Closed
Bug 1008610
Opened 10 years ago
Closed 10 years ago
White border around button
Categories
(Core :: Graphics, defect)
Tracking
()
People
(Reporter: evilpie, Assigned: mattwoodrow)
References
Details
(Keywords: regression, Whiteboard: [bugday-20140514])
Attachments
(2 files)
44.47 KB,
image/png
|
Details | |
1.22 KB,
patch
|
bas.schouten
:
review+
Sylvestre
:
approval-mozilla-aurora+
Sylvestre
:
approval-mozilla-beta+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
Latest Firefox Nightly on Linux Mint.
Reporter | ||
Comment 2•10 years ago
|
||
Last good revision: 2a03b34c8953 (2014-05-08)
First bad revision: cf89b5d018f8 (2014-05-09)
Pushlog:
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/pushloghtml?fromchange=2a03b34c8953&tochange=cf89b5d018f8
I tried bisecting revisions with mozregression, but that doesn't seem to work.
Flags: needinfo?(evilpies)
This affects the "allow" button for extension installation and firebug2s toolbar button too
Last good revision: 5bbc85136202
First bad revision: d1155f994a3a
Pushlog:
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/pushloghtml?fromchange=5bbc85136202&tochange=d1155f994a3a
Comment 4•10 years ago
|
||
These regression ranges overlap, but one isn't a subset of the other.
That's very confusing. :-(
Updated•10 years ago
|
Flags: needinfo?(gijskruitbosch+bugs)
Just to be clear mozregression marks those as a subset from inside of 08/05 - 09/05. I don't have a tree at work so can't do a build test until i get home.
Comment 6•10 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Cork from comment #5)
> Just to be clear mozregression marks those as a subset from inside of 08/05
> - 09/05. I don't have a tree at work so can't do a build test until i get
> home.
Huh, interesting. d1155f994a3a is in the range, but 5bbc85136202 is not. I guess it's because of merging, so I suspect (but am not 100% sure) that the real range is the intersection of the two, which is quite small:
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/pushloghtml?fromchange=8a5a9a06f59a&tochange=d1155f994a3a
Reporter | ||
Comment 7•10 years ago
|
||
Maybe this has something to do with Bug 1003707? I could imagine if for some reason we calculate a little bit to large element size and thus end up with a white background.
The first bad revision is:
changeset: 182069:3b5fb4abaa3f
user: Matt Woodrow <mwoodrow@mozilla.com>
date: Thu May 08 11:23:44 2014 +1200
summary: Bug 1003707 - Pass surfaces sizes in to CreateSourceSurfaceFromNativeSurface instead of trying to extract it from cairo. r=Bas
Blocks: 1003707
Updated•10 years ago
|
Flags: needinfo?(gijskruitbosch+bugs)
Reporter | ||
Updated•10 years ago
|
Flags: needinfo?(matt.woodrow)
Comment 9•10 years ago
|
||
Why bug 1003707 was landed on m-c and m-a at all? Firefox 31+ had no problem.
Assignee | ||
Comment 10•10 years ago
|
||
Assignee: nobody → matt.woodrow
Attachment #8421441 -
Flags: review?(bas)
Flags: needinfo?(matt.woodrow)
Assignee | ||
Comment 11•10 years ago
|
||
We should track this since we're uplifting bug 1003707.
status-firefox30:
--- → affected
status-firefox31:
--- → affected
status-firefox32:
--- → affected
tracking-firefox30:
--- → ?
tracking-firefox31:
--- → ?
Updated•10 years ago
|
Attachment #8421441 -
Flags: review?(bas) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 12•10 years ago
|
||
Comment 13•10 years ago
|
||
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 10 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → Firefox 32
Updated•10 years ago
|
Assignee | ||
Comment 15•10 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8421441 [details] [diff] [review]
Fix copy-paste error
[Approval Request Comment]
Bug caused by (feature/regressing bug #): Bug 1003707
User impact if declined: Broken native theme rendering on linux
Testing completed (on m-c, etc.): Been on m-c, manually tested
Risk to taking this patch (and alternatives if risky): Very low risk, just fixes a typo.
String or IDL/UUID changes made by this patch: None.
Attachment #8421441 -
Flags: approval-mozilla-beta?
Attachment #8421441 -
Flags: approval-mozilla-aurora?
Flags: needinfo?(matt.woodrow)
Updated•10 years ago
|
Attachment #8421441 -
Flags: approval-mozilla-beta?
Attachment #8421441 -
Flags: approval-mozilla-beta+
Attachment #8421441 -
Flags: approval-mozilla-aurora?
Attachment #8421441 -
Flags: approval-mozilla-aurora+
Comment 16•10 years ago
|
||
Comment 17•10 years ago
|
||
Hi,
I was able to reproduce it on Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:32.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/32.0 ID:20140510030204 CSet: 7586c29906b5
I can confirm that the issue is no longer present in the latest Nightly Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:32.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/32.0 ID:20140514030203 CSet: 2f8af55d6e9a
Cheers,
Francesca
Whiteboard: [bugday-20140514]
Comment 18•10 years ago
|
||
And now verified on latest Aurora and latest Beta as well.
Cheers,
Francesca
Updated•10 years ago
|
Component: General → Graphics
Product: Firefox → Core
Target Milestone: Firefox 32 → ---
Comment 19•10 years ago
|
||
Updated•10 years ago
|
status-b2g-v1.4:
--- → fixed
status-b2g-v2.0:
--- → fixed
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•