Open
Bug 1060904
Opened 11 years ago
Updated 3 years ago
Black box top N frames when deriving log message source location
Categories
(DevTools :: Console, enhancement, P3)
DevTools
Console
Tracking
(Not tracked)
NEW
People
(Reporter: till, Unassigned)
Details
It's fairly common for log messages to be managed centrally for larger applications. In that case, all messages are displayed as originating from the same source location, which isn't all that helpful.
Instead, it'd be nice to be able to black-box the top N stack frames when looking up the source location.
I realize that this might have unacceptable overhead in the case of background logging with the console closed. Maybe it's ok to only do it if the console is open when the message is logged? Or perhaps even restrict it to debuggee compartments?
Comment 1•10 years ago
|
||
This is the approach used in Chrome devtools
Reporter | ||
Comment 2•10 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Zac Spitzer from comment #1)
> This is the approach used in Chrome devtools
I assume you mean this? https://gist.github.com/paulirish/c307a5a585ddbcc17242
If so, that doesn't really help our use case, because we most definitely don't want to blackbox the entire script the logging function is in. It'd have to be more targeted than per-file blackboxing.
Updated•7 years ago
|
Product: Firefox → DevTools
Comment 3•7 years ago
|
||
I guess that's something that could be solved with customizable callstacks (See Bug 882825)
Severity: normal → enhancement
Comment 4•7 years ago
|
||
Honestly, this is one of the main reasons I haven't used FF as my primary browser for development in several years.
Could it be added as an preference? It's not a perfect solution, but it's far better than the current situation.
The reason I use a central logging function is so that when an error is encountered, I maintain a buffer of console
log entries and I include that with the stack in error reporting, which is extremely useful for diagnosing
problems from end users.
Comment 5•7 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Zac Spitzer from comment #4)
> Honestly, this is one of the main reasons I haven't used FF as my primary
> browser for development in several years.
>
> Could it be added as an preference? It's not a perfect solution, but it's
> far better than the current situation.
>
> The reason I use a central logging function is so that when an error is
> encountered, I maintain a buffer of console
> log entries and I include that with the stack in error reporting, which is
> extremely useful for diagnosing
> problems from end users.
Thanks for your reply :)
So how's Firefox acting differently than other browsers here ?
Comment 6•7 years ago
|
||
In Chrome if you have two files, base.js and app.js and base has a wrapped console.log function like base.logger(),
if you blackbox base.js and call base.logger() from app.js, the console log shows the source file and line from app.js
Comment 7•7 years ago
|
||
The blackboxing is also applied in the Chrome network panel, Chrome has an extra initiator column which shows
which file and line number triggered the network request.
FF has the stack trace in the network panel, request detail view, but as stack trace doesn't exclude
blackboxed files, you see all the various libraries which can be pretty verbose
Updated•6 years ago
|
Priority: -- → P3
Updated•3 years ago
|
Severity: normal → S3
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•