Closed
Bug 1113565
Opened 10 years ago
Closed 10 years ago
[Loop] Wrong or confusing message trying to authenticate (MobileID WITHOUT physical SIM card), with wrong mobile date (e.g. one year before)
Categories
(Firefox OS Graveyard :: Gaia::Loop, defect)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: javier.deprado, Assigned: jaoo)
References
Details
(Whiteboard: [mobile app])
Attachments
(6 files, 4 obsolete files)
STR: 1.- Set mobile Date & Time to current date right. 2.- Open Loop app and make login with valid MobileID 3.- Logout from Loop. 3.- Change mobile date to one year before. (2013) 4.- Open loop again and try to login with MobileID again. ACTUAL RESULT: After entering right credentials, this message is shown (see attachment): "Sorry, due to problems on our side your account session has expired. Please try loggin in again. If the problem persists, you might need to log out from Firefox Accounts o the Setttings App." EXPECTED RESULT: IMHO, I think that messages relating to Firefox Accounts should not be displayed trying to login with mobileID. They could confuse to the user.
Reporter | ||
Comment 1•10 years ago
|
||
WebID screenshot
Reporter | ||
Comment 2•10 years ago
|
||
WetID screenshot
Assignee | ||
Updated•10 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → josea.olivera
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•10 years ago
|
||
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•10 years ago
|
||
Not able to reproduce the issue as it is described at comment 0. Javier, could you give a try and collect some logs please? I would be super helpful to enable MobileId debugging. user_pref("services.mobileid.loglevel", "Debug"); user_pref("services.hawk.loglevel", "Debug"); user_pref("services.hawk.log.sensitive", true);
Flags: needinfo?(javier.deprado)
Reporter | ||
Comment 5•10 years ago
|
||
I can't reproduce it anymore on FireE. But following the same STR described above, It is still reproducing on Flame: Flame build: flame-KK.user.v2.1.188based.B-73.Gecko-8454ca1.Gaia-5c93577 Loop versions: master/51a04dd and 1.1/d1417d1
Flags: needinfo?(javier.deprado)
Reporter | ||
Comment 6•10 years ago
|
||
Sorry, the correct Flame build version is (not 2.1): flame-KK.user.v2.0.188based.B-143.Gecko-4d85914.Gaia-31d6c94
Assignee | ||
Comment 7•10 years ago
|
||
I did my test on Flame running flame-KK.eng.v2.0.AutomationVersion.188based.B-81.Gecko-4d85914.Gaia-31d6c94 and it was working fine. :(
Reporter | ||
Comment 8•10 years ago
|
||
Reporter | ||
Comment 9•10 years ago
|
||
Reporter | ||
Updated•10 years ago
|
Summary: [Loop] Wrong or confusing message trying to authenticate with wrong mobile date (e.g. one year before) → [Loop] Wrong or confusing message trying to authenticate (MobileID WITHOUT physical SIM card), with wrong mobile date (e.g. one year before)
Reporter | ||
Comment 10•10 years ago
|
||
It is always happening without physical SIM card in Flame or FireE devices.
Assignee | ||
Comment 11•10 years ago
|
||
Attachment #8547665 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8547668 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Assignee | ||
Comment 12•10 years ago
|
||
Attachment #8548222 -
Flags: ui-review?(monica.meika)
Assignee | ||
Comment 13•10 years ago
|
||
Attachment #8548222 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8548222 -
Flags: ui-review?(monica.meika)
Attachment #8548236 -
Flags: ui-review?(monica.meika)
Assignee | ||
Comment 14•10 years ago
|
||
Attachment #8548236 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8548236 -
Flags: ui-review?(monica.meika)
Attachment #8548240 -
Flags: ui-review?(monica.meika)
Updated•10 years ago
|
Attachment #8548240 -
Flags: ui-review?(monica.meika) → ui-review+
Assignee | ||
Updated•10 years ago
|
Attachment #8547506 -
Flags: review?(crdlc)
Comment 15•10 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8547506 [details] [review] Pointer to Github PR https://github.com/mozilla-b2g/firefoxos-loop-client/pull/437 LGTM, thanks a lot José.
Attachment #8547506 -
Flags: review?(crdlc) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 16•10 years ago
|
||
Landed on master branch at: https://github.com/mozilla-b2g/firefoxos-loop-client/commit/41e034c29e13e864c0ef6f454693caef00e6ceaf Javier, should we uplift this to 1.1 branch as well? Please, let me know.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 10 years ago
Flags: needinfo?(javier.deprado)
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Reporter | ||
Comment 17•9 years ago
|
||
Yep. This bug should also be solved in version 1.1, and we will take it into account to do regression testing on v1.1 María Angeles, Do you think so?
Flags: needinfo?(javier.deprado) → needinfo?(oteo)
Comment 18•9 years ago
|
||
I think it's not worth it as the next planned version 1.1.1 will include this fix. It's enough verifying that the patch works fine in master branch (next 1.1.1 version)
Flags: needinfo?(oteo)
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•