Closed Bug 1018561 Opened 6 years ago Closed 5 years ago
.2% linux32 dromaeo css regression on inbound (fx32) May 30
We have a slight regression in dromaeo dom: http://graphs.mozilla.org/graph.html#tests=[[72,131,33]]&sel=none&displayrange=7&datatype=running I did some retriggers to help verify the exact changeset: https://tbpl.mozilla.org/?tree=Mozilla-Inbound&fromchange=db25dbf0e8d0&tochange=e09be54f43d6&jobname=Ubuntu%20HW%2012.04%20mozilla-inbound%20talos%20dromaeojs While this is a slight regression the patches from bug 957086 show a clear drop in the numbers (lower is worse) as prior to this the retriggers show a 4800-4900 range and for this changeset we dip into the 4700 range for most of the values.
I really don't see why bug 957086 would have affected Dromaeo scores unless it's a PGO artifact. But do we actually do PGO on this platform?
the test is regression on non pgo, we do pgo and it appears we have regressed there as well: http://graphs.mozilla.org/graph.html#tests=[[72,131,33],[72,63,33]]&sel=1401107828173,1401712628173&displayrange=7&datatype=running
on aurora we seem to have an overall win (higher is better): http://graphs.mozilla.org/graph.html#tests=[[72,63,33],[72,131,33],[72,52,33]]&sel=1397236726302,1405012726302&displayrange=90&datatype=running so I will unblock this from firefox 32.
No longer blocks: 1004427
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 5 years ago
Resolution: --- → WONTFIX
Component: DOM → DOM: Core & HTML
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.