Closed Bug 1064840 Opened 10 years ago Closed 10 years ago

Don't show apz-failure visual indicator if there is a content layer with that APZ

Categories

(Core :: Panning and Zooming, defect)

All
Gonk (Firefox OS)
defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

()

RESOLVED FIXED
mozilla35
blocking-b2g 2.1+
Tracking Status
firefox33 --- unaffected
firefox34 --- fixed
firefox35 --- fixed
b2g-v2.0 --- unaffected
b2g-v2.1 --- fixed
b2g-v2.2 --- fixed

People

(Reporter: kats, Assigned: kats)

References

Details

Attachments

(1 file, 1 obsolete file)

From bug 1063158 comment 13: > In bug 1053992 I think we should just suppress the visual marker if there > are layers with content and FrameMetrics with the same ID as the > FrameMetrics of the scrollinfo layer. This bug is to implement this.
[Blocking Requested - why for this release]: Since Bug 1063158 is marked as wontfix, and this bug is created to suppress the visual indicator warning, it is required to verify Bug 1026271
blocking-b2g: --- → 2.1?
Attached patch Patch (obsolete) — Splinter Review
Verified that this works by flipping the layout.async-containerless-scroll.enabled pref to false and testing on the case in bug 1011639.
Attachment #8486455 - Flags: review?(botond)
Comment on attachment 8486455 [details] [diff] [review] Patch Review of attachment 8486455 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- ::: gfx/layers/composite/AsyncCompositionManager.cpp @@ +575,5 @@ > &overscrollTransform); > > + Matrix4x4 asyncTransform = Matrix4x4(asyncTransformWithoutOverscroll) * overscrollTransform; > + if (!aLayer->IsScrollInfoLayer() || asyncTransform.IsIdentity()) { > + controller->MarkAsyncTransformAppliedToContent(); I'm not sure how I feel about an "async transform applied to content" flag whose interpretation seems to be "at least one layer associated with the APZ is a non-scrollinfo layer OR the transform is the identity transform". I think it would make more sense to have this flag only mean the first thing ("at least one layer associated with the APZ is a non-scrollinfo layer") (and perhaps alter the name accordingly), and check the second condition separately. ::: gfx/layers/composite/ContainerLayerComposite.cpp @@ +434,5 @@ > // on it down to the bottom using GetFirstChild and not worry about walking onto another > // underlying layer. > for (LayerMetricsWrapper i(aContainer); i; i = i.GetFirstChild()) { > if (AsyncPanZoomController* apzc = i.GetApzc()) { > + if (!apzc->GetAsyncTransformAppliedToContent()) { That is, here we would check !apzc->GetAsyncTransformAppliedToContent() && !Matrix4x4(apzc->GetCurrentTransform()).IsIdentity().
Attached patch Patch v2Splinter Review
Good call! Updated
Attachment #8486455 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8486455 - Flags: review?(botond)
Attachment #8486501 - Flags: review?(botond)
Comment on attachment 8486501 [details] [diff] [review] Patch v2 Review of attachment 8486501 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- ::: gfx/layers/composite/AsyncCompositionManager.cpp @@ +573,5 @@ > controller->SampleContentTransformForFrame(&asyncTransformWithoutOverscroll, > scrollOffset, > &overscrollTransform); > > + Matrix4x4 asyncTransform = Matrix4x4(asyncTransformWithoutOverscroll) * overscrollTransform; You no longer need this declared up here.
Attachment #8486501 - Flags: review?(botond) → review+
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 10 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla35
Comment on attachment 8486501 [details] [diff] [review] Patch v2 Approval Request Comment [Feature/regressing bug #]: bug 1053992 [User impact if declined]: the visual indicator added in bug 1053992 is not particularly useful without this change, as it provides incorrect indications. [Describe test coverage new/current, TBPL]: manual testing [Risks and why]: low risk, code is pretty well understood. should only affect non-default configurations (i.e. when the FPS counter is enabled from the developer HUD or via prefs) [String/UUID change made/needed]: none
Attachment #8486501 - Flags: approval-mozilla-aurora?
blocking-b2g: 2.1? → 2.1+
Attachment #8486501 - Flags: approval-mozilla-aurora? → approval-mozilla-aurora+
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: