1095533 - Add a boolean 'owner' field to the participant object when it's the owner of that room

Status: RESOLVED FIXED

(Hello (Loop) :: Server, defect, P1)

Description

[Mike de Boer [:mikedeboer]]

Snippet of my IRC conversation with Rémy:

[15:22:00] <natim> mreavy: mikedeboer actually you can use the participant account property for that
[15:22:39] <mikedeboer> natim: so the participant that has an account property is the current owner?
[15:23:06] <natim> You mean for other people or for yourself?
[15:23:17] <natim> Who needs to know it is the owner?
[15:24:18] <natim> If you are not the owner you don't know who is the owner except if you get the room and see who is the roomOwner
[15:24:59] <mikedeboer> natim: wait, you only get the rooms you own in GET rooms/, right?
[15:25:19] <natim> On GET /rooms yet but not on GET /rooms/:token
[15:25:27] <natim> https://wiki.mozilla.org/index.php?title=Loop/Architecture/Rooms#GET_.2Frooms.2F.7Btoken.7D
[15:25:41] <mikedeboer> natim: right! that anwers my question :)
[15:25:44] <mikedeboer> thanks!
[15:25:50] <natim> Also the doc is wrong
[15:25:52] <natim> fixing
[15:26:53] <natim> mikedeboer: let me double check that actually
[15:28:15] <natim> mikedeboer: you are right there is something here
[15:28:41] <natim> Actually the room owner gives the roomOwner content during the roomCreation
[15:28:56] <natim> https://wiki.mozilla.org/Loop/Architecture/Rooms#POST_.2Frooms
[15:29:55] <mikedeboer> ok
[15:29:56] <natim> We should probably add a owner property on the participant if he is the owner
[15:30:11] <natim> Could you please add a bug about that so we can discuss it with Adam?
[15:30:12] <mikedeboer> natim: that actually makes a lot of sense to me
[15:30:22] <mikedeboer> natim: sure
[15:30:30] <natim> Thank you

I reckon we'd like to have this for Fx 35.

Comment 1

[Rémy Hubscher (:natim)]

Attachment: Link to GitHub PR.

Comment 2

[Alexis Metaireau (:alexis)]

https://github.com/mozilla-services/loop-server/commit/fc6eceda9c1cb967bc2524aff76fd73115ffeb0d