reply to Raul Bucata from comment #65) > Following the OKR task requested, we have performed QA testing on related bugs mentioned in the META bug. Below are the results: Thanks, this is super thorough and handy! Request for the future: rather than using markdown with `[]()`, it'd be slightly more informative to write these comments just using bugzilla's auto-linkification of "bug nnn" (no manual linkification needed). If you do that, Bugzilla will helpfully add strikethroughs for closed bugs, and it'll also show a tooltip for the bug title/status when you hover the bug link. Whereas the bugs in comment 65 have no tooltip and no indication of whether they're currently open or closed (other than the headings that you added). Anyway, doing a quick pass over your closed-but-reproducible bugs (the most interesting /attention-worthy category in comment 65): > Investigated the following `closed` bugs: > > `reproducible:` > * [811024](https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=811024) based on [test case](https://bug811024.bmoattachments.org/attachment.cgi?id=827787) shows broken icons in Chrome, but not in Firefox This broken icons presence/absence is just a behavior difference between how Chrome and Firefox show `img` elements with no `src` attribute (not a bug, not related to flex fragmentation). Reduced testcase for that is `data:text/html,<img src="" style="border:1px solid black;height:100px;width:100px">`and it's not worrisome. > * [1843228](https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1843228) based on [test case](https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=9343642) reproduces, as the layout is not the same (no overlapping elements though) At first glance, this "layout is not the same" thing is just due to font differences or similar, which cause the amount-of-content-that-fits-in-a-column to be different. > * [1089549](https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1089549) based on [test case](https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=8511950) reproduces Can you elaborate on what reproduces here? When I print-preview the testcase attached there (the one that you linked), I see all 68 rows. Nothing is truncated. (The only issue I see is that some borders are missing between rows -- not sure if that's the issue you were seeing, but that's bug 1775345 (which is a duped to an older more-general bug). > * [1807406]( https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1807406)based on [test case](https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=9309765) seems somehow reproducible Can you elaborate on what you mean by "somehow reproducible" here? As above, I don't see any issue aside from the missing borders (which is bug 1775345) > * [1315994](https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1315994) based [test case](https://bug1315994.bmoattachments.org/attachment.cgi?id=8808665) reproduces (missing elements in print-preview) Can you elaborate? The "test case" that you linked here is not actually a testcase; it's a PDF printout that the reporter attached when filing the bug, showing how Firefox at-the-time printed the site. The real testcase for that bug is https://getbootstrap.com/docs/4.0/layout/grid/ and it seems to have changed since the bug was filed (the content is different from what's shown in that PDF); but in any case I'm not seeing any issues when I print-preview it in current Nightly.
Bug 939897 Comment 66 Edit History
Note: The actual edited comment in the bug view page will always show the original commenter’s name and original timestamp.
(In reply to Raul Bucata from comment #65) > Following the OKR task requested, we have performed QA testing on related bugs mentioned in the META bug. Below are the results: Thanks, this is super thorough and handy! Request for the future: rather than using markdown with `[]()`, it'd be slightly more informative to write these comments just using bugzilla's auto-linkification of "bug nnn" (no manual linkification needed). If you do that, Bugzilla will helpfully add strikethroughs for closed bugs, and it'll also show a tooltip for the bug title/status when you hover the bug link. Whereas the bugs in comment 65 have no tooltip and no indication of whether they're currently open or closed (other than the headings that you added). Anyway, doing a quick pass over your closed-but-reproducible bugs (the most interesting /attention-worthy category in comment 65): > Investigated the following `closed` bugs: > > `reproducible:` > * [811024](https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=811024) based on [test case](https://bug811024.bmoattachments.org/attachment.cgi?id=827787) shows broken icons in Chrome, but not in Firefox [not worried] This broken icons presence/absence is just a behavior difference between how Chrome and Firefox show `img` elements with no `src` attribute (not a bug, not related to flex fragmentation). Reduced testcase for that is `data:text/html,<img src="" style="border:1px solid black;height:100px;width:100px">`and it's not worrisome. > * [1843228](https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1843228) based on [test case](https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=9343642) reproduces, as the layout is not the same (no overlapping elements though) [not worried] At first glance, this "layout is not the same" thing is just due to font differences or similar, which cause the amount-of-content-that-fits-in-a-column to be different. > * [1089549](https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1089549) based on [test case](https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=8511950) reproduces Can you elaborate on what reproduces here? When I print-preview the testcase attached there (the one that you linked), I see all 68 rows. Nothing is truncated. (The only issue I see is that some borders are missing between rows -- not sure if that's the issue you were seeing, but that's bug 1775345 (which is a duped to an older more-general bug). > * [1807406]( https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1807406)based on [test case](https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=9309765) seems somehow reproducible Can you elaborate on what you mean by "somehow reproducible" here? As above, I don't see any issue aside from the missing borders (which is bug 1775345) > * [1315994](https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1315994) based [test case](https://bug1315994.bmoattachments.org/attachment.cgi?id=8808665) reproduces (missing elements in print-preview) Can you elaborate? The "test case" that you linked here is not actually a testcase; it's a PDF printout that the reporter attached when filing the bug, showing how Firefox at-the-time printed the site. The real testcase for that bug is https://getbootstrap.com/docs/4.0/layout/grid/ and it seems to have changed since the bug was filed (the content is different from what's shown in that PDF); but in any case I'm not seeing any issues when I print-preview it in current Nightly.
(In reply to Raul Bucata from comment #65) > Following the OKR task requested, we have performed QA testing on related bugs mentioned in the META bug. Below are the results: Thanks, this is super thorough and handy! Request for the future: rather than using markdown with `[]()`, it'd be slightly more informative to write these comments just using bugzilla's auto-linkification of "bug nnn" (no manual linkification needed). If you do that, Bugzilla will helpfully add strikethroughs for closed bugs, and it'll also show a tooltip for the bug title/status when you hover the bug link. Whereas the bugs in comment 65 have no tooltip and no indication of whether they're currently open or closed (other than the headings that you added). Anyway, doing a quick pass over your closed-but-reproducible bugs (the most interesting /attention-worthy category in comment 65): > Investigated the following `closed` bugs: > > `reproducible:` > * [811024](https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=811024) based on [test case](https://bug811024.bmoattachments.org/attachment.cgi?id=827787) shows broken icons in Chrome, but not in Firefox [not worried] This broken icons presence/absence is just a behavior difference between how Chrome and Firefox show `img` elements with no `src` attribute (not a bug, not related to flex fragmentation). Reduced testcase for that is `data:text/html,<img src="" style="border:1px solid black;height:100px;width:100px">`and it's not worrisome. > * [1843228](https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1843228) based on [test case](https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=9343642) reproduces, as the layout is not the same (no overlapping elements though) [not worried] At first glance, this "layout is not the same" thing is just due to font differences or similar, which cause the amount-of-content-that-fits-in-a-column to be different. > * [1089549](https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1089549) based on [test case](https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=8511950) reproduces Can you elaborate on what reproduces here? When I print-preview the testcase attached there (the one that you linked), I see all 68 rows. The printout is not truncated or obviously broken. (The only issue I see is that some borders are missing between rows -- not sure if that's the issue you were seeing, but that's bug 1775345 (which is a duped to an older more-general bug). > * [1807406]( https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1807406)based on [test case](https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=9309765) seems somehow reproducible Can you elaborate on what you mean by "somehow reproducible" here? As above, I don't see any issue aside from the missing borders (which is bug 1775345) > * [1315994](https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1315994) based [test case](https://bug1315994.bmoattachments.org/attachment.cgi?id=8808665) reproduces (missing elements in print-preview) Can you elaborate? The "test case" that you linked here is not actually a testcase; it's a PDF printout that the reporter attached when filing the bug, showing how Firefox at-the-time printed the site. The real testcase for that bug is https://getbootstrap.com/docs/4.0/layout/grid/ and it seems to have changed since the bug was filed (the content is different from what's shown in that PDF); but in any case I'm not seeing any issues when I print-preview it in current Nightly.