Closed
Bug 1026586
Opened 10 years ago
Closed 10 years ago
Using Fira as default font in Bugzilla
Categories
(bugzilla.mozilla.org Graveyard :: Sandstone/Mozilla Skin, defect)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: padamczyk, Assigned: glob)
Details
Attachments
(3 files, 1 obsolete file)
Can we set Fira Sans & Mono as the default fonts on Bugzilla?
We are trying to get more and more products to use it as its a Mozilla product. Its a complete font and this would also be a good place to dog food it.
Font can be found here:
https://github.com/mozilla/Fira
Updated•10 years ago
|
Summary: Using Fira in Bugzilla → Using Fira as default font in Bugzilla
Assignee: ui → nobody
Component: User Interface → Sandstone/Mozilla Skin
Product: Bugzilla → bugzilla.mozilla.org
QA Contact: default-qa
Version: unspecified → Production
bmo currently follows the sandstone styleguide at https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/styleguide/websites/sandstone/typefaces/ which specifies use of the open-sans typeface.
are there plans to update the styleguide?
dkl - thoughts on switching to fira?
Comment 3•10 years ago
|
||
I also think that the style guide should use Fira to promote the Mozilla brand. Will file a bug for that.
Note that Fira Mono is currently broken.
https://github.com/mozilla/Fira/issues/44
Comment 4•10 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8442856 [details]
bugzilla with fira
Looks great to me :)
Attachment #8442856 -
Flags: feedback?(dkl) → feedback+
Comment 5•10 years ago
|
||
This is the patch I used to take a look on my local checkout.
Comment on attachment 8442935 [details] [diff] [review]
1026586_1.patch
i have a slightly different patch which includes more weights. i'll attach for review once the mono font issue is resolved.
Attachment #8442935 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
fira 3.110 has been released. will attach fonts.
Attachment #8449435 -
Flags: review?(dkl)
Comment 9•10 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8449435 [details] [diff] [review]
1026586_1.patch
Review of attachment 8449435 [details] [diff] [review]:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Looks good and no issues that I can see. r=dkl
Attachment #8449435 -
Flags: review?(dkl) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 10•10 years ago
|
||
To ssh://gitolite3@git.mozilla.org/webtools/bmo/bugzilla.git
9b47eb6..eb33aae master -> master
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 10 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Comment 11•10 years ago
|
||
And I wondered whether somebody broke my fonts when I got this awful appearance on bugzilla today.
Fuzzy and hard to read on Win XP. I have gfx.font_rendering.cleartype.use_for_downloadable_fonts=false.
Seems to be the first font that looks better with cleartype than without.
Comment 12•10 years ago
|
||
the body font is not exactly a good place to "promote the brand". that's why most style guides use more "standard" typefaces, that don't really stand out.
Updated•6 years ago
|
Product: bugzilla.mozilla.org → bugzilla.mozilla.org Graveyard
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•