Closed
Bug 1034271
Opened 11 years ago
Closed 11 years ago
[SMS] Background graphic is out of date
Categories
(Firefox OS Graveyard :: Gaia::SMS, defect, P1)
Tracking
(b2g-v2.0 verified, b2g-v2.1 verified)
VERIFIED
FIXED
2.0 S6 (18july)
People
(Reporter: amylee, Assigned: pivanov)
Details
(Whiteboard: [2.0-VH-bug-bash])
Attachments
(8 files)
24.41 KB,
image/png
|
Details | |
28.86 KB,
application/zip
|
Details | |
46 bytes,
text/x-github-pull-request
|
julienw
:
review+
bajaj
:
approval-gaia-v2.0+
|
Details | Review |
15.08 KB,
image/png
|
amylee
:
ui-review-
|
Details |
11.68 KB,
image/png
|
Details | |
25.06 KB,
image/png
|
amylee
:
ui-review+
|
Details |
24.79 KB,
image/png
|
Details | |
27.24 KB,
image/png
|
Details |
The chat bubble graphic background in SMS when you have no messages is out of date and needs to be updated. I am assuming the graphic is a transparent png. Pavel, if you have time to take this bug can you please confirm that it is a transparent .png that I need to provide in @1, @1.5, @2, and @2.25 sizes?
Thanks
Reporter | ||
Comment 1•11 years ago
|
||
Screenshot of chat bubble background that needs to be updated
Updated•11 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [2.0-VH-bug-bash][systemsfe]
Updated•11 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [2.0-VH-bug-bash]
Comment 2•11 years ago
|
||
Amy, here is the current file: https://github.com/mozilla-b2g/gaia/blob/master/apps/sms/style/images/SMS_200x200_bubble.png
(and I notice the 2.25x asset is badly named and won't show up in current code...)
Amy, is it you or Vicky (from TEF, our usual VD) who should provide the updated image?
Flags: needinfo?(vpg)
Flags: needinfo?(amlee)
Assignee | ||
Updated•11 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → pivanov
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•11 years ago
|
||
Sure I will take it,
just need all of the versions of that image @1x, @1.5x, @2x, @2.25x
Thanks :)
Reporter | ||
Comment 5•11 years ago
|
||
Hi
Here is the chat bubble graphic to be updated. Thanks!
Flags: needinfo?(amlee)
Assignee | ||
Comment 6•11 years ago
|
||
Attachment #8451103 -
Flags: ui-review?(amlee)
Attachment #8451103 -
Flags: review?(felash)
Comment 7•11 years ago
|
||
Hey, here is the screenshot of the patch.
To me, the bubble looks slightly too high, but please tell us what you think.
Attachment #8451149 -
Flags: ui-review?(amlee)
Updated•11 years ago
|
Attachment #8451103 -
Flags: ui-review?(amlee)
Reporter | ||
Comment 8•11 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8451149 [details]
2014-07-04-21-48-00.png
Hi,
Yeah I agree. I looked at the graphic in the contacts app and it's vertically centered to the screen. I think the position should match on all the apps. Can you vertically center the graphic to the white space? Thanks
Attachment #8451149 -
Flags: ui-review?(amlee) → ui-review-
Comment 9•11 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8451103 [details] [review]
patch for Gaia/master
What Amy said.
Attachment #8451103 -
Flags: review?(felash) → review-
Assignee | ||
Comment 10•11 years ago
|
||
Here is a shot with vertically center the graphic to the white space.
Attachment #8451471 -
Flags: ui-review?(amlee)
Reporter | ||
Comment 11•11 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Pavel Ivanov [:ivanovpavel] from comment #10)
> Created attachment 8451471 [details]
> After patch screenshot
>
> Here is a shot with vertically center the graphic to the white space.
Hi Pavel,
Can you send me the patch for the new version? I just want to see it on the Flame device. Thanks!
Flags: needinfo?(pivanov)
Assignee | ||
Comment 12•11 years ago
|
||
Hey Amy,
my PR is up to date you can check it
Flags: needinfo?(pivanov)
Reporter | ||
Comment 13•11 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Pavel Ivanov [:ivanovpavel] from comment #12)
> Hey Amy,
> my PR is up to date you can check it
Hey Pavel,
Can you send me a screenshot of the flame? The patch didn't update :-(
Assignee | ||
Comment 15•11 years ago
|
||
Attachment #8453935 -
Flags: ui-review?(amlee)
Flags: needinfo?(pivanov)
Reporter | ||
Comment 16•11 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8453935 [details]
After patch screenshot on Flame
Looks good. Thanks!
Attachment #8453935 -
Flags: ui-review?(amlee) → ui-review+
Assignee | ||
Updated•11 years ago
|
Attachment #8451103 -
Flags: review- → review?(felash)
Comment 17•11 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8451103 [details] [review]
patch for Gaia/master
NOTE: Please see https://wiki.mozilla.org/Release_Management/B2G_Landing to better understand the B2G approval process and landings.
[Approval Request Comment]
[Bug caused by] (feature/regressing bug #): -
[User impact] if declined: low: invalid image in the background of the SMS app that has no messages
[Testing completed]: yes
[Risk to taking this patch] (and alternatives if risky): very low
[String changes made]: none
Attachment #8451103 -
Flags: review?(felash)
Attachment #8451103 -
Flags: review+
Attachment #8451103 -
Flags: approval-gaia-v2.0?(bbajaj)
Comment 18•11 years ago
|
||
master: ce6a9e7cf5eb51843766908b8bcb7e8a64eecfc9
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 11 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Comment 19•11 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8451103 [details] [review]
patch for Gaia/master
low risk css change, looks good to land with ux review+
Attachment #8451103 -
Flags: approval-gaia-v2.0?(bbajaj) → approval-gaia-v2.0+
Comment 20•11 years ago
|
||
Comment 21•11 years ago
|
||
Comment 22•11 years ago
|
||
Comment 23•11 years ago
|
||
This issue has been verified successfully on Flame v2.1 & v2.0
See attachment: Flame 2.0.png and Flame 2.1.png
Reproducing rate: 0/5
Flame 2.1 versions:
Gaia-Rev 38e17b0219cbc50a4ad6f51101898f89e513a552
Gecko-Rev https://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-b2g34_v2_1/rev/8b92c4b8f59a
Build-ID 20141205001201
Version 34.0
Device-Name flame
FW-Release 4.4.2
FW-Incremental eng.cltbld.20141205.035305
FW-Date Fri Dec 5 03:53:16 EST 2014
Bootloader L1TC00011880
Flame 2.0 versions:
Gaia-Rev 856863962362030174bae4e03d59c3ebbc182473
Gecko-Rev https://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-b2g32_v2_0/rev/e40fe21e37f1
Build-ID 20141207000206
Version 32.0
Device-Name flame
FW-Release 4.4.2
FW-Incremental eng.cltbld.20141207.034341
FW-Date Sun Dec 7 03:43:52 EST 2014
Bootloader L1TC00011880
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•