Closed
Bug 1088910
Opened 10 years ago
Closed 10 years ago
Default http/2 off on gecko 34 after EARLY_BETA
Categories
(Core :: Networking: HTTP, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
mozilla34
Tracking | Status | |
---|---|---|
firefox34 | + | fixed |
firefox35 | --- | unaffected |
b2g-v2.1 | --- | fixed |
People
(Reporter: mcmanus, Assigned: mcmanus)
Details
(Whiteboard: [spdy])
Attachments
(1 file)
1.09 KB,
patch
|
u408661
:
review+
lmandel
:
approval-mozilla-beta+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
http/2 as draft-14 has been riding the trains quite successfully - we've had good testing with twitter, jetty, google, and others. That testing has largely validated the implementation, it has also fixed both client and server side bugs and even a couple of spec bugs.
unfortunately the IETF isn't ready to say http/2 is done yet. A clear ETA is fuzzy.
Sending draft-14 out into the wild on the release channel in that state might be ok, because its versioned explicitly as a draft so it wouldn't create a protocol we couldn't update, its not appropriate to think that servers are going to treat it with the appropriate level of production respect that it would need on the release channel...
the level of server side support appropriate for the pre-release channels is different than release.
So I'm going to hold it back another 6 weeks with the consent of the release managers.
The diff attached to this bug will leave draft -14 support in the 34 release, but it will disable it after EARLY_BETA (maximizing whatever testing we can get from our pre-release audience). It leaves support enabled on 35 and 36.
Assignee | ||
Updated•10 years ago
|
status-firefox34:
--- → affected
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•10 years ago
|
||
Attachment #8511341 -
Flags: review?(hurley)
Assignee | ||
Updated•10 years ago
|
status-firefox35:
--- → unaffected
Attachment #8511341 -
Flags: review?(hurley) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•10 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8511341 [details] [diff] [review]
0001-bug-1088910-default-http-2-off-on-gecko-34-after-EAR.patch
Approval Request Comment
see comment 0 and general bug description
[Feature/regressing bug #]:
[User impact if declined]:
[Describe test coverage new/current, TBPL]:
[Risks and why]:
[String/UUID change made/needed]:
Attachment #8511341 -
Flags: approval-mozilla-beta?
Comment 3•10 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8511341 [details] [diff] [review]
0001-bug-1088910-default-http-2-off-on-gecko-34-after-EAR.patch
Beta+
Do you want to land the same change on m-c and Aurora so that we will only ship this feature once we deliberately remove the flag?
Flags: needinfo?(mcmanus)
Attachment #8511341 -
Flags: approval-mozilla-beta? → approval-mozilla-beta+
Updated•10 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → mcmanus
tracking-firefox34:
--- → +
Comment 4•10 years ago
|
||
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 10 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla34
Comment 5•10 years ago
|
||
status-b2g-v2.1:
--- → fixed
Assignee | ||
Comment 6•10 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Lawrence Mandel [:lmandel] (use needinfo) from comment #3)
> Comment on attachment 8511341 [details] [diff] [review]
> 0001-bug-1088910-default-http-2-off-on-gecko-34-after-EAR.patch
>
> Beta+
>
> Do you want to land the same change on m-c and Aurora so that we will only
> ship this feature once we deliberately remove the flag?
I've been talking with some standards people and I expect this feature will be binary compatible with the end result of the standards process - so let's let it ride by default at this point. If events warrant we can make a change but I don't think that will be necessary.
Flags: needinfo?(mcmanus)
Comment 7•10 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Patrick McManus [:mcmanus] from comment #6)
> I've been talking with some standards people and I expect this feature will
> be binary compatible with the end result of the standards process
I can confirm that. (Editor hat on)
Comment 8•10 years ago
|
||
OK. The feature will ship in 35.
Comment 9•10 years ago
|
||
Nice! How do we relnote this the right way?
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•