Closed
Bug 1093355
Opened 10 years ago
Closed 10 years ago
Flaky hazard analysis runs
Categories
(Core :: JavaScript: GC, defect)
Core
JavaScript: GC
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: sfink, Assigned: sfink)
Details
Attachments
(2 files)
747 bytes,
patch
|
terrence
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
441 bytes,
patch
|
nthomas
:
review+
pmoore
:
checkin+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
Bug 1062888 - https://treeherder.mozilla.org/ui/#/jobs?repo=try&revision=307c6fa1d3c6 shows persistent hazard analysis failures. But they are different, and that push makes a good representative for the haz flakiness we've been seeing recently. The problems in the first two haz builds in that push are: 08:49:46 INFO - uncaught exception: assertion failed: GC function not found: void js::gc::GCRuntime::collect(uint8, int64, uint32, uint32) 11:03:37 INFO - /builds/slave/sixgill/util/hashtable_impl.h: 111: LookupSingle: Assertion 'list != NULL' failed. So the first managed to finish successfully but the resulting DB mysteriously did not contain an expected function. The second seems like it had a corrupted internal sixgill hashtable. Wtf? I note that both of these took well over an hour. Successful builds generally take 23 minutes. I smell memory problems again.
Comment 1•10 years ago
|
||
Same issues with Bug 1050160 - https://treeherder.mozilla.org/ui/#/jobs?repo=try&revision=276053e8f9d4 Is there a way I can help fixing these issues?
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•10 years ago
|
||
This is basically bug 1045165 for the browser build.
Attachment #8518292 -
Flags: review?(terrence)
Assignee | ||
Updated•10 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → sphink
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Updated•10 years ago
|
Attachment #8518292 -
Flags: review?(terrence) → review+
Updated•10 years ago
|
Attachment #8518860 -
Flags: review?(nthomas) → review+
Updated•10 years ago
|
Attachment #8518860 -
Flags: checkin+
Comment 4•10 years ago
|
||
Checked in code deployed to production
Comment 5•10 years ago
|
||
Hi Steve, Are we good to close this bug now? Thanks, Pete
Flags: needinfo?(sphink)
Assignee | ||
Comment 6•10 years ago
|
||
I think so. I'll open a new bug if needed, anyway. Thanks!
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 10 years ago
Flags: needinfo?(sphink)
Resolution: --- → FIXED
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•