Bug 978570 Comment 9 Edit History

Note: The actual edited comment in the bug view page will always show the original commenter’s name and original timestamp.

(In reply to Kai Engert (:KaiE:) from comment #3)
> It has been suggest to enable this by default for TB Beta, can we do this immediately? If yes, who could handle it?

I haven't seen any discussion or information on what has been tested.  And what are the plans/time line surrounding enabling this.  Can you add both of these to the bug report please?

Some points/questions:
1. What do we know about the size of the daily users who use calendar, and how that testing has gone?
2. Have we solicited beta users to test prior enabling it by default for all beta users?  (I'm sure we have users who would be willing to test)
3. Almost no icaljs bug reports have been fixed in the past year.  And almost not [open bug reports](https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?product=Calendar&product=MailNews%20Core&product=Thunderbird&f3=OP&o6=anywords&v6=890565%20978571%201149470%201212914%201266797%201411530%201643701%201659582%201732710%201754412%201754413%20&f2=component&f6=bug_id&o2=nowordssubstr&f7=CP&v5=icaljs%20ical.js&o5=anywordssubstr&f5=short_desc&j3=OR&list_id=15988237&f4=component&o4=substring&v4=ical.js&resolution=---&query_format=advanced&classification=Client%20Software&classification=Developer%20Infrastructure&classification=Components&classification=Server%20Software&classification=Other&f1=short_desc&o1=nowordssubstr), have been touched in the past year, including bugs which are marked as blockers to this bug report.  
4. Are there potential blocker issues at https://github.com/libical/libical/issues?
5. Do we have calendar developer(s) who are committed to **immediately** fixing regressions reported by beta users? 
6. Why would we enable this for beta before doing Bug 1754417 - upgrade to ical.js 1.5.0?
(In reply to Kai Engert (:KaiE:) from comment #3)
> It has been suggest to enable this by default for TB Beta, can we do this immediately? If yes, who could handle it?

I haven't seen any discussion or information on what has been tested.  And what are the plans/time line surrounding enabling this.  Can you add both of these to the bug report please?

Some points/questions:
1. What do we know about the size of the daily users who use calendar, and how that testing has gone?
2. Have we solicited beta users to test prior enabling it by default for all beta users?  (I'm sure we have users who would be willing to test)
3. Almost no icaljs bug reports have been fixed in the past year.  And almost no [open bug reports](https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?product=Calendar&product=MailNews%20Core&product=Thunderbird&f3=OP&o6=anywords&v6=890565%20978571%201149470%201212914%201266797%201411530%201643701%201659582%201732710%201754412%201754413%20&f2=component&f6=bug_id&o2=nowordssubstr&f7=CP&v5=icaljs%20ical.js&o5=anywordssubstr&f5=short_desc&j3=OR&list_id=15988237&f4=component&o4=substring&v4=ical.js&resolution=---&query_format=advanced&classification=Client%20Software&classification=Developer%20Infrastructure&classification=Components&classification=Server%20Software&classification=Other&f1=short_desc&o1=nowordssubstr) have been touched in the past year, including bugs which are marked as blockers to this bug report.  
4. Are there potential blocker issues at https://github.com/libical/libical/issues?
5. Do we have calendar developer(s) who are committed to **immediately** fixing regressions reported by beta users? 
6. Why would we enable this for beta before doing Bug 1754417 - upgrade to ical.js 1.5.0?

Back to Bug 978570 Comment 9