Closed
Bug 1008626
Opened 10 years ago
Closed 10 years ago
Remove unneeded capabilities that are returned from the browser
Categories
(Remote Protocol :: Marionette, defect)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
FIXED
mozilla32
People
(Reporter: automatedtester, Assigned: shashank)
Details
(Keywords: pi-marionette-server, pi-marionette-spec, Whiteboard: [good first bug][lang= js][mentor=automatedtester])
Attachments
(1 file, 1 obsolete file)
We no longer need javaScriptEnabled and cssSelectors capabilities so these can be removed from what is returned. The following lines will need to be deleted. http://dxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/testing/marionette/marionette-server.js#562 http://dxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/testing/marionette/marionette-server.js#564
Reporter | ||
Updated•10 years ago
|
Keywords: ateam-marionette-server,
ateam-marionette-spec
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•10 years ago
|
||
Removed no longer need javaScriptEnabled and cssSelectors capabili\ ties that are returned from the browser r=automatedtester
Attachment #8427291 -
Flags: review?(dburns)
Reporter | ||
Updated•10 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → shashank16392
Reporter | ||
Comment 2•10 years ago
|
||
Try https://tbpl.mozilla.org/?tree=Try&rev=34104f0215ab https://tbpl.mozilla.org/?tree=Try&rev=9f8c715ac10d
Flags: needinfo?(dburns)
Reporter | ||
Comment 3•10 years ago
|
||
Thanks for the patch, I will be running it through try to make sure that it works without breaking one of the dependencies. Once this looks good I will be pushing it into the tree Thanks again!
Flags: needinfo?(dburns)
Reporter | ||
Updated•10 years ago
|
Flags: needinfo?(dburns)
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•10 years ago
|
||
Thanks for accepting. * Is it necessary that I put a 'needinfo' in spite of a 'review?' ? * Do reviewers give a 'review+' only after the tbpl tests complete but not any before? Thanks, Shashank
Reporter | ||
Comment 5•10 years ago
|
||
I have a search for needinfo for me which I look at before my review queue :) In this case it doesnt matter when I do r+ but would like to see if there are test suites that fail before I review it
Reporter | ||
Comment 6•10 years ago
|
||
Helps if I push the patch to try... https://tbpl.mozilla.org/?tree=Try&rev=684ec9e45609 https://tbpl.mozilla.org/?tree=Try&rev=82eee84f69d1
Reporter | ||
Comment 7•10 years ago
|
||
Shashank, There are failures related to this change, if you click on the links in comment 6 it will take you to the test results. Could you update the tests accordingly
Flags: needinfo?(dburns)
Assignee | ||
Comment 8•10 years ago
|
||
(In reply to David Burns :automatedtester from comment #7) > Shashank, > > There are failures related to this change, if you click on the links in > comment 6 it will take you to the test results. Could you update the tests > accordingly David Burns, I don't understand what you mean by 'update tests accordingly'
Flags: needinfo?(dburns)
Reporter | ||
Comment 9•10 years ago
|
||
Could you update the tests to no longer have the items that you removed from your patch
Flags: needinfo?(dburns)
Assignee | ||
Comment 10•10 years ago
|
||
Tests updated
Attachment #8427291 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8427291 -
Flags: review?(dburns)
Attachment #8431267 -
Flags: review?(dburns)
Flags: needinfo?(dburns)
Reporter | ||
Comment 11•10 years ago
|
||
https://tbpl.mozilla.org/?tree=Try&rev=ac5a55d19ab5 https://tbpl.mozilla.org/?tree=Try&rev=2b9197044ad2
Flags: needinfo?(dburns)
Reporter | ||
Comment 12•10 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8431267 [details] [diff] [review] BUG 1008626 - Removed javaScriptEnabled and cssSelectors capabilities (no longer needed); updated tests accordingly r=automatedtester Review of attachment 8431267 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- This is brilliant! Thanks for doing this!.
Attachment #8431267 -
Flags: review?(dburns) → review+
Reporter | ||
Updated•10 years ago
|
Keywords: checkin-needed
Reporter | ||
Comment 13•10 years ago
|
||
The next step is to have one of the sheriffs land this on inbound and if it sticks, which it should, then it will be merged into Mozilla-Central and be in the next nightly after that. Please feel free to look for more bugs in this area! For marionette ones we have https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=runnamed&namedcmd=marionette-gfb&list_id=10375099 to help get you started
Assignee | ||
Comment 14•10 years ago
|
||
Dear MR David Burns, I thank you for your encouragement and support through. Your suggestions led me to learn 'Marionette Testing'. The above link is broken. Could you please resubmit? Thanks, Shashank
Comment 15•10 years ago
|
||
(In reply to David Burns :automatedtester from comment #13) > The next step is to have one of the sheriffs land this on inbound and if it > sticks, which it should, then it will be merged into Mozilla-Central and be > in the next nightly after that. > > Please feel free to look for more bugs in this area! For marionette ones we > have > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist. > cgi?cmdtype=runnamed&namedcmd=marionette-gfb&list_id=10375099 to help get > you started The shared query link is: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=dorem&remaction=run&namedcmd=marionette-gfb&sharer_id=397261 dkl
Comment 16•10 years ago
|
||
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/e20435fd8c3e
Keywords: checkin-needed
Comment 17•10 years ago
|
||
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/e20435fd8c3e
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 10 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla32
Updated•1 year ago
|
Product: Testing → Remote Protocol
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•