Closed
Bug 1015839
Opened 12 years ago
Closed 12 years ago
Swisscom Audit Statements
Categories
(CA Program :: CA Documents, task)
CA Program
CA Documents
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
WORKSFORME
People
(Reporter: patrick.graber, Assigned: kathleen.a.wilson)
Details
(Whiteboard: [ca-audits])
Attachments
(10 files, 3 obsolete files)
|
111.87 KB,
application/pdf
|
Details | |
|
438.73 KB,
application/pdf
|
Details | |
|
85.10 KB,
application/pdf
|
Details | |
|
48.07 KB,
application/pdf
|
Details | |
|
364.19 KB,
application/.pdf
|
Details | |
|
366.18 KB,
application/pdf
|
Details | |
|
607.32 KB,
application/pdf
|
Details | |
|
1.03 MB,
application/pdf
|
Details | |
|
1.06 MB,
application/pdf
|
Details | |
|
440.00 KB,
application/pdf
|
Details |
User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 9.0; Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; Trident/5.0; SLCC2; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; Media Center PC 6.0; .NET4.0C; .NET4.0E; InfoPath.3)
Steps to reproduce:
EV Audit 2013 required by "Mozilla Communication: Action requested by May 30, 2014"
| Assignee | ||
Comment 1•12 years ago
|
||
Patrick,
Please see item #11 of
http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/about/governance/policies/security-group/certs/policy/inclusion/
ETSI TS 101 456 is OK for non-SSL cert issuance, but the 3 Swisscom roots that are included have the websites (SSL) trust bit enabled. So they need an audit statement according to the following criteria:
- Clause 7, "Requirements on CA practice", in ETSI TS 102 042 V2.3.1 or later version, Policy requirements for certification authorities issuing public key certificates (as applicable to the "EVCP" and "EVCP+" certificate policies, DVCP and OVCP certificate policies for publicly trusted certificates - baseline requirements, and any of the "NCP", "NCP+", or "LCP" certificate policies);
OR
- WebTrust "Principles and Criteria for Certification Authorities 2.0" or later and "SSL Baseline Requirements Audit Criteria V1.1" (as applicable to SSL certificate issuance) in WebTrust Program for Certification Authorities;
And (additional) for the EV root:
- WebTrust "Principles and Criteria for Certification Authorities - Extended Validation Audit Criteria 1.4" or later in WebTrust Program for Certification Authorities.
Also, please see item #12 of
http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/about/governance/policies/security-group/certs/policy/inclusion/
Which requires an audit according to the CA/Browser Forum's Baseline Requirements (https://cabforum.org/baseline-requirements-documents/) for roots that have the websites trust bit enabled.
https://wiki.mozilla.org/CA:CertificatePolicyV2.1#Audit_Criteria
The audit statements must clearly indicate which criteria (and version of the criteria) was used in the audit, and which roots and intermediate certificates were evaluated during the audit.
Status: UNCONFIRMED → ASSIGNED
Ever confirmed: true
Whiteboard: Need Audits - ETSI 102042 or WebTrust CA, and EV, and BR
| Reporter | ||
Comment 2•12 years ago
|
||
Please find the required audit statement.
Attachment #8428543 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
| Assignee | ||
Comment 3•12 years ago
|
||
Closing this bug, but this bug will continue to be used for tracking Swisscom's current ETSI TS 102 042 audit statements.
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 12 years ago
Resolution: --- → WORKSFORME
Whiteboard: Need Audits - ETSI 102042 or WebTrust CA, and EV, and BR → Audit Statements: ETSI 102042, BR, and EV
| Assignee | ||
Comment 4•11 years ago
|
||
| Assignee | ||
Comment 5•11 years ago
|
||
| Assignee | ||
Comment 6•11 years ago
|
||
| Assignee | ||
Comment 7•10 years ago
|
||
| Assignee | ||
Comment 8•10 years ago
|
||
New version of the audit statement explicitly mentioning which root certificates were covered in the audit.
| Assignee | ||
Comment 9•10 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Kathleen Wilson from comment #8)
> Created attachment 8781165 [details]
> 2016-08-15-Swisscom-EV-SSL-Certification-Confirmation.pdf
>
> New version of the audit statement explicitly mentioning which root
> certificates were covered in the audit.
I have exchanged email with the auditor to confirm the authenticity of this audit statement.
| Assignee | ||
Updated•9 years ago
|
Whiteboard: Audit Statements: ETSI 102042, BR, and EV → [ca-audits] Audit Statements: ETSI 102042, BR, and EV
Updated•9 years ago
|
Product: mozilla.org → NSS
Comment 10•9 years ago
|
||
Comment 11•9 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8908071 [details]
2017 Swisscom Root CA Audit confirmation eIDAS
I added also a signed copy, check attachment "2017 Swisscom Root CA Audit confirmation eIDAS (signed)"
Comment 12•9 years ago
|
||
Confirmation of the 2017 ETSI audit for Root CA 2 and the EU Saphir and EU Diamant CAs.
| Assignee | ||
Updated•9 years ago
|
Summary: Swisscom EV CA 2, Audit Statement 2013 → Swisscom Audit Statements
| Assignee | ||
Updated•9 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [ca-audits] Audit Statements: ETSI 102042, BR, and EV → [ca-audits]
Comment 13•8 years ago
|
||
Comment 14•8 years ago
|
||
CP/CPS Diamant and Saphir 3.2 English.pdf
Comment 15•8 years ago
|
||
CP/CPS Smaragd and Rubin v3.1 English
Updated•8 years ago
|
Attachment #8985888 -
Attachment description: CP/CPS Diamant and Saphir 3.2 English.pdf → CP/CPS Diamant and Saphir 3.2 English
Comment 16•7 years ago
|
||
Swisscom Root CA 2, Swisscom Diamant EU CA 4 and Swisscom Saphir EU CA 4 Audit Attestation by KPMG for Swisscom IT Service Finance S.E. ATU64741248
Attachment #8908071 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8920026 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Updated•3 years ago
|
Product: NSS → CA Program
Updated•3 years ago
|
Component: CA Certificate Root Program → CA Documents
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•