Closed
Bug 106206
Opened 23 years ago
Closed 22 years ago
keyword: and data: protocol handlers should be moved to necko2
Categories
(Core :: Networking, defect, P3)
Core
Networking
Tracking
()
VERIFIED
FIXED
Future
People
(Reporter: pavlov, Assigned: alecf)
References
Details
(Keywords: embed, memory-footprint, topembed-)
Attachments
(1 file)
23.03 KB,
patch
|
pavlov
:
review+
darin.moz
:
superreview+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
After running mozilla for a while under purecoverage (ran jrgm's tests, etc), I
see us not using the data protocol handler or the keyword protocol handler. I
recommend we move that code in to necko2. During my run, necko2 was never
loaded.
Comment 1•23 years ago
|
||
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 98753 ***
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 23 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
Comment 2•23 years ago
|
||
nope, this is not a dupe of bug 98753... that is something related but different.
Status: RESOLVED → REOPENED
Resolution: DUPLICATE → ---
Updated•23 years ago
|
Priority: -- → P3
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla0.9.7
Comment 3•23 years ago
|
||
-> 0.9.9
Status: REOPENED → ASSIGNED
Target Milestone: mozilla0.9.7 → mozilla0.9.9
Comment 5•23 years ago
|
||
easy to fix, but not critical -> moz 1.1
Keywords: footprint
Target Milestone: mozilla1.0 → mozilla1.1
Comment 6•23 years ago
|
||
EDT Triage (chofmann et al) - will pick this change up if it becomes available.
Updated•23 years ago
|
Target Milestone: mozilla1.1alpha → ---
Assignee | ||
Comment 8•22 years ago
|
||
I might take this. For now just adding it to my list.
following the conversation in 98753 about what procotols are needed.
data: is increasingly popular, and we are receiving a steady set of bugs asking
for it to work correctly. It is also described in RFCs, so I think that
keyword: is not described in an RFC, is proprietary, and the original design
goals are still not well understood (at least by me and anyone I've asked about
it).
(current docs are http://www.mozilla.org/docs/end-user/internet-keywords.html,
I'll be updating it soon w/ a more user-oriented guide).
Until we understand more about how vendors want their keyword/search systems to
work, I'm not confident keyword: works the way they need it to.
Summary: keyword and data protocol handlers should be moved to necko2 → keyword: and data: protocol handlers should be moved to necko2
Assignee | ||
Comment 10•22 years ago
|
||
Here's the patch. who wants to review? this is easy stuff, mostly just makefile
changes... on my release build, this moves 4k of optimized code from necko.dll
to necko2.dll.
Assignee | ||
Comment 11•22 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 112189 [details] [diff] [review]
move data and keyword into necko2
Sorry for more 1.3b reviews, but this is an easy one - just moving stuff around
to save some footprint on embedding.
Attachment #112189 -
Flags: superreview?(darin)
Attachment #112189 -
Flags: review?(pavlov)
Comment 12•22 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 112189 [details] [diff] [review]
move data and keyword into necko2
sr=darin
Attachment #112189 -
Flags: superreview?(darin) → superreview+
Reporter | ||
Updated•22 years ago
|
Attachment #112189 -
Flags: review?(pavlov) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 14•22 years ago
|
||
fix is in.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 23 years ago → 22 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Comment 15•22 years ago
|
||
alecf: do you have cvs checkin output or a bonzai query that can show the
checkin? if so, you can verify this yourself. If not, I'll get to this when I
get a chance.
Assignee | ||
Comment 16•22 years ago
|
||
Comment 18•22 years ago
|
||
The data protocol should be put back into the embedding build. Taking it out
breaks the ActiveX control, and seriously breaks its functionality in my
application (which uses the data protocol exclusively).
Comment 19•22 years ago
|
||
Mike: I dont' know anything about ActiveX, but I'm going to assume it is
important :)
I recommend you create a NEW bug, and describe this dependency, so that the
right people can think about un-moving data: if needed.
Since this bug is fixed, I'd like to leave it that way.
Comment 20•22 years ago
|
||
The active-X control uses a data url as its default url when its created. It is
used to display title of the control when it is put on a design form ( Visual
Basic). I am not sure if this will prevent the active-x control from loading.
CCing Adam Lock on this
Comment 21•22 years ago
|
||
Yes, the ActiveX control uses it. There is bug 189230 for the issue already
which affects the view-source protocol too.
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•