about:addons uses a custom "greyscale" SVG filter: > filter: url("chrome://mozapps/skin/extensions/extensions.svg#greyscale"); We should replace this with: > filter: grayscale(1); Files that need to be updated: http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/search?string=greyscale&find=%2Fmozapps%2Fextensions%2F
Hi Could you assign me this bug please? Thanks, David
(In reply to Dão Gottwald [:dao] from comment #0) > We should replace this with: > > > filter: grayscale(1); > and also remove extensions.svg file ?
(In reply to Ekanan Ketunuti from comment #2) > (In reply to Dão Gottwald [:dao] from comment #0) > > We should replace this with: > > > > > filter: grayscale(1); > > > > > and also remove extensions.svg file ? yes
I have replaced the custom "greyscale" SVG filter with grayscale(1) in all the files you mentioned and deleted the extensions.svg files. Can you please review my patch. Although I am not assigned the bug, will my patch merge to the main code. Thanks in advance, Kapil
Comment on attachment 8504866 [details] [diff] [review] Replace greyscale SVG filter with grayscale(1) You also need to remove extensions.svg from jar.mn files, otherwise the build will fail: http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/search?string=extensions.svg&find=jar.mn Looks good otherwise!
Ok, I have removed extensions.svg from jar.mn files. Please check the attachments. Thanks, Kapil
Sorry, I forgot to delete extensions.svg file from extensions folder, so don't check the previous attachment. Check this one please. Thanks
Attachment #8505965 - Flags: review?(dao)
Comment on attachment 8505965 [details] [diff] [review] Replace greyscale SVG filter with grayscale(1) Looks good, thanks!
Attachment #8505965 - Flags: review?(dao) → review+
Attachment #8504866 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Last Resolved: 5 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla36
Hi, I'm just wondering, for future reference, is there much use in people being assigned bugs if another person comes along and fixes it? I'm doing this as part of a module at Coventry University in the UK, so just querying for future use. Thanks, David
We do much prefer it if people don't do that. You really should ask in the bug to find out if the assignee has abandoned the bug and give them a chance to respond if not. Having said that Kapil is new too and doesn't know the etiquette yet so once he does post a patch as the first thing he does we're left in a difficult position. Please don't be too discouraged, this doesn't happen often and if you want to work on some other similar bugs Dao and I can suggest some.
Thanks Robert for the response, much appreciated. I'm looking through some bugs at the moment - will get back to you if I struggle to find any others!
Thanks Robert for the support, David with all the good intentions since there was no activity on the bug for a week I safely assumed it was okay to work on it. Anyway, henceforth I will make sure that I follow the correct norms and best practices. Thanks
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.