Closed Bug 1090689 Opened 10 years ago Closed 10 years ago

Add MPL2.0 to treeherder-[repos] where applicable

Categories

(Tree Management :: Treeherder, enhancement, P2)

enhancement

Tracking

(Not tracked)

VERIFIED FIXED

People

(Reporter: jfrench, Assigned: jfrench, Mentored)

References

()

Details

(Whiteboard: [good first bug][lang=python][lang=js])

Attachments

(6 files)

Just crossed my mind, we might want to inject the MPL2.0 header into relevant file types into applicable treeherder repos. js: /* This Source Code Form is subject to the terms of the Mozilla Public * License, v. 2.0. If a copy of the MPL was not distributed with this * file, you can obtain one at http://mozilla.org/MPL/2.0/. */ py: # This Source Code Form is subject to the terms of the Mozilla Public # License, v. 2.0. If a copy of the MPL was not distributed with this # file, you can obtain one at http://mozilla.org/MPL/2.0/. And any other file types we might like.
Bah good spot, we really should have been doing this from the start. Gerv, I'm presuming I need an ack from contributors before adding the header - do I need it from contributors who are employees, or is that a given with their contracts? The repos are: https://github.com/mozilla/treeherder-service https://github.com/mozilla/treeherder-ui https://github.com/mozilla/treeherder-client (though this one seems to have mostly correct headers already)
Blocks: 1072681
Flags: needinfo?(gerv)
Priority: P5 → P2
Contributor lists: curl https://api.github.com/repos/mozilla/treeherder-service/contributors | grep 'html_url' "html_url": "https://github.com/camd", "html_url": "https://github.com/maurodoglio", "html_url": "https://github.com/jeads", "html_url": "https://github.com/edmorley", "html_url": "https://github.com/pnispel", "html_url": "https://github.com/uberj", "html_url": "https://github.com/KWierso", "html_url": "https://github.com/lightsofapollo", "html_url": "https://github.com/tojonmz", "html_url": "https://github.com/jonasfj", "html_url": "https://github.com/Ako0", "html_url": "https://github.com/AutomatedTester", "html_url": "https://github.com/sylvestre", curl https://api.github.com/repos/mozilla/treeherder-ui/contributors | grep 'html_url' "html_url": "https://github.com/camd", "html_url": "https://github.com/jeads", "html_url": "https://github.com/maurodoglio", "html_url": "https://github.com/tojonmz", "html_url": "https://github.com/edmorley", "html_url": "https://github.com/wlach", "html_url": "https://github.com/pnispel", "html_url": "https://github.com/Ako0", "html_url": "https://github.com/KWierso", "html_url": "https://github.com/AutomatedTester", "html_url": "https://github.com/lightsofapollo", "html_url": "https://github.com/sylvestre", "html_url": "https://github.com/markrcote", "html_url": "https://github.com/koddsson", "html_url": "https://github.com/mbrubeck", "html_url": "https://github.com/laggyluke", "html_url": "https://github.com/jeffgodwyll", curl https://api.github.com/repos/mozilla/treeherder-client/contributors | grep 'html_url' "html_url": "https://github.com/jeads", "html_url": "https://github.com/maurodoglio", "html_url": "https://github.com/camd", Consolidated: https://github.com/Ako0 https://github.com/AutomatedTester https://github.com/KWierso https://github.com/camd https://github.com/edmorley https://github.com/jeads https://github.com/jeffgodwyll https://github.com/jonasfj https://github.com/koddsson https://github.com/laggyluke https://github.com/lightsofapollo https://github.com/markrcote https://github.com/maurodoglio https://github.com/mbrubeck https://github.com/pnispel https://github.com/sylvestre https://github.com/tojonmz https://github.com/uberj https://github.com/wlach
If there's been no license thusfar, or if the license has been stated as MPL 2 elsewhere but was not in the headers (as seems to be the case for treeherder-service, at least - it has a top-level LICENSE.txt file), you don't need anyone's permission. If you told everyone the license was going to be something else, then you need the permission of non-employee contributors. The LICENSE.txt file in treeherder-service should be called LICENSE, and should contain a copy of: https://www.mozilla.org/MPL/2.0/index.txt . Gerv
Flags: needinfo?(gerv)
That's really helpful - thank you :-) We've either not stated what licence, or have just listed it in the LICENSE.txt file (and not in the headers), so sounds like we're fine and can just make this change.
Mentor: emorley
Whiteboard: [good first bug] → [good first bug][lang=python][lang=js]
Attached file ui-jsListAll
I had a quick look at the -ui repo recurisvely from /webapp. Since there's very few py, sh, or other file types, I built a js list for Ed to evaluate. I've split the list into three parts - proposed for headers, proposed excluded, and unknown. Let me know what alterations are required and I'll inject the desired headers.
Attachment #8514447 - Flags: feedback?(emorley)
Comment on attachment 8514447 [details] ui-jsListAll Looks good with the following changes: Unknown: ./test/vendor/ --> exclude ./scripts/web-server.js --> exclude <everything else in unknown> --> include Thanks! :-)
Attachment #8514447 - Flags: feedback?(emorley) → feedback+
Attached file treeherder-ui-PR#256
Please see the above PR for treeherder-ui. Setting Ed and/or William for review at their leisure, whoever gets to it first.
Attachment #8515180 - Flags: review?(wlachance)
Attachment #8515180 - Flags: review?(emorley)
Assignee: nobody → tojonmz
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Comment on attachment 8515180 [details] [review] treeherder-ui-PR#256 Thanks!
Attachment #8515180 - Flags: review?(wlachance)
Attachment #8515180 - Flags: review?(emorley)
Attachment #8515180 - Flags: review+
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 10 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Thanks wlach! Actually we need this bug still open for part2, which is treeherder-service, and then treeherder-client. I figured on using one bug for all. I'll have a look at service next.
Status: RESOLVED → REOPENED
Resolution: FIXED → ---
Attached file service-listProposed
Here's the proposed treeherder-service header candidates, updating .conf .sh .pp and .py files. I've removed the vendor files already. Adding Ed for feedback. Let me know if anything needs to be pruned.
Attachment #8515343 - Flags: feedback?(emorley)
Comment on attachment 8515343 [details] service-listProposed Looks good (excluding ./addPyHeader.sh), thank you :-)
Attachment #8515343 - Flags: feedback?(emorley) → feedback+
Thanks Ed, will do.
Please see the above PR for treeherder-service.
Attachment #8516169 - Flags: review?(mdoglio)
Attachment #8516169 - Flags: review?(mdoglio) → review+
Confirmed landed fine on treeherder-service. On to treeherder-client next.
Attached file treeherder-client-PR#6
Please see the above PR for treeherder-client.
Attachment #8524295 - Flags: review?(mdoglio)
Attachment #8524295 - Flags: review?(mdoglio) → review+
Comment on attachment 8524295 [details] [review] treeherder-client-PR#6 https://github.com/mozilla/treeherder-client/commit/a8186c70aed55677136174fd5cda9ffcdd05514f (The bugzilla & IRC bots were not set up for treeherder-client, have done the latter now, and emailed Wes for the former, since I don't know the bot gmail account password)
We think we'd like to also add MPL headers to treeherder-node also. Either lightsofapollo or Ed will move the repo to be under /mozilla first, then after that I'll update the files.
I don't have permission to move James' own repo :-)
Sorry, ya. James has moved his repo now, he indicated in channel it's under automation. I am not sure if that refers to repo ownership, but anyway it is now here https://github.com/mozilla/treeherder-node
(In reply to Jonathan French (:jfrench) from comment #21) > Sorry, ya. James has moved his repo now, he indicated in channel it's under > automation. I am not sure if that refers to repo ownership, but anyway it is > now here https://github.com/mozilla/treeherder-node Yeah the repo is under the "automation" team on Github. I've also added the "treeherder" team, set up IRC/Bugzilla hooks, adjusted the README/package.json & also places elsewhere that link to the repo (wiki, READMEs in UI/service). Should be good to go now :-)
Thanks Ed! Headers update coming up shortly.
Attached file treeherder-node-PR#3
Please see above PR for review and status.
Attachment #8524742 - Flags: review?(mdoglio)
Attachment #8524742 - Flags: review?(mdoglio) → review+
I think we are done here, so unless anyone has anything else I'm marking this fixed, and also marking verified based on the current states of the repo.
Status: REOPENED → RESOLVED
Closed: 10 years ago10 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: