Closed Bug 1100294 Opened 10 years ago Closed 10 years ago

Deprecate PlacesUtils.getURLAndPostDataForKeyword

Categories

(Toolkit :: Places, defect)

defect
Not set
normal
Points:
1

Tracking

()

RESOLVED FIXED
mozilla39
Iteration:
39.3 - 30 Mar
Tracking Status
firefox39 --- fixed

People

(Reporter: mak, Assigned: ttaubert)

References

Details

Attachments

(3 files, 2 obsolete files)

getURIAndPostDataForKeyword should be deprecated in favor of promiseUrlAndPostDataForKeyword, but first we must fix the consumers.
Points: --- → 1
Flags: qe-verify-
Flags: firefox-backlog+
I bet this would make a fine mentored bug, if it had a mentor to hand.
this is not actionable and the dependency is hairy.
Blocks: 1140395
No longer blocks: placesAsyncBookmarks
Blocks: 1141547
it's not promiseUrlAndPostDataForKeyword anymore, it's instead PlacesUtils.keywords.fetch
Assignee: nobody → ttaubert
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Iteration: --- → 39.3 - 30 Mar
Accepting a callback again as well as returning a Promise. Passing a callback will yield a deprecation warning.
Attachment #8583180 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8583180 - Flags: review?(mak77)
Attachment #8583186 - Flags: review?(mak77)
Same patch without white space changes.
Attachment #8583187 - Flags: review?(mak77)
Looking at the remaining usages of getURLAndPostDataForKeyword() I have a question: Can toolkit/components/places/tests/unit/test_398914.js be removed? It looks like it's testing a situation that can't occur with the new DB scheme anymore.
Flags: needinfo?(mak77)
(In reply to Tim Taubert [:ttaubert] from comment #7) > Can toolkit/components/places/tests/unit/test_398914.js be removed? It looks > like it's testing a situation that can't occur with the new DB scheme > anymore. Meant to say that I'm sure the new keywords API tests cover multiple keywords for a single URI.
(In reply to Tim Taubert [:ttaubert] from comment #7) > Looking at the remaining usages of getURLAndPostDataForKeyword() I have a > question: > > Can toolkit/components/places/tests/unit/test_398914.js be removed? It looks > like it's testing a situation that can't occur with the new DB scheme > anymore. yes, we can remove it.
Flags: needinfo?(mak77)
Comment on attachment 8583186 [details] [diff] [review] 0001-Bug-1100294-Deprecate-PlacesUtils.getURLAndPostDataF.patch, v2 Review of attachment 8583186 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- ::: browser/base/content/browser.js @@ +2097,5 @@ > allowThirdPartyFixup: allowThirdPartyFixup }); > } catch (e) {} > } > > +function getShortcutOrURIAndPostData(aURL, aCallback = null) { while here, would you mind adding a minimal javadoc to this? @@ +2122,5 @@ > + if (engine) { > + let submission = engine.getSubmission(param, null, "keyword"); > + postData = submission.postData; > + return { postData: submission.postData, url: submission.uri.spec, > + mayInheritPrincipal: mayInheritPrincipal }; nit: just mayInheritPrincipal @@ +2133,5 @@ > + } > + > + if (!shortcutURL) { > + return { postData: postData, url: aURL, > + mayInheritPrincipal: mayInheritPrincipal }; ditto, also for postData additionally if you change argument names to be url and callback, you can also do the same for url, so here we get return { postdata, url, mayInheritPrincipal }; @@ +2184,5 @@ > // document's principal. > mayInheritPrincipal = true; > > + return { postData: postData, url: shortcutURL, > + mayInheritPrincipal: mayInheritPrincipal }; ditto @@ +2193,5 @@ > + // the original URL. > + postData = null; > + > + return { postData: postData, url: aURL, > + mayInheritPrincipal: mayInheritPrincipal }; ditto @@ +2201,5 @@ > // document's principal. > mayInheritPrincipal = true; > > + return { postData: postData, url: shortcutURL, > + mayInheritPrincipal: mayInheritPrincipal }; ditto
Attachment #8583186 - Flags: review?(mak77) → review+
Clearly before landing this, we need to fix all internal usage, included tests. once test_398914.js is removed, there isn't much, a couple migration tests, test_placesTxn and metro (that I'm not why it's still in-tree and thus I have no idea what we are supposed to do)
Attachment #8583187 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8583187 - Flags: review?(mak77)
Attachment #8583841 - Flags: review?(mak77) → review+
The problem is here var newTabButtonObserver = { ... onDrop: function (aEvent) { let url = browserDragAndDrop.drop(aEvent, { }); getShortcutOrURIAndPostData(url, data => { if (data.url) { // allow third-party services to fixup this URL openNewTabWith(data.url, null, data.postData, aEvent, true); } }); } sounds like we are passing an empty string to getShortcutOrURIAndPostData?
ehr, and it's not the only place (for example newWindowButtonObserver), middleMousePaste.... We could make getSOUAP return immediately for an empty string, or make fetch do the same. At this point I don't think it's worth fixing the consumers.
Flags: needinfo?(ttaubert)
Attachment #8584438 - Flags: review?(mak77)
Attachment #8584438 - Flags: review?(mak77) → review+
Blocks: 1148415
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 10 years ago
Flags: in-testsuite+
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla39
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: