Closed Bug 1084679 Opened 10 years ago Closed 10 years ago

Track invalidation rects during image decoding on Decoder, not imgStatusTracker

Categories

(Core :: Graphics: ImageLib, defect)

defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

()

RESOLVED FIXED
mozilla36

People

(Reporter: seth, Assigned: seth)

References

(Blocks 1 open bug)

Details

Attachments

(1 file, 4 obsolete files)

To bring sanity to the imgStatusTracker code (bug 910441), but also because it's going to be necessary in the long term to support multiple decoders for the same RasterImage (bug 1079627), we should track our invalidation rect during decoding on Decoder rather than on imgStatusTracker. The nice thing is, we basically do this already! We need some refactoring to completely remove the dependency on the imgStatusTracker copy of this information, though.
Here's the patch. I think this actually worked out pretty nicely, though adding more complexity to the recursive notification code in FinishedSomeDecoding is a bummer. It'd be nice to get rid of that entirely.
Attachment #8507298 - Flags: review?(tnikkel)
Here's a try job. There will likely be some stray oranges left over from bug 1084136. I'll submit another one once that bug is totally green, but I want to get a head start on debugging this patch: https://tbpl.mozilla.org/?tree=Try&rev=01ed9f193d68
OK, bug 1084136 is green now. I'm still debugging the 'test_synchronized_animation.html' failure that the try job in comment 2 revealed, but I think it's worth submitting a new try job to get an idea of where this patch stands now: https://tbpl.mozilla.org/?tree=Try&rev=b9f595e26e81
So I investigated these failures extensively today, and my conclusions boiled down to: - I was sending way more invalidations than the old code did, primarily because of the old code's system of clearing Decoder::mInvalidRect every frame, which had the effect of us not sending invalidations in many of the places a naive reading of the code would give the impression that we do. Even when we did send invalidations from those places, we would've also sent the same invalidations from FinishedSomeDecoding, so I went ahead and cut down drastically on the number of places we send invalidations from. - It's better to decide whether to send invalidations in RasterImage, not in imgStatusTracker, as we can be smarter about things there. I've removed all filtering of invalidations from imgStatusTracker and replaced it with a simple set of explicit filters in RasterImage::FinishedSomeDecoding. This should produce more or less the same results as the old code, with the exception that we explicitly prohibit some things that were sort-of-only-accidentally prohibited by the old code. For one thing, we now definitely only send *partial* invalidations during decoding, and let OnStopFrame/OnStopDecode trigger full invalidations - 'test_synchronized_animation.html' depended on this, and it seems to make sense to me. For another thing, we now explicitly refuse to send invalidations for animated frames after the first, leaving that work to RequestRefresh. Both of these things capture how the old code ended up working in practice, but now they are explicit rules that will always be consistently enforced. These changes simplified the code and made it more understandable (which is nice!) and they fixed the existing failures for me locally.
Attachment #8510769 - Flags: review?(tnikkel)
Attachment #8507298 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8507298 - Flags: review?(tnikkel)
Here's a new try job. Linux and OS X debug only for now; I'll submit an 'all' job if this looks good: https://tbpl.mozilla.org/?tree=Try&rev=d14cf4efff0f
Whoops! I forgot to qref. This is the final version of the patch (modulo your review comments, of course). On the off chance you've already started reviewing, the only difference is some cleanup in 'imgStatusTracker.cpp'.
Attachment #8510775 - Flags: review?(tnikkel)
Attachment #8510769 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8510769 - Flags: review?(tnikkel)
So I changed my mind about not sending full invalidation rects. I decided that it makes sense to do that, and I should correct 'test_synchronized_animation.html' instead; the fact that it failed if I did that seems to me to be a bug in the test. I've made those changes in this new version of the patch. https://tbpl.mozilla.org/?tree=Try&rev=a090b7e7f4c1
Attachment #8512352 - Flags: review?(tnikkel)
Attachment #8510775 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8510775 - Flags: review?(tnikkel)
When debugging the |list-simple-1.html| failures in bug 1091229, I realized that the first instance of that failure in my patch stack actually occurred in this bug, not later in my patch stack as I had previously believed. This led me to reexamine this patch, and I believe I may have discovered a possible explanation for the problem. I didn't go far enough with the change I mentioned in comment 8 to send full invalidation rects; it's necessary to ensure that they are sent even if the image has been decoded before, which my previous changes didn't ensure. This new version of the patch should ensure that. It should be possible to write this more cleanly after bug 1089046; right now it's a bit awkward, but since that's the very next bug in this series of patches, I think some temporary awkwardness is acceptable. Try job here: https://tbpl.mozilla.org/?tree=Try&rev=90e77882a3b2
Attachment #8515345 - Flags: review?(tnikkel)
Attachment #8512352 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8512352 - Flags: review?(tnikkel)
Hmm. So somehow this change is causing a new set of test failures. =\ Will debug this in more detail when I have the time. I am particularly amazed that this is causing crashes, which really shouldn't be possible...
Blocks: 969406
No longer blocks: 969406
So I pulled today and tried to reproduce the 'browser_bug666317.js' failure again, and I can't. I could before pulling. I don't know if these failures were actually from something unrelated that got fixed when I pulled, or if perhaps some timing just changed and now it'll be harder to reproduce locally. Here's another try job to try to answer that question: https://tbpl.mozilla.org/?tree=Try&rev=b111d5e935e8
That try run looks good to me. So it seems like this patch is good to go, modulo review of course.
Attachment #8515345 - Flags: review?(tnikkel) → review+
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 10 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla36
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: