Closed
Bug 1023863
Opened 11 years ago
Closed 11 years ago
The divider spacing is too tall
Categories
(Firefox OS Graveyard :: Gaia::Homescreen, defect)
Tracking
(b2g-v2.0 fixed, b2g-v2.1 fixed)
RESOLVED
FIXED
2.0 S5 (4july)
People
(Reporter: padamczyk, Assigned: sfoster)
References
Details
(Whiteboard: ux-tracking, visual design, visual-tracking, [ft:systemsfe][systemsfe])
Attachments
(11 files, 12 obsolete files)
714.80 KB,
image/png
|
Details | |
728.66 KB,
image/png
|
Details | |
194.99 KB,
image/png
|
Details | |
46 bytes,
text/x-github-pull-request
|
kgrandon
:
review+
bajaj
:
approval-gaia-v2.0+
|
Details | Review |
1.00 MB,
image/png
|
Details | |
167.44 KB,
image/png
|
Details | |
1004.45 KB,
image/png
|
Details | |
1.02 MB,
image/png
|
Details | |
394.06 KB,
image/jpeg
|
Details | |
225.59 KB,
image/png
|
padamczyk
:
ui-review+
|
Details |
212.07 KB,
image/png
|
padamczyk
:
ui-review+
|
Details |
The spacing between the icons is too tall... It feels slightly too tall on the 3 column grid, but far too tall on the 4 column grid.
Reporter | ||
Updated•11 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → pla
Blocks: vertical-homescreen
Reporter | ||
Comment 1•11 years ago
|
||
Peter can you please check the specing, this doesn't feel right at all.
Flags: needinfo?(pla)
Flags: needinfo?(pla)
Whiteboard: ux-tracking, visual design, visual-tracking, [ft:systemsfe][systemsfe]
Kevin,
This keeps the horizontal layout exactly as you have it on master. The changes are with the vertical spacing. Please contact me when you're ready to work on this, so I can help you make sense of it in terms that are more appropriate to the implementation (as we discussed last week).
Kevin,
This is exactly the same as the one for Flame, except all the numbers have been divided by a scale factor of 1.5.
Comment 6•11 years ago
|
||
Right, we will look into fixing this. Going to ni? on Cristian and Sam to see if either would be interested in picking up this UI work. Thanks!
Flags: needinfo?(sfoster)
Flags: needinfo?(kgrandon)
Flags: needinfo?(crdlc)
Assignee | ||
Comment 7•11 years ago
|
||
Yeah I'll take this.
Flags: needinfo?(sfoster)
Flags: needinfo?(crdlc)
QA Contact: sfoster
Assignee | ||
Updated•11 years ago
|
Assignee: pla → sfoster
QA Contact: sfoster
Target Milestone: --- → 2.0 S5 (4july)
Assignee | ||
Comment 8•11 years ago
|
||
Screenshot from flame, 3-col homescreen, with adjusted divider margins/pixelHeight
Assignee | ||
Comment 9•11 years ago
|
||
Screenshot from flame, 4-col homescreen, with adjusted divider margins/pixelHeight. How does this look Peter?
Flags: needinfo?(pla)
Assignee | ||
Comment 10•11 years ago
|
||
Does this look alright code-wise? See attached screenshots for preview of result
Attachment #8446242 -
Flags: review?(kgrandon)
Comment 11•11 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8446242 [details] [review]
PR with changes to divider style and grid item pixelHeight
The four column looks a little strange to me, divider seems a bit low. Code generally looks fine, but clearing review for now until Peter chimes in.
Attachment #8446242 -
Flags: review?(kgrandon)
Comment 12•11 years ago
|
||
Hi Sam,
This is a good start. My apologies, first of all, as I found a couple of mistakes in the spec that I posted. I've created a small spec with these corrected, as well as outlining the differences between your screenshot and what it should be. Please have a look and let me know if it makes sense. I've tried to call certain things out more explicitly.
Note, I will be updating the full spec with this clearer format as well. Stay tuned.
Flags: needinfo?(pla)
Comment 13•11 years ago
|
||
Attachment #8444608 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Comment 14•11 years ago
|
||
I've added a note in here about scaling to other resolutions.
I'm going to obsolete and stop supporting the HVGA (320x480) spec as it is simply dividing everything by 1.5, and is redundant, and creates more work.
Attachment #8444610 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8446658 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Assignee | ||
Comment 15•11 years ago
|
||
I've plugged in the new numbers for 3-cols and heres how it looks
Flags: needinfo?(pla)
Assignee | ||
Comment 16•11 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Sam Foster [:sfoster] from comment #15)
> Created attachment 8447359 [details]
> 3 column, highlighting divider and icon height
>
> I've plugged in the new numbers for 3-cols and heres how it looks
Hold that thought, I've got my 4 and 3 col dimensions mixed up. I'll update shortly.
Flags: needinfo?(pla)
Comment 17•11 years ago
|
||
Attachment #8446723 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Assignee | ||
Comment 18•11 years ago
|
||
Updated to latest spec, with 10rem item height, 5rem divider total height
Attachment #8446236 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8447425 -
Flags: ui-review?(pla)
Assignee | ||
Comment 19•11 years ago
|
||
Updated to latest spec, with item height at 10rem, divider height 5rem
Assignee | ||
Comment 20•11 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Sam Foster [:sfoster] from comment #18)
> Created attachment 8447425 [details]
> home-dividers-3col-flame.png
>
> Updated to latest spec, with 10rem item height, 5rem divider total height
Ack, not helping! I mean 12rem item height, 6rem divider total height for the 3-columns case
Assignee | ||
Comment 21•11 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8446242 [details] [review]
PR with changes to divider style and grid item pixelHeight
See notes in GH, slight update on various values per latest spec. Same approach.
Attachment #8446242 -
Flags: review?(kgrandon)
Assignee | ||
Comment 22•11 years ago
|
||
from IRC: 15:25 <peterla> .. Ive come up with a rule that would make the 3 column and 4 column more consistent
15:25 <peterla> the 3 column divider area is 6 rem total height
15:26 <peterla> if we just put the top of the divider 1/3 of the way down
15:26 <peterla> that would mean 2, 0.2, 3.8 for a total of 6 rem
15:26 <peterla> for 4 column
15:26 <peterla> if you could do
15:26 <peterla> 1.6, 0.2, 3.2 for a total of 5 rem
15:27 <peterla> that would make them both feel about the same
15:28 <peterla> (it’s actually 1.667, 0.2, 3.133, but i rounded it)
For 3 cols, these are the exact values I was using already. I've updated the 4 col margin values and updated the screenshot. It looks pretty bang on middle to me...
Attachment #8447426 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Assignee | ||
Updated•11 years ago
|
Attachment #8447524 -
Flags: ui-review?(pla)
Comment 23•11 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8446242 [details] [review]
PR with changes to divider style and grid item pixelHeight
Looks fine to me, thanks!
Attachment #8446242 -
Flags: review?(kgrandon) → review+
Comment 24•11 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8447524 [details]
home-dividers-4col-flame.png
This lines up perfectly with the spec! Nice job!
Attachment #8447524 -
Flags: ui-review?(pla) → ui-review+
Comment 25•11 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8447425 [details]
home-dividers-3col-flame.png
Hey Sam,
This is really close but the divider is about 0.3 rem too high, and the app labels are also 0.3 rem too low.
See attachment after this comment for comparison.
You're really close!
Attachment #8447425 -
Flags: ui-review?(pla) → ui-review-
Comment 26•11 years ago
|
||
See this screenshot for feedback on 3-column layout. It's really close.
Comment 27•11 years ago
|
||
Oops. Accidentally attached photoshop file instead of png.
Attachment #8448303 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Assignee | ||
Comment 28•11 years ago
|
||
Screenshot of 3-column homescreen. I've got this lined up against the spec and it seems pixel-perfect to me?
Attachment #8448869 -
Flags: ui-review?(padamczyk)
Assignee | ||
Comment 29•11 years ago
|
||
Screenshot of 4-column homescreen from Flame. I've lined this up against the spec and it seems pixel-perfect to me?
Attachment #8447425 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8447524 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8448872 -
Flags: ui-review?(padamczyk)
Comment 30•11 years ago
|
||
I think it would be nicer if there was a little bit more spacing underneath the search bar and a little less around the divider, so that they matched. It feels that the space around the first row of icons on the top and bottom should be symmetric.
Updated•11 years ago
|
Whiteboard: ux-tracking, visual design, visual-tracking, [ft:systemsfe][systemsfe] → ux-tracking, visual design, visual-tracking, [ft:systemsfe][systemsfe][2.0-VH-bug-bash]
Updated•11 years ago
|
Whiteboard: ux-tracking, visual design, visual-tracking, [ft:systemsfe][systemsfe][2.0-VH-bug-bash] → ux-tracking, visual design, visual-tracking, [ft:systemsfe][systemsfe]
Reporter | ||
Comment 31•11 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8448872 [details]
home-dividers-4col-flame.png (updated 07/01)
Thanks Sam, this matches Peter spec!
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=8448304
Attachment #8448872 -
Flags: ui-review?(padamczyk) → ui-review+
Reporter | ||
Comment 32•11 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8448869 [details]
home-dividers-3col-flame.png (updated 07/01)
Please refer to Peter's spec: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=8448304
The text labels and the dividers should be moved up 3px
Thanks!
Attachment #8448869 -
Flags: ui-review?(padamczyk) → ui-review-
Reporter | ||
Comment 33•11 years ago
|
||
This is the flame sized screenshot from Peter's spec. There are 2 issues:
1. The app labels are 3px (0.3rem) too low
2. The divider is 3px (0.3rem) too high
Flags: needinfo?(sfoster)
Assignee | ||
Updated•11 years ago
|
Attachment #8449650 -
Attachment mime type: image/jpeg → image/png
Assignee | ||
Updated•11 years ago
|
Attachment #8449650 -
Attachment mime type: image/png → image/jpeg
Reporter | ||
Comment 34•11 years ago
|
||
Attachment #8449650 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Assignee | ||
Comment 35•11 years ago
|
||
Update eleventy-billion. Sorry as changes to either column configuration can affect the other I have to update both screen caps.
Attachment #8448869 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8449758 -
Flags: ui-review?(padamczyk)
Flags: needinfo?(sfoster)
Assignee | ||
Comment 36•11 years ago
|
||
And the 4-col. In this one I essentially unapply the scaling to normalize the labels. Also applying that 0.75 scaling to the divider height seemed to get a result that matched the mockup (though as this is a fractional pixel value we should double check it on a 1:1 pixel ratio device)
Attachment #8448872 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8449762 -
Flags: ui-review?(padamczyk)
Reporter | ||
Updated•11 years ago
|
Attachment #8449762 -
Flags: ui-review?(padamczyk) → ui-review+
Reporter | ||
Updated•11 years ago
|
Attachment #8449758 -
Flags: ui-review?(padamczyk) → ui-review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 37•11 years ago
|
||
We're all good to go. I'm out until July 8th, if you or someone gets a minute could you land and request uplift? Otherwise I'll do it when I'm back next week
Flags: needinfo?(kgrandon)
Whiteboard: ux-tracking, visual design, visual-tracking, [ft:systemsfe][systemsfe] → ux-tracking, visual design, visual-tracking, [ft:systemsfe][systemsfe][checkin-needed]
Updated•11 years ago
|
Flags: needinfo?(kgrandon)
Comment 38•11 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Sam Foster [:sfoster] from comment #37)
> We're all good to go. I'm out until July 8th, if you or someone gets a
> minute could you land and request uplift? Otherwise I'll do it when I'm back
> next week
Thanks for sticking with this Sam!
Master: https://github.com/mozilla-b2g/gaia/commit/0a217d24a7b21fef96bc8057d644f49f79068bfe
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 11 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Comment 39•11 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8446242 [details] [review]
PR with changes to divider style and grid item pixelHeight
We would like to have these style changes in 2.0 for the vertical homescreen.
Attachment #8446242 -
Flags: approval-gaia-v2.0?(bbajaj)
Updated•11 years ago
|
Whiteboard: ux-tracking, visual design, visual-tracking, [ft:systemsfe][systemsfe][checkin-needed] → ux-tracking, visual design, visual-tracking, [ft:systemsfe][systemsfe]
Updated•11 years ago
|
Attachment #8446242 -
Flags: approval-gaia-v2.0?(bbajaj) → approval-gaia-v2.0+
Comment 40•11 years ago
|
||
status-b2g-v2.0:
--- → fixed
status-b2g-v2.1:
--- → fixed
Comment 41•11 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Sam Foster [:sfoster] from comment #37)
> We're all good to go. I'm out until July 8th, if you or someone gets a
> minute could you land and request uplift? Otherwise I'll do it when I'm back
> next week
Great work Sam! Thanks for sticking with this!
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•