Closed
Bug 1099448
Opened 10 years ago
Closed 9 years ago
properties parsed with CSSParserImpl::ParseBoxProperties incorrectly accept values with errors inside functions
Categories
(Core :: CSS Parsing and Computation, defect)
Core
CSS Parsing and Computation
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
mozilla42
Tracking | Status | |
---|---|---|
firefox42 | --- | fixed |
People
(Reporter: bgrins, Assigned: heycam)
References
()
Details
Attachments
(3 files, 3 obsolete files)
I was trying to set a shorthand margin property using a css variable and bumped into something that looks like a bug with variables used inside of calc(). Test case here: http://jsbin.com/livafoxama/2/edit?html,css,output
<div class="foo"> foo </div>
<div class="bar"> bar </div>
<style>
:root {
--pad: 40px;
}
.foo {
padding: 0 calc(0px + var(--pad));
}
.bar {
padding-left: calc(0px + var(--pad));
padding-right: calc(0px + var(--pad));
}
</style>
Notice that the bar element is padded on the sides, but the foo element isn't
Reporter | ||
Updated•10 years ago
|
Summary: CSS variable used with calc() used in shorthand css property doesn't work → CSS variable used with calc() in shorthand css property doesn't work
Reporter | ||
Comment 1•10 years ago
|
||
Cam, am I missing something or is this an issue with calc and/or css variables?
Flags: needinfo?(cam)
(without all the jsbin gunk)
Interestingly, it works without the "0 " at the beginning of the padding value.
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•10 years ago
|
||
An issue with CSS variables. Given it works without the "0 ", I wonder if we're accidentally parsing the stored token stream as one of the component longhand properties, rather than parsing it as the shorthand and then getting the corresponding longhand property that was set.
Flags: needinfo?(cam)
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•10 years ago
|
||
Actually, turns out there is an underlying problem with parsing shorthand properties like 'padding' that use ParseBoxProperties. Here's a test that doesn't use variables. Notice that padding is applied even though the property should have failed to parse.
ParseBoxProperties calls ParseSingleValueProperty which will end up calling ParseVariant for each of the four non-negative values it expects. ParseVariant, when encountering a "calc(" with a syntax error inside it, will SkipUtil(')') and return false. But ParseBoxProperties just uses the false return value of ParseSingleValueProperty to break the NS_FOR_CSS_SIDES loop, and seeing that we have one valid value, will return true. Then, back up in ParseProperty (which called ParsePropertyByFunction for 'padding') it calls ExpectEndProperty, which returns true because we're now at the ';'.
I guess ParseBoxProperties needs to distinguish between ParseSingleValueProperty consuming something and failing versus consuming nothing and failing.
(I guess prior to calc() there wasn't a way for it to consume something and fail for the properties that ParseBoxProperties uses, so this is a regression from implementing calc().)
Blocks: 585715
Assignee | ||
Comment 6•10 years ago
|
||
Looks like there was:
<div style="border: 8px solid green; border-color: red rgb(nonsense)">hello</div>
shows a red border.
Assignee | ||
Updated•10 years ago
|
Summary: CSS variable used with calc() in shorthand css property doesn't work → properties parsed with CSSParserImpl::ParseBoxProperties incorrectly accept values with errors inside functions
Assignee | ||
Comment 7•10 years ago
|
||
This also applies to ParseGroupedBoxProperty but none of the properties parsed with that accept calc() values at the moment.
Assignee | ||
Comment 8•10 years ago
|
||
I fixed ParseGroupedBoxProperty too and tested locally by allowing calc() values in border-image-width and border-image-outset. I put invalid values using calc() in property_database.js for when we end up supporting calc() in these properties.
Assignee | ||
Comment 9•10 years ago
|
||
Assignee | ||
Comment 10•10 years ago
|
||
Update test expectations.
Attachment #8523629 -
Flags: review?(dbaron)
Assignee | ||
Updated•10 years ago
|
Attachment #8523596 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8523596 -
Flags: review?(dbaron)
Comment on attachment 8523629 [details] [diff] [review]
patch v2
Instead of writing all this new code to see if we consumed tokens, why
not just use GetNextTokenLocation both before and after the call to
ParseSingleValueProperty or ParseNonNegativeVariant and see if they're
different?
Also, maybe add some rgb(nonsense) to the tests for properties that take
colors, including both box properties and others?
Sorry again for the delay getting to this.
Attachment #8523629 -
Flags: review?(dbaron) → review-
Assignee | ||
Comment 12•9 years ago
|
||
(In reply to David Baron [:dbaron] ⏰UTC-7 (mostly busy, back June 29) from comment #11)
> Comment on attachment 8523629 [details] [diff] [review]
> patch v2
>
> Instead of writing all this new code to see if we consumed tokens, why
> not just use GetNextTokenLocation both before and after the call to
> ParseSingleValueProperty or ParseNonNegativeVariant and see if they're
> different?
Yeah, that works.
Attachment #8523629 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8625597 -
Flags: review?(dbaron)
Assignee | ||
Comment 13•9 years ago
|
||
Reporter | ||
Comment 14•9 years ago
|
||
Just bumped into a similar problem in Bug 1049012, and I'm curious if this fix will cover it or if I should file a new bug? See the attached testcase, bug basically vars don't seem to work in border-image properties.
Flags: needinfo?(cam)
Comment 15•9 years ago
|
||
Seems more like a problem in linear-gradients rather than border-image.
Assignee | ||
Comment 16•9 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Brian Grinstead [:bgrins] from comment #14)
> Just bumped into a similar problem in Bug 1049012, and I'm curious if this
> fix will cover it or if I should file a new bug? See the attached testcase,
> bug basically vars don't seem to work in border-image properties.
No it doesn't seem to help with this. Please do file a new bug.
Flags: needinfo?(cam)
Reporter | ||
Comment 17•9 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8627962 [details]
border-image-variable.html
(In reply to Cameron McCormack (:heycam) from comment #16)
> (In reply to Brian Grinstead [:bgrins] from comment #14)
> > Just bumped into a similar problem in Bug 1049012, and I'm curious if this
> > fix will cover it or if I should file a new bug? See the attached testcase,
> > bug basically vars don't seem to work in border-image properties.
>
> No it doesn't seem to help with this. Please do file a new bug.
Alright, filed Bug 1179078
Attachment #8627962 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Comment on attachment 8625597 [details] [diff] [review]
patch v3
I'd prefer if CSSParserImpl::ParseBoxPropertyVariant set aConsumedTokens
to true when returning true, rather than setting aConsumedTokens to false
in that case. (It shouldn't need to check the token location.)
CSSParserImpl::ParseBoxProperty should also assert that
!nsCSSProps::PropHasFlags(aPropID, CSS_PROPERTY_VALUE_PARSER_FUNCTION)
r=dbaron with that
Attachment #8625597 -
Flags: review?(dbaron) → review+
Comment 19•9 years ago
|
||
Comment 20•9 years ago
|
||
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 9 years ago
status-firefox42:
--- → fixed
Flags: in-testsuite+
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla42
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•