Closed
Bug 1018264
Opened 11 years ago
Closed 11 years ago
Properly recognize B2G non-unified builds on TBPL
Categories
(Tree Management Graveyard :: TBPL, defect)
Tree Management Graveyard
TBPL
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: RyanVM, Assigned: RyanVM)
References
Details
Attachments
(1 file)
|
3.86 KB,
patch
|
emorley
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
They're showing up as ? at the moment.
|
Assignee | |
Comment 1•11 years ago
|
||
I also tweaked the generic non-unified fallback to catch "nonunified" as well, so we at least won't get "?" builds next time around.
Attachment #8431637 -
Flags: review?(emorley)
|
||
Comment 2•11 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8431637 [details] [diff] [review]
patch
Review of attachment 8431637 [details] [diff] [review]:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
r=me with [-]? instead of (-)?
(Seeing as single char & so makes a bit more sense to use a character set - and iirc slightly better perf)
Attachment #8431637 -
Flags: review?(emorley) → review+
|
|
Assignee | |
Comment 3•11 years ago
|
||
|
|
Assignee | |
Comment 4•11 years ago
|
||
In production.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 11 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
|
||
Updated•11 years ago
|
Product: Webtools → Tree Management
|
|
||
Updated•11 years ago
|
Product: Tree Management → Tree Management Graveyard
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•