Closed
Bug 1045683
Opened 10 years ago
Closed 10 years ago
Repo menu: Use a separate repository group for the rentable twig repos
Categories
(Tree Management :: Treeherder, defect, P2)
Tree Management
Treeherder
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: emorley, Assigned: KWierso)
References
Details
Attachments
(1 file)
Currently the "development" repository group includes repos such as mozilla-central, mozilla-inbound etc (which is fine), but also includes the releng rentable repos such as cedar, ash, oak. In addition there are teams that have semi-active team repos that perhaps don't belong alongside mozilla-inbound etc.
I'm thinking that it would be good to distinguish between mozilla-central et al and cedar/ash/... for the purposes of:
* making the repos menu clearer (ie having a separate list for both)
* assigning permissions (when we have more granular treeherder permissions in the future)
* assigning job exclusion profiles to one group but not the other
I'm thinking perhaps we could call the new repo group "project", ie:
development:
* mozilla-central
* mozilla-inbound
* fx-team
* gaia-master
...
project:
* ash
* cedar
* services-central
...
@sheriffs: Thoughts?
Reporter | ||
Updated•10 years ago
|
No longer blocks: treeherder-sheriff-transition
Reporter | ||
Updated•10 years ago
|
Summary: Use a separate repository group for the rentable twig repos → Repo menu: Use a separate repository group for the rentable twig repos
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•10 years ago
|
||
In theory, this splits all of the twigs and a few other project repos out to their own category. I haven't tested this at all, but it looked right to me.
Attachment #8486607 -
Flags: review?(cdawson)
Updated•10 years ago
|
Attachment #8486607 -
Flags: review?(cdawson) → review+
Reporter | ||
Comment 2•10 years ago
|
||
Assignee: nobody → kwierso
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 10 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•