1034493 - Usage app shows no user feedback while loading data

Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX

(Firefox OS Graveyard :: Gaia::Cost Control, defect)

Description

[:gerard-majax]

As reported in bug 1034490, when loading the data that takes 30+secs, I have no user feedback informing me that it's doing something.

Comment 1

[bhavana bajaj [:bajaj]]

Adding qawanted to check this on branches and confirm the regression.

Comment 2

[Marcelino Veiga Tuimil [:sonmarce]]

Marina is checking in bug 1034490 if there is a problem regarding a big amount of data stored

Comment 3

[Pi Wei Cheng [:piwei] (inactive)]

As tested and stated in https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1034490#c7 , QA Wanted is unable to reproduce this issue.

Since a night has passed, I tested the Usage app on Flame 2.0 in a 2-day-span and it still displays both wifi and data correctly & immediately upon accessing the app.

Comment 4

[:gerard-majax]

(In reply to Pi Wei Cheng (piwei) from comment #3)
> As tested and stated in
> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1034490#c7 , QA Wanted is
> unable to reproduce this issue.
> 
> Since a night has passed, I tested the Usage app on Flame 2.0 in a
> 2-day-span and it still displays both wifi and data correctly & immediately
> upon accessing the app.

A night VS profile dating from v1.0.1 ? I'm not sure you are comparing the same amount of data.

Comment 5

[Pi Wei Cheng [:piwei] (inactive)]

(In reply to Alexandre LISSY :gerard-majax from comment #4)
> A night VS profile dating from v1.0.1 ? I'm not sure you are comparing the
> same amount of data.

It was never mentioned in your STR (if there is one) that your 'profile' is from v1.0.1.
I wasn't aware that Firefox accounts are supported earlier than v2.0 either, but then someone else pointed out to me that by 'profile', it's not firefox accounts that you're referring to.

Comment 6

[bhavana bajaj [:bajaj]]

This could be nice improvement to have in future releases, not something we would blockship a release for.

Comment 7

[Joshua Mitchell (Inactive)]

(In reply to bhavana bajaj [:bajaj] [NOT reading Bugmail, needInfo please] from comment #1)
> Adding qawanted to check this on branches and confirm the regression.

There seems to be something specific about the data being used for the Usage App. QA-Wanted is currently unable to repro this. Once the particulars are hammered out we can re-visit the branch-check request.