Closed
Bug 1028698
Opened 10 years ago
Closed 10 years ago
IonMonkey: Implement Abs Recover Instruction
Categories
(Core :: JavaScript Engine: JIT, defect)
Core
JavaScript Engine: JIT
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
mozilla33
People
(Reporter: contact, Assigned: contact, Mentored)
References
(Blocks 1 open bug)
Details
Attachments
(1 file, 2 obsolete files)
6.96 KB,
patch
|
nbp
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
Implement Abs in js/src/jit/Recover.cpp.
See Bug 1003801 for explanation.
Updated•10 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → wengremi
Status: UNCONFIRMED → ASSIGNED
Ever confirmed: true
Attachment #8446720 -
Flags: review?(nicolas.b.pierron)
Comment 2•10 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8446720 [details] [diff] [review]
bug1028698.patch
Review of attachment 8446720 [details] [diff] [review]:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
This sounds good.
A few last thing and this can land. ;)
::: js/src/jit-test/tests/ion/dce-with-rinstructions.js
@@ +385,5 @@
> return i;
> }
> +var uceFault_abs = eval(uneval(uceFault).replace('uceFault', 'uceFault_abs'));
> +function rabs_number(i) {
> + var x = Math.abs(-42);
Use "i - 42" instead, such as we cannot remove the Math.abs function in any way while compiling this function.
::: js/src/jit/Recover.h
@@ +330,5 @@
> return 1;
> }
> bool recover(JSContext *cx, SnapshotIterator &iter) const;
> };
> +class RAbs MOZ_FINAL : public RInstruction
nit: add an extra new line before the class definition.
::: js/src/jsmath.cpp
@@ +87,5 @@
> JS_ResolveStub,
> JS_ConvertStub
> };
> bool
> +js_math_abs_handle(JSContext *cx, js::HandleValue v, js::MutableHandleValue r)
nit: same here, before bool.
Attachment #8446720 -
Flags: review?(nicolas.b.pierron) → feedback+
Test the patch whether extra new lines are present or not
Attachment #8446720 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
It is very weird that there are not extra lines in the diff because in details, we can see that I added these lines. An explanation ?
Attachment #8447220 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8447228 -
Flags: review?(nicolas.b.pierron)
Comment 5•10 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Rémi WENG from comment #4)
> Created attachment 8447228 [details] [diff] [review]
> bug1028698.patch
>
> It is very weird that there are not extra lines in the diff because in
> details, we can see that I added these lines. An explanation ?
Is there an unnumbered line?
Comment 6•10 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8447228 [details] [diff] [review]
bug1028698.patch
Review of attachment 8447228 [details] [diff] [review]:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Awesome :)
I will send this patch to try, and land it for you.
Do you want to try other kind of Bugs?
Attachment #8447228 -
Flags: review?(nicolas.b.pierron) → review+
Comment 7•10 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Nicolas B. Pierron [:nbp] from comment #5)
> (In reply to Rémi WENG from comment #4)
> > Created attachment 8447228 [details] [diff] [review]
> > bug1028698.patch
> >
> > It is very weird that there are not extra lines in the diff because in
> > details, we can see that I added these lines. An explanation ?
>
> Is there an unnumbered line?
It seems not.
> Do you want to try other kind of Bugs?
With pleasure :)
Comment 9•10 years ago
|
||
Comment 10•10 years ago
|
||
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 10 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla33
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•