Closed Bug 1069012 Opened 9 years ago Closed 7 years ago
unprefix :placeholder-shown pseudo-class and ::placeholder pseudo-element
Maybe not yet, but at some point we should unprefix the :placeholder-shown pseudo-class and ::placeholder pseudo-element. We had code for the pseudo-class, but it was removed in bug 737786, which added support for the pseudo-element, which we currently implement prefixed. The names were agreed by the CSSWG in http://krijnhoetmer.nl/irc-logs/css/20130206#l-654 . Only the pseudo-class is in a spec http://dev.w3.org/csswg/selectors/#placeholder partly because there doesn't appear to be an active spec approprite for the pseudo-element. http://caniuse.com/#feat=css-placeholder is somewhat misleading.
Why change the name?
The CSS working group resolved on these names after a long discussion; I wouldn't reopen that discussion without a very good reason.
Chrome and WebKit supported.
@percyley, just checked, is not jet supported on Chrome, not even on Chrome canary 49.0.2593.0.
Released in Chrome 47 stable with tons of bugs https://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=451120#c13
::placeholder has been unprefixed in Safari Tech Preview 7. See https://webkit.org/blog/6640/release-notes-for-safari-technology-preview-release-7/ > * Added the unprefixed version of the pseudo element ::placeholder (r202066)
(In reply to David Baron :dbaron: ⌚️UTC-7 from comment #0) > Only the pseudo-class is in a spec [...] partly because > there doesn't appear to be an active spec appropriate for the pseudo-element. ::placeholder is currently part of Pseudo-Elements Level 4: https://www.w3.org/TR/css-pseudo-4/#placeholder-pseudo
Since I'm not 100% sure if we'd need to keep both the prefixed and unprefixed versions for now (which is proving trickier), I figured I'd first offer a version which just removes the unprefixed version. A try run is fine: https://treeherder.mozilla.org/#/jobs?repo=try&revision=1ba7eb550f0c&selectedJob=26870596 I'll work on a version that keeps the prefixed unprefixed versions though, since I'm guessing there is no telemetry on whether it's safe to just support the unprefixed version.
Assignee: nobody → wisniewskit
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Attachment #8787829 - Flags: review?(bzbarsky)
And here's a patch with both the prefixed and unprefixing versions. A try run only shows unrelated stuff: https://treeherder.mozilla.org/#/jobs?repo=try&revision=07f7958d9c5a
Comment on attachment 8787919 [details] [diff] [review] 1069012-unprefix-placeholder-pseudoelement.diff In devtools/shared/css-properties-db.js, should ":placeholder" really be sorted in with the moz-prefixed things? I'd guess not. In layout/inspector/tests/test_getCSSPseudoElementNames.html it almost certainly should _not_ be at the end, but rather before all the moz-prefixed bits. >+++ b/layout/style/nsCSSParser.cpp >+ // We currently allow :-moz-placeholder and ::-moz-placeholder and >+ // ::placeholder. We have to // be a bit stricter regarding the Stray "//" in there. >+++ b/layout/style/test/test_selectors.html >+ should_serialize_to("input::placeholder", "input::placeholder"); Should have a test for ::-moz-placeholder here too, to make sure it doesn't serialize as ::placeholder, right? r=me, but please send an intent to ship and file a followup to remove ::-moz-placeholder.
Attachment #8787919 - Flags: review?(bzbarsky) → review+
Thanks, Boris. I just an intent-to-ship (https://groups.google.com/forum/?_escaped_fragment_=topic/mozilla.dev.platform/FkAJkVOJF74#!topic/mozilla.dev.platform/FkAJkVOJF74) and will address your review comments as soon as possible.
Alright, here's a fresh version of the patch that addresses your comments. Note that there was already an existing test for ::-moz-placeholder serialization (a few lines beneath that one), so I didn't have to add that. Since the changes were trivial and non-functional, and the patch still applies cleanly to inbound, I'm carrying over r+ and requesting checkin.
Attachment #8787919 - Attachment is obsolete: true
landed as http://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/b31b1d10f122 but pulsebot failed to comment
Posted the site compatibility doc: https://www.fxsitecompat.com/en-CA/docs/2016/placeholder-pseudo-element-and-placeholder-shown-pseudo-class-have-been-unprefixed/
Documented the changes: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/:placeholder-shown https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/::placeholder https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/::-moz-placeholder https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/:-moz-placeholder https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/Firefox/Releases/51 Sebastian
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.